The CUlture of Death, time to know what you are talking about

  • Thread starter Thread starter ega
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Mom of one:
Shame on the bears then, for eating fish. After all, it may potentially make the fish become extinct.
When there are too many eaters the food source crashes. This is followed by a bounce from the original food population if it hasnt gone extinct (seen a living dodo recently).

I have to assume people starving to death due to over population is acceptable to you because that is what you are defending.
 
40.png
ega:
When there are too many eaters the food source crashes. This is followed by a bounce from the original food population if it hasnt gone extinct (seen a living dodo recently).

I have to assume people starving to death due to over population is acceptable to you because that is what you are defending.
Well, you know what they say about assuming. When you assume, you make an …(not sure if rules allow me to finish the rest of the sentence)

I am not defending people starving to death. I am critizing the extreme reasoning that people will go to to say that certain things are OK. Population is not the problem. People are not the problem. (Well, not most of them anyway:rolleyes: ) A few examples:

I have a friend from Nigeria. People are starving in her country, even though there is oil. The “leaders” of her country have 99.9% of the country’s wealth from oil, while the others starve or die from diseases that can be treated. So, is the problem the people, or the leaders selfishness and greed? I’m sure that if the country let itself die out, the leaders would be very happy----all the more money for themselves.

I just read an article about a man who invented a method of irrigation for an African country that was very dry(can’t remember if this was due to a drought or if this was fairly normal) The people were starving. He worked on a method of irrigation that dramatically improved the people’s food production. He could have said—let them die out. Instead, he helped them better their lives.
 
40.png
Vanny:
Children are our future-no children, no future.

BINGO

In an aging population, where no children are born- there is an increasing number of elderly-this puts a huge strain on the younger worker.

If you dont exploit your kids to look after you, this is a non-issue.

Even now, much more of of a younger workers taxes, ect go to pay for old age pensions and programs for the elderly.

Expect a lower living of standard in your old age and the problem decreases.

This will only get worse oif people stopped having children
You see, it is our children who will care for you in your old age, pay your Social Security pension, wheel you in your wheelchair in the nursing home.

Fear of the future, and using your children to care for you is not an excuse

YOu need young poeple to fill jobs, to be doctors, nurses, police, firefighters, scientists,teachers,

Not if there is no furture…

Young people are the vitality of a civilization.

Not if you dont have civilisation.

Of course, older people have much value, too, but I think the real problem we will be facing soon is depopulation- not the other way around.

6.5 billion people?

Even a disease that wiped out 99.99% of the human population would leave enough to get us into the same mess in < 50,000 years.

No disease is that good.

My children have enriched my life in ways I could never imagined before I had children.

Slefish reason, you got something out of it so the rest be damned.

You can’t be selfish when you have a child-

Never read the selfish gene did we?

The cry of “what about me” becomes the cry of “what about my child”

And so on, read the whole site, you’re responses have been dealt with.
 
Mom of one:
Population is not the problem. People are not the problem.

I’ll get back to you when I have finished laughing and got some sleep.
 
40.png
ega:
I’ll get back to you when I have finished laughing and got some sleep.
As I said earlier, does my high IQ allow me to be as condesending as you?
 
Aga,

First, I assure you, I did not intend to be ironic, humorous, or unaware in my post. I sincerely feel your pain, as I once thought along the same lines as you (although perhaps slightly less fervently).
40.png
ega:
I find spiders, scorpions, snakes, tigers, bears, poppies, dogs, squid, fish, oaks, and many things beautiful.

Should all perish? Are you not ‘distraught’ at the fate of the creatures that are extinct by our actions and will become extinct by our actions?
I don’t recall suggesting that I don’t love all the above, or suggesting that should be allowed to become extinct.

I do believe you are mistaken as to their fate, even if things are left as they are. I state this, not as an uninformed, uncaring, materialistic capitalist. I am educated in the sciences, do not believe that we should throw a man made solution on every environmental problem, and I love the world we have been given to protect. I do not believe that all of humanity recognizes our immense responsibility to protect that which is around us, but I think by mere nature of our intelligence and our ability to make global impact, we have such a responsibility, even if I didn’t believe so from a Christian perspective.

