The Catholic Church wrong? Part two

[tqualey]

Hi, Joe370,

If the non-Catholics understanding that Jesus is being figurative is to be believed, we would have to say that in order to inherit eternal life, one must revile Jesus, and do evil deeds, and be wicked toward him. This makes no sense to me!

And, it makes no sense to me, eithr.

Thank you for a thorough and well-written explanation.

God bless

 

[fbl9]

I believe all Catholics should read a book about the Early Christian Fathers. What was the church first like. We must undrstand the Hebrew sacrifice and then understand where Jesus fits in. He said must must chew his flesh and eat drink his blood. He didn’t say this was symbolic he said it actual. It was such a powerful message that many disciples left him. This brought me back to the Catholic Church. This is the only way to cleanse our sins. Jesus declared no man is good. We must be totally cleansed by the blood and present ourselves with a totally white cloak. There can be no little sins on our perfectly white robe. God does not demand good he demands perfection. Substantiation is the reason the Catholic church is the true church-and through all our human messups-has remaiined loyal in our message.

Find your strentgh in God because we got one heck of a fight very near.

There yuh go Burger could be an ineresting thread…But it could also come off as a “baiting” thread or another :banghead: uch: thread.

 

[a_burger]

How could it be a baiting? You would find informaton such as it was considered to be a cult if you don’t recognize the Eucharist as the actual body and blood of Christ. Actually it started as a cult that said that Jesus wasn’t man but fully God and he never felt any pain on the cross. How is that baiting? Anyone who would read the book would see that the Catholic Church has stood by the early church. This is called apologetics.