The Catholic Church is just another denomination

  • Thread starter Thread starter guanophore
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Because when the Protestants split away from the Catholic Church, they renounced all and everything of the Catholic Church, in order to start over from scratch.

“All and everything” includes Jesus Christ.
No, I don’t agree with that. They broke away from the Catholic Church because among other things they thought it had become corrupt. They may have broke away from many of the Church’s teachings, but not Jesus Christ himself.

The majority of Protestant denominations are very devout followers of Christ.
 
Because when the Protestants split away from the Catholic Church, they renounced all and everything of the Catholic Church, in order to start over from scratch.

“All and everything” includes Jesus Christ.
Not even remotely close to the truth. Read the confessions of the reformers yourself and see otherwise.

Augsburg Confession (Lutheran)
ctsfw.edu/etext/boc/ac/

Westminster Confession (Reformed/Calvinist/Presbyterian, etc.)
reformed.org/documents/wcf_with_proofs/

Thirty-Nine Articles (Anglican)
anglicansonline.org/basics/thirty-nine_articles.html
 
Non-Catholic Christians who want to be part of Christ’s body, who are not aware at all of the sins of their ancestors, and who thought they were joining Christ’s Church when they became part of their Protestant church, are not guilty of the sin of separation, and are joined in an imperfect manner to the Church (although they cannot participate in the Sacraments of the Church) - but God’s will is that we should all become actual members of Christ’s Church, and participate fully in His Sacraments.
By your own post: “non-Catholic Christans…are joined in an imperfect manner to the Church.”

You’ve said two things I agree with:
  1. We are Christians.
  2. We are joined to the Church. (you did not say the Roman Catholic Church).
If we are Christians and joined to the Church, how can you say that we are not a part of the body? In so doing, it is Roman Catholics who break the spirit of the scripture Paul articulates in 1 Corinthians 12. Even the teachings of the Roman Catholic Church itself are against you on this matter. Either we are brothers and sisters together in Christ or we are not. If we are not, it is not because we protested the authority of the Church, it is because you have dismissed us. For as much as we may disagree over authority and a few other points of doctrine, we do not deny that we are still brothers and sisters in Christ. But the authority to make the declaration does not belong to the Roman Catholic Church, it belongs to God and God alone – not to Christ’s vicar on earth. The keys of hell may have been turned over to Peter, but not the keys to heaven. If Christ accepts us, and he does, then who are you or anyone else to turn aside that which Christ has accepted.

At minimum, it is arrogance. Beyond that, such a view itself borders on heresy.
 
The catholic church doesn’t equal the Roman Catholic church
I feel there is a certain amount of sinful pride among Roman Catholics. Not belonging to the RCC doesn’t mean one is in a theological vacuum. Does Alex Jones say that (former Pentecostal pastor and Catholic convert)? No he doesn’t.
So true. The Roman Catholic Church as you call it (which is called the Catholic Church by its members), which we’ll assume is the Church headed by the Bishop of Rome, one of the Apostolic churches founded by Christ’s most glorious apostles Peter & Paul, is the epitome of the Christian Church. It is the president of the Church. Other churches, such as the Eastern-Rite Catholic Churches are also part of that same Universal Church whose founders were other apostles besides Peter & Paul, but choose to remain in Unity with the Apostolic See because Christ gave Peter the Keys to the Kingdom and the authority to bind and loose. There is one magisterium for east & west, the bishops of each being equal to the other. Peter was the first, and the rock of the Church which guaranteed the Roman Pontiff the charism of infallibility to protect his flock as Christ told Peter to “Feed His Sheep”. Thus, the Pope is the visible sign of unity of the Universal Church to which every Christian must assent the due respect and render proper authority. Denying this rightful authority makes one a schismatic; denying doctrines central to the Christian Faith makes one a heretic.
 
The “Catholic Church” is the Church that succeeds in unbroken order from Peter (the chief Apostle of Jesus Christ) to the Pope in Rome.
No! That just is not true. The catholic church is the body of Christ. It includes all Christians. It is not the exclusive pervue of a few (or the many millions) that take their marching orders from Rome. All who claim Jesus as both Lord and Savior are catholic.

I will repeat what I’ve already said. When it became Roman Catholic it quit being truly catholic.
 
No! That just is not true. The catholic church is the body of Christ. It includes all Christians. It is not the exclusive pervue of a few (or the many millions) that take their marching orders from Rome. All who claim Jesus as both Lord and Savior are catholic.
Grace Seeker, there is no “invisible Church” on Earth there is one visible church headed by the Pope in Rome with Christ as its Eternal Head.
 
When it became Roman Catholic it quit being truly catholic.
It became “Roman Catholic” when Peter arrived in Rome.

Peter was ordained by Christ to be chief shepherd of the Church. (John 21:15-19)

His successors are the Popes of that specific Catholic Church whose headquarters are still in Rome today.
 