I think that perhaps you misunderstand the Christian perspective in the distinctly Catholic understanding of our responsibility towards the planet. As a Catholic, I believe that mankind is responsible to be a good steward of the planet, including resources and other life. This particular teaching is not always well integrated into other non-Catholic Christian philosophies. Please forgive me for adhereing to a kinder, gentler approach to the world than what you appear to suppose.
40.png
ega:
I have to assume you are bing ironic or humorous. You cannot possibly weight up all of the earth against the birth of a ‘beautiful’ child. A child at least has a chance, but what of the lesser intellects, both human and bestial that you have so monstrously dismissed?
Again, I don’t recall suggesting I do put a child, as beautiful as a child is, above the earth. I believe children are a resource to the earth and that as such, we have value to offer the world, rather than, as you see it. I do not accept that humanity is a drag on the planet by the very nature of our existance.
40.png
ega:
Are, excuses to torture eachother and lesser beings. I love religious ‘reasoning’.
I would never suggest that because pain exists that it is appropriate to inflict it on others. It is a part of life, the result of our fall from Grace, a consequence of sin. Satan, in his lies, draws mankind into taking actions that harm one another and the world at large. I realize that the concept of a spiritual being in conflict with all that is good is probably one you don’t acknowledge. I do believe this is true, and I think he gains a lot in allowing you and many in our culture to disbelieve in his existance.
40.png
ega:
What do you think God promised animals and plants? “A life of perpetual fear, pressure and extermination in mine name, by my people.”
I don’t believe that mankind is intended in any way to be such a threat to the rest of the world. I also believe that on the whole, we’re not nearly as bad as you have been led to believe. Have there been problems? Heck ya! Are some of them whoppers? You betcha!

But I think you’re taking things out of perspective, missing the big picture. Humanity has lived in harmony with nature for thousands of years, and has shown an amazing ability to improve their ability to produce the resources necessary to feed humanity without destroying the world we live in. Issues that I was told could never be solved in time, have been resolved.

The growth of population that I was told was out of control, has been reversed. Europe is in declining population, except for the influx of immigrants.
40.png
ega:
Argument for the article, I think you’ll find.
The concerns I listed are those which I previously held, but which I have subsequently come to realized were all based on misinformation. For me to go into details on each and every refutation would exceed the limits of a post and the interests of most who participate in these forums.
40.png
ega:
And then you forgot.
What did I forget?
40.png
ega:
But you did not go macro in your reasoning. Kept it small and human, individual. Didnt think about the big picture. And so became part of the problem.
We disagree here. I pray that you seek a bigger truth than the one you seem committed to holding.

cont…
 
… continued …
40.png
ega:
The right of the unborn to stay that way was never a consideration to anyone. I doubt you can even imagine it.
What makes you the expert on what the unborn desire? Are you suggesting that you wish you had never been born, so that you wouldn’t need to have this conversation? I think you have much of value to offer the world. I believe that even if I don’t know the details, that there is much good you have already accomplished in your life. Should I assume that some other, unborn child should not be given the opportunity to live their life? No, I don’t presume to know that a child would prefer to never live, as I’ve yet to know someone who has consistantly wished that they had never existed (this is not to say that there are times, in depression, when someone might feel this way in passing or even for a sustained period of time). But I believe all people have the potential of living a good life.
40.png
ega:
The biggest victims dont have a voice and are dismissed by your faith as things without immortal souls and who’s suffering is secondary.
Yes, I do acknowledge that I believe that non-humans do not have immortal souls. As compared to the suffering of a human, I do accept that the suffering of an animal is lower on the scale.
40.png
ega:
Sounds like special pleading to me. The pain of the planet is clear and all you can think is ‘we are special’. Greeat! I have an IQ of 152 on a good day, does that mean I have the right to rape?
I don’t suggest that our intelligence allows anyone the right to dominate another. But that we were created by a loving God, in God’s image that differentiates us from the rest of creation. And I don’t recall suggesting that we have the right to rape anyone or anything, animate or inanimate.
40.png
ega:
Personal gratification is no excuse.
Sorry, I don’t see the love of a mother for her child to be personal gratification. True mothers loves is extremely self sacrificing, although I must admit, it is also satisfying.
40.png
ega:
Lets pray together for objective substantial improvement…and the acceptance of condoms and other contraceptives as the right and moral way forward.
Sorry, while I’m fine with praying for objective and substantial improvement in the world (much of which I have already seen in my lifetime. Do you know that there was a time not very long ago when the rivers of our nation were “polluted beyond repair” and yet they have indeed bounced back to once again supporting wildlife?), but I cannot join you in a prayer that condoms or contraceptives be accepted as I know that they are fundamentally flawed in their understanding of who we are as human beings. The marital embrace is both unitive (brings together two individuals in a unique way) and procreative (functions to bring new life into the world). I won’t take the opportunity to get into this at this point, as I can see you’re not on the same page.

