D
DL82
Guest
I mentioned this in another thread, but think it probably needs a discussion of its’ own.
Probably the main force exerting a ‘call’ to religious life in my life is the sense that it’s what you do when you want to completely serve the Lord. Or, put differently, it’s what’s expected when you’re a single guy in your late 20’s who goes to daily Mass and rosary and is actively involved in parish life.
I know the Church has been trying to stress the equality of the role of the laity in recent years, but the dominant image in Christifideles Laici, of the workers at the 11th hour - “you also go into my vineyard” - suggests that they are a bit of an after-thought. I still get the feeling as a lay person I’d still be second best.
This is compounded by my highly traditional view of my professional field (academic study in religious education), which seems like a field that would traditionally have been a clerical one, even if I can hardly think of a single priest who has been influential in my academic field since World War II. As an academic in the UK, I probably wouldn’t earn enough to support a large family on a single income, and I am quite a traditionalist about marriage too. I know many academics who are married to others in academia, but I can’t imagine that being me.
At the same time, if I follow this argument to its logical conclusion, it suggests that there is no need for young lay people to be devout, or no role for devout people to be married lay folks working in the world. Clearly that’s not what I think.
A related issue is the call of desperation - the idea that there is a ‘vocations crisis’ in the Church, i.e. that there are few people listening to the call. Since I’m someone who takes the Church seriously, maybe I should just forget self and go fill this gap. After all, if you undertake the Sacrament of Holy Orders, you do, from that point on, have a vocation to the priesthood, regardless of whether you did before, because the sacrament accomplishes what it signifies.
So, I’m asking, has anyone else had cause to wonder whether they have a vocation solely on the basis that they’re one of the few young, single people who take their faith seriously?
Probably the main force exerting a ‘call’ to religious life in my life is the sense that it’s what you do when you want to completely serve the Lord. Or, put differently, it’s what’s expected when you’re a single guy in your late 20’s who goes to daily Mass and rosary and is actively involved in parish life.
I know the Church has been trying to stress the equality of the role of the laity in recent years, but the dominant image in Christifideles Laici, of the workers at the 11th hour - “you also go into my vineyard” - suggests that they are a bit of an after-thought. I still get the feeling as a lay person I’d still be second best.
This is compounded by my highly traditional view of my professional field (academic study in religious education), which seems like a field that would traditionally have been a clerical one, even if I can hardly think of a single priest who has been influential in my academic field since World War II. As an academic in the UK, I probably wouldn’t earn enough to support a large family on a single income, and I am quite a traditionalist about marriage too. I know many academics who are married to others in academia, but I can’t imagine that being me.
At the same time, if I follow this argument to its logical conclusion, it suggests that there is no need for young lay people to be devout, or no role for devout people to be married lay folks working in the world. Clearly that’s not what I think.
A related issue is the call of desperation - the idea that there is a ‘vocations crisis’ in the Church, i.e. that there are few people listening to the call. Since I’m someone who takes the Church seriously, maybe I should just forget self and go fill this gap. After all, if you undertake the Sacrament of Holy Orders, you do, from that point on, have a vocation to the priesthood, regardless of whether you did before, because the sacrament accomplishes what it signifies.
So, I’m asking, has anyone else had cause to wonder whether they have a vocation solely on the basis that they’re one of the few young, single people who take their faith seriously?