Not even remotely close to the truth. Read the confessions of the reformers yourself and see otherwise.

Augsburg Confession (Lutheran)
ctsfw.edu/etext/boc/ac/

Westminster Confession (Reformed/Calvinist/Presbyterian, etc.)
reformed.org/documents/wcf_with_proofs/

Thirty-Nine Articles (Anglican)
anglicansonline.org/basics/thirty-nine_articles.html
If they throw out Christ’s Sacraments, Christ’s commandments, Christ’s Body, and Christ’s Bishops, then what remains of Christ have they kept?

They may not have intended to throw out Christ, but when they threw out His Church (which is His Body) they did.
 
If they throw out Christ’s Sacraments, Christ’s commandments, Christ’s Body, and Christ’s Bishops, then what remains of Christ have they kept?

They may not have intended to throw out Christ, but when they threw out His Church (which is His Body) they did.
First of all you know as a former Protestant that your contention here is not accepted as true by Protestants. You say it is true, we say it’s not. No agreement there. In addition, and as acknowledged by your Church, we are Christians. We believe in Christ, we follow Him as we understand him (as do you) and the Holy Spirt works in and among us. As Christ himself affirmed: where two or three are gathered in His name, there He is also. Did you not know Jesus when you were Protestant?

Protestants and Catholics do not agree on a number of very important issues, but whether we are both Christians should not be among them.
 
Peter was ordained by Christ to be chief shepherd of the Church. (John 21:15-19)
If you can find the word “chief” anyplace in John 21, let alone in Jesus’ conversation with Peter, I’ll buy your plane ticket so you can visit the Vatican.
His successors are the Popes of that specific Catholic Church whose headquarters are still in Rome today.
True enough.
It became “Roman Catholic” when Peter arrived in Rome.
I expect that Peter would cringe at that understanding. I suspect that is the result of reading back into history. Just like in the US there are people who think that the Civil War was about free the slaves, or WW2 was about the Holocaust of the Jews. Neither of those was true at the time, they have become true only in our subsequet redacting of history. The same thing has happened with this belief you espouse.
 
Did you not know Jesus when you were Protestant?
I knew something of Him, yes. (I was under the impression that He was a kind of majick faery - I didn’t realize that He had an actual body.) But as soon as I found out about the history of my Church, I knew enough to leave it and become a member of the Church that my Jesus founded.

My ardent desire to follow Jesus when I was Protestant is what caused me to become a Catholic, because I recognized Him in the breaking of the bread. (Luke24:13-35) 🙂
 
Grace Seeker, there is no “invisible Church” on Earth there is one visible church headed by the Pope in Rome with Christ as its Eternal Head.
There can only be one head. Either the Church is headed by Christ, or it is headed by the Pope. I submit it is headed by Christ and thus includes all who belong to Christ.
 
I knew something of Him, yes. (I was under the impression that He was a kind of majick faery - I didn’t realize that He had an actual body.) But as soon as I found out about the history of my Church, I knew enough to leave it and become a member of the Church that my Jesus founded.

My ardent desire to follow Jesus when I was Protestant is what caused me to become a Catholic, because I recognized Him in the breaking of the bread. (Luke24:13-35) 🙂
Cool. Then it is so good that you have become a Roman Catholic. Because if you understood Jesus as only some sort of magic fairy while a member of a protestant church, then you did not understand Jesus at all. So it is good that you have found the truth about Jesus in Roman Catholicism. However, the fact that you were in error while a Protestant does not mean the Protestantism itself is in error. One does not follow from the other.
 
Cool. Then it is so good that you have become a Roman Catholic. Because if you understood Jesus as only some sort of magic fairy while a member of a protestant church, then you did not understand Jesus at all. So it is good that you have found the truth about Jesus in Roman Catholicism. However, the fact that you were in error while a Protestant does not mean the Protestantism itself is in error. One does not follow from the other.
Where is the physically living body of Christ in Protestantism?

Doesn’t Protestantism actually teach that Jesus is a pure spirit who can be everywhere at once?
 
There can only be one head. Either the Church is headed by Christ, or it is headed by the Pope.
This is a false dichotomy. Jesus Christ appoints the Pope to be the earthly leader of the Church. The Pope follows Jesus. The Pope is to Jesus as Eliakim the son of Hilkiah was to Solomon. (See Isaiah 22:20-22)

The Pope appoints Bishops. These Bishops follow the Pope and Jesus. These are the men who teach us the meaning of the Scriptures and the Tradition. They also provide us with discipline in the church, so that all things may be done decently and in order, as St. Paul said to the Corinthians (I Corinthians 14:40).
 
