The Crucifixion versus the Passover Sacrifice

  • Thread starter Thread starter Thom18
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Jesus celebrated the Paschal meal at the prescribed time as the synoptic Gospels state. Even in John we get the impression that the meal was a Passover meal.

This is how Aquinas understood it:
And then in the morning of the next day he was brought to the praetorium. Why then do we read so that they might eat the passover, since it was the day after the passover? Some of the modem Greeks say that we are now on the fourteenth lunar day of the month, and that Christ was crucified on the day the Jews celebrated the passover, but that Christ anticipated the passover by one day, since he knew he would be killed on the day of the Jewish passover. Thus, he celebrated the passover on the thirteenth lunar day, in the evening. And since the law commanded that the Jews should not have leavened bread from the fourteenth day of the first month to the twenty‑first day, they say that Christ consecrated leavened bread.

This is not acceptable for two reasons. First, the Old Testament has no instance where anyone was permitted to anticipate the celebration of the passover. But if one was prevented, he could postpone it to the next month: "If any man of you or of your descendants is unclean … he shall still keep the passover to the Lord. In the second month on the fourteenth day in the evening they shall keep it "(Num 9:10). And since Christ never omitted any observance of the law, it is not true to say that he anticipated the passover. Secondly, Mark (14:12) states explicitly that Christ came on the first day of Unleavened Bread, when they sacrificed the passover lamb; and Matthew says that “on the first day of Unleavened Bread the disciples came to Jesus saying, ‘Where will you have us prepare for you to eat the passover?’” (Mt 26:17). So, we should not say that Christ anticipated the passover.

Therefore we should say with Jerome, Augustine and other Latin Fathers, that the fourteenth day is the beginning of the feast; but the passover refers not just to that evening, but to the entire time of the seven days during which they ate unleavened bread, which was to be eaten by those who were clean.[16] And because the Jews would have contracted uncleanness by entering the residence of a foreign judge, they did not enter so that they might not be defiled, but might eat the passover, that is, the unleavened bread.
 
Last edited:
Jesus celebrated the Paschal meal at the prescribed time as the synoptic Gospels state. Even in John we get the impression that the meal was a Passover meal.
It wouldn’t have been possible according to Scholars who traced back to the time frame of Jesus.

The Synoptic Gospels most likely spoke of a Passover Meal as celebrated by Jesus earlier, or, they used a different calendar in their writing.

I think Pope Benedict XVI gave a very good explanation of the contradictions between the Synoptic Gospels and the Gospel of John and he wrote that John seems to be the more chronologically accurate.

We have a lot more information that St Aquinas had in his day, so I wouldn’t be using his estimates in how we understand the Gospels today.

Jim
 
It wouldn’t have been possible according to Scholars who traced back to the time frame of Jesus.
Some scholars say this and others say that. There are many scholars who say otherwise in recent times. Maybe you could provide links to those scholars.

jimmyakin.com/was-the-last-supper-a-passover-meal
www.agapebiblestudy.com/documents/Jesus_Last_Week_in_Jerusalem_Countdown_to_Passion.htm


And there are many things in John that imply a Passover meal taking place.
 
The Synoptic Gospels most likely spoke of a Passover Meal as celebrated by Jesus earlier, or, they used a different calendar in their writing.
Matthew 26:17
On the first day of the Festival of Unleavened Bread, the disciples came to Jesus and asked, “Where do you want us to make preparations for you to eat the Passover?”

Mark 14:12
On the first day of the Festival of Unleavened Bread, when it was customary to sacrifice the Passover lamb, Jesus’ disciples asked him, “Where do you want us to go and make preparations for you to eat the Passover?”

Luke 22:7
Then came the day of Unleavened Bread on which the Passover lamb had to be sacrificed.

So, according to the Synoptics, Jesus celebrated the Pasch on the prescribed day.
 
The links are in Pope Benedict’s book, Jesus of Nazareth, which isn’t online.

Jim
 
Hence the contradictions which Pope Benedict XVI tries to work out in his book.

Theories on the exact chronology are not absolute, but the fact remains, the Synoptic Gospels are in contradiction to what John’s Gospel has in regards to the time of Jesus Last Supper, crucifixion and death.

Jim
 
And those contradictions have been dealt with in a better way than what Pope Benedict suggested.
 
Pope Benedict XVI isn’t suggesting it, he’s stating what is known historically about the event.

You have a problem with it, take it up with Him. He’s still in Rome, as far as I know. 😓
 
They’re literal interpretations from Scripture.

Pope Benedict XVI, did a good job providing commentary providing the historical explanations based on what is currently known, as to why there is a difference between the Synoptic Gospel’s and St John’s Gospel.

Jim
 
Not if the convening of the Last Supper did not occur until evening.
 
What does that have to do with the differences between the Synoptic Gospels and St John’s Gospel ?

Jim
 
We have to be open and honest and admit we don’t know for certain how to reconcile the different timelines between the synoptic and St John’s gospel. I have read our holy father’s book Jesus of Nazareth and its a brilliant book. I recall he gives plausible explanations but not definite.

Another scholar Michal Hunt suggests Passover is a generic term used to cover the seven day feast of unleavened bread as well as Passover (once used by Josephus in his book) similar to the way we use the term Easter from Saturday-Monday. The time the lambs were being slaughtered in St John’s gospel could be the same time the afternoon Tamid sacrifice was being prepared not the actual Passover. This to me is the most probable explanation.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top