A
Ahlman
Guest
Traditionally, there are just three different parts (+, I and II) in the proclamation of the passion of Jesus at Palm Sunday and Good Friday. But I have seen than in many parishes (including EWTN), it has been seen fitting that the whole congregation would read the parts of II that consists of a crowd of people speaking. Even at the Palm Sunday Mass at St Peter Square a choire sings these parts instead of a deacon. So even if the Missal doesn’t mention any distinction between single speakers and crowds, it seems so be quite well accepted (and logical, not to say the least). But wouldn’t it technically be a liturgical abuse, if the Missal doesn’t say anything about it?
In any case, you need to mark specifically yourself the parts where the whole congregation are supposed to participate, or else they wouldn’t know when to speak and when just the lector that represents the single speakers are supposed to read. We tried this at my parish today, but unfortunately the congregation didn’t really get the distinction between single speakers and the crowd and read all of part II. Is this probably going to be revised in future editions of the Missal so that the distinction between single speakers and crowds will be clear?
In any case, you need to mark specifically yourself the parts where the whole congregation are supposed to participate, or else they wouldn’t know when to speak and when just the lector that represents the single speakers are supposed to read. We tried this at my parish today, but unfortunately the congregation didn’t really get the distinction between single speakers and the crowd and read all of part II. Is this probably going to be revised in future editions of the Missal so that the distinction between single speakers and crowds will be clear?