This is a false dichotomy. Jesus Christ appoints the Pope to be the earthly leader of the Church. The Pope follows Jesus. The Pope is to Jesus as Eliakim the son of Hilkiah was to Solomon. (See Isaiah 22:20-22)

The Pope appoints Bishops. These Bishops follow the Pope and Jesus. These are the men who teach us the meaning of the Scriptures and the Tradition. They also provide us with discipline in the church, so that all things may be done decently and in order, as St. Paul said to the Corinthians (I Corinthians 14:40).
This is not what God ordained. This is what humans designed from what God ordained. Protestant churches can have just as much order to them (the Anglican Communion or the United Methodist Church for example) as the Roman Catholic Church and the Roman Catholic Church can have just as much anarchy as any protestant church (the Anglican Communion or the United Methodist Church for example).
 
By your own post: “non-Catholic Christans…are joined in an imperfect manner to the Church.”

You’ve said two things I agree with:
  1. We are Christians.
  2. We are joined to the Church. (you did not say the Roman Catholic Church).
If we are Christians and joined to the Church, how can you say that we are not a part of the body? In so doing, it is Roman Catholics who break the spirit of the scripture Paul articulates in 1 Corinthians 12. Even the teachings of the Roman Catholic Church itself are against you on this matter. Either we are brothers and sisters together in Christ or we are not. If we are not, it is not because we protested the authority of the Church, it is because you have dismissed us. For as much as we may disagree over authority and a few other points of doctrine, we do not deny that we are still brothers and sisters in Christ. But the authority to make the declaration does not belong to the Roman Catholic Church, it belongs to God and God alone – not to Christ’s vicar on earth. The keys of hell may have been turned over to Peter, but not the keys to heaven. If Christ accepts us, and he does, then who are you or anyone else to turn aside that which Christ has accepted.

At minimum, it is arrogance. Beyond that, such a view itself borders on heresy.
This is just an error (saying all Christians are not part of the Body). All believers are members of the Body of Christ, and this is what Catholicism teaches. It cannot be considered heresy. Heresy is when one has been properly taught matters of faith then willfully rejects them.
 
This is not what God ordained.
This is what Jesus Christ ordained. Read your New Testament. The Apostles were in charge of the Church. Peter was the lead Apostle. Jesus founded the Catholic Church, and set Peter and the other Apostles in charge of it. They in turn appointed successors - the Pope and his Bishops.
Code:
* Jn 15:16 - Jesus chose special men to be his Apostles.
* Jn 20:21 - Jesus gave the Apostles his own mission.
* Lk 22:29-30 - Jesus gave them a kingdom.
* Mt 16:18 - Jesus built His Church on Peter, the rock.
* Jn 10:16 - one shepherd to shepherd Christ's sheep.
* Lk 22:32, Jn 21:17 - Peter appointed to be chief shepherd.
* Eph 4:11 - church leaders are hierarchical.
* 1 Tim 3:1, 8; 5:17 - identifies role of bishops, priests and deacons.
* Tit 1:5 - commission for bishops to ordain priests.
  • Mt 28:18-20 - Jesus delegates all power to Apostles.
    • Jn 20:23 - power to forgive sins.
    • 1 Cor 11:23-24 - power to offer sacrifice (Eucharist).
    • Lk 10:16 - power to speak with Christ’s voice.
    • Mt 18:18 - power to legislate.
    • Mt 18:17 - power to discipline.
(Taken from The Church and Peter; An Apologists Bible Cheat Sheet)
 
Rome, one of the Apostolic churches founded by Christ’s most glorious apostles Peter & Paul, is the epitome of the Christian Church. It is the president of the Church. Other churches, such as the Eastern-Rite Catholic Churches are also part of that same Universal Church whose founders were other apostles besides Peter & Paul
Actually, Peter and Paul founded the Eastern Churches first, and went to Rome last, and died there.

Acts 11:25-26
25 So Barnabas went to Tarsus to look for Saul; 26 and when he had found him, he brought him to Antioch. For a whole year they met with the church, and taught a large company of people; and in Antioch the disciples were for the first time called Christians.

Acts 9:32-33

32 Now as Peter went here and there among them all, he came down also to the saints that lived at Lydda.

Acts 9:38-39
38 Since Lydda was near Joppa, the disciples, hearing that Peter was there, sent two men to him entreating him, “Please come to us without delay.” 39 So Peter rose and went with them.

Acts 15:7
"Brethren, you know that in the early days God made choice among you, that by my mouth the Gentiles should hear the word of the gospel and believe.
 
No! That just is not true. The catholic church is the body of Christ. It includes all Christians. It is not the exclusive pervue of a few (or the many millions) that take their marching orders from Rome. All who claim Jesus as both Lord and Savior are catholic.

I will repeat what I’ve already said. When it became Roman Catholic it quit being truly catholic.
I think you are lacking some study of Christian History, Grace Seeker. Also, a distinction needs to be made between Catholic with a big “C” and catholic with a small “c”.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top