The clergy abuse scandal: homosexuality or pedophilia?

[SaintGobban]

There is so much of this kind of diffusing, confusing, obscuring, minimizing, disinformation out there (I’m referring to the craziness of the above post).

The John Jay report doesn’t want to call what happened pedophelia because most of the male victims were 11-14 years old.

Therefore, the only thing left to call it is homosexual behavior, which it unarguably is.

Let’s just say that ALL homosexuals do not abuse pubescent boys.

But men who abuse pubescent boys are homosexuals.

If there were no homosexual priests, there would be fewer than 5% of the cases of priestly abuse than now exist.

If there were no homosexual priests in the hierarchy, maybe there wouldn’t have been so many instances of covering for the guilty. Assume that much of that was homosexuals covering for other homosexuals, and their homosexual acts on minors.

 

[SaintGobban]

Actually, the majority of pedophiles are heterosexual, not homosexual.

That’s a total LIE.

Homosexual preditors perpetrate on MALES, not females…

Almost ALL sexual preditors are males and male victims outnumber female victims by a ratio of 2:1. That’s a more incomprehensible way of saying that 67% of abuse victims are boys. Consider that in the context that 1% of the population is homosexual.

Let’s repeat: 1 percent (homosexual) is perpetrating 67% of the crimes against minors…

In the case of priestly abuse, the number of male victims was over 80%.
The number of priest who abused exclusively females was 5%.

The percent of male victims over 11 years old was over 75%.

Homosexual priests are the direct cause of the child abuse scandal.

Homosexual bishops are the direct cause of the cover up.

If we continue to lie about this nothing will improve.