T
Tomster
Guest
No complete view of Christ our Lord is possible without considering his relationship to the Church. There is a sense in which the Church is actually included in the “whole Christ” - the Christus totus of St. Augustine. My thoughts will be centered upon Christ’s work of establishing the Church and the role he assigned to it. We know that he gathered about him a group of disciples, men who acknowledged him as the “Master,” (Matthew 8:19; Luke 9:57) and were willing to taught by him how best they might serve God. They were of mixed quality: some, like Nicodemus and Joseph of Arimathea, could not bring themselves to amke a public profession of their loyalty; others seem only to have been occasional followers (Matthew 15:32; Mark 8:2); others again were half-hearted and proved to be deserters (John 6:66). Only a few were prepared to give unqualified allegiance, so embracing a way of life which involved the severing of family ties (Matthew 8:22), together with the acceptance of the hardships and privations endured by the Lord himself (Matthew 8: 19-20). It was from such men as these last that he chose the select company of twelve who were to be the foundations of his Church.
It will be remembered how this inner circle of disciples were the favored audience for the Sermon on the Mount. Likewise it was they who could be relied on to discern the inner meaning of the parables. St. Mark makes clear how deliberate the choice had been; Jesus “called to him those whom it pleased him to call.” (Mark 3:13) The twelve were not self appointed volunteers; they had been the object of a special election on the part of the Master himself, as he was later to remind them. “It was not you that chose me, it was I that chose you. The task I have appointed you is to go out and bear fruit, fruit which will endure.” (John 15:16,19) To St. Luke we owe the details that the momentous choice had been preceded by a night spent in prayer, and that it was our Lord himself who gave to the selected twelve the official title of “apostles.” (Luke 6:12-13) The frequent use of the phrase “the twelve” shows that this group was quite distinct from the rest of disciples; they formed a “college” united to one another by the common bond of their calling and the work committed to their charge. In closest contact with the Master, they were especially trained by him; they heard his discourses, received from him private instructions, witnessed his miracles; in a word, they were repositories of “the mystery of the kingdom of God.” (Mark 4:11) As Christ himself was God’s Ambassador - not a servant but the Son (Matthew 21:33 ff); not one of the prophets but the Messianic Son of God (Matthew 16:13 ff; Hebrews 1:1-3) and in this sense the “apostle” par excellence (Hebrews 3:1) - so in his turn he appointed these disciples his own ambassadors. During his lifetime they enjoyed but a limited commission (Mark 6:7-13; Luke 9:1-6), as shepherds of the lost sheep and workers in the Lord’s vineyard. (Matthew 9:35-38) After his death they would enter with full rights upon their ministry, as authorized representatives of Christ.
continued
It will be remembered how this inner circle of disciples were the favored audience for the Sermon on the Mount. Likewise it was they who could be relied on to discern the inner meaning of the parables. St. Mark makes clear how deliberate the choice had been; Jesus “called to him those whom it pleased him to call.” (Mark 3:13) The twelve were not self appointed volunteers; they had been the object of a special election on the part of the Master himself, as he was later to remind them. “It was not you that chose me, it was I that chose you. The task I have appointed you is to go out and bear fruit, fruit which will endure.” (John 15:16,19) To St. Luke we owe the details that the momentous choice had been preceded by a night spent in prayer, and that it was our Lord himself who gave to the selected twelve the official title of “apostles.” (Luke 6:12-13) The frequent use of the phrase “the twelve” shows that this group was quite distinct from the rest of disciples; they formed a “college” united to one another by the common bond of their calling and the work committed to their charge. In closest contact with the Master, they were especially trained by him; they heard his discourses, received from him private instructions, witnessed his miracles; in a word, they were repositories of “the mystery of the kingdom of God.” (Mark 4:11) As Christ himself was God’s Ambassador - not a servant but the Son (Matthew 21:33 ff); not one of the prophets but the Messianic Son of God (Matthew 16:13 ff; Hebrews 1:1-3) and in this sense the “apostle” par excellence (Hebrews 3:1) - so in his turn he appointed these disciples his own ambassadors. During his lifetime they enjoyed but a limited commission (Mark 6:7-13; Luke 9:1-6), as shepherds of the lost sheep and workers in the Lord’s vineyard. (Matthew 9:35-38) After his death they would enter with full rights upon their ministry, as authorized representatives of Christ.
continued