God Bless you. You are a valuable person, deserving of the dignity of your life.

CARose
 
What I should have said is that having a child has made me a better person- it has knocked the selfishness right out of me.
YOu can’t be selfish and properly care for a child.
Their needs MUST come first- above and beyond your needs.
You need patience- you must not lose your cool when they are throwing fits -you must decern what they need with love.
You put your own sleep needs aside when they wake up for 2as, 3am feedings-this goes on for many years.
Before children life was about me, me me,and my desires.
Getting married helps a little-but have a child and you are completly responible for that new human being.
It’s taught me patience, fortitude and courage- now of course, people can have these without having children, but selfish me needed to be taught them through life and my wonderful children.
As a Christian its only helped with my Sanctification.
God wants people to be here- he wants us to care for the earth- I believe it can be done with balance.
 
40.png
ega:
When there are too many eaters the food source crashes.
You really must stop reading Paul Ehrlich’s book, The Population Bomb. That is the source for all this over population panic.

it was written in 1968 and He was proven wrong.

Ehrlich went way beyond by predicting famine and disaster on a scale unprecedented in world history. In the prologue to The Population Bomb he wrote, “The battle to feed all of humanity is over. In the 1970s and 1980s hundreds of millions of people will starve to death in spite of any crash programs embarked upon now. At this late date nothing can prevent a substantial increase in the world death rate…”

In fact the last quarter of the 20th century has been amazing for the reduction in famine. By 2001 only about 2 million people will have died from famine-related causes.

Compare the end of the 20th century with the end of the 19th century. Twenty to twenty-five million people died of famine related causes from 1875 to 1901, in a world whose population was only one-half to one-third as large.

Beebs
 
Ega -

Just curious - why all this negativity in the name of morality? :confused:
 
40.png
Tonks40:
Ega -

Just curious - why all this negativity in the name of morality? :confused:
ask him what’s the authority of morality first since he’s an atheist. he only knows the existence of the word “morality” but he doesn’t know the meaning of the word.
 
Ega,

A very wise person once taught us that we need to define our terms in order to have an intelligent coversation.

Since you have been so abusive and hateful in your posts, apparently a chosen behavior, in using your own favorite word, I have to “:assume” that maybe you don’t have the intelligence you so try to personify? Are you just spewing hatred for its own sake or do you have an intelligent point to make other than to say that your own idea of “morality” is the one everything should be relative to?

I’m offended by your remarks. Any attack upon the life of a child is offensive, even if hypothetically.

I would furthermore suggest that you define the terms you use before attacking those who disagree with you.

I also have to ask, and I speak for us faithful Catholics here, what yardstick you use to determine morality?

For example, if I want to measure the length and depth of, say, a human brain, I take out a standard ruler and use, say, the metric system and define the size of the brain in centimetres. I then weigh the brain using volume and kilograms. There is a set system there which cannot be changed, and that standard remains no matter what is measured against it.

So what is your yardstick? Can you please define it? What are the limitations? How do you gauge what you term “morality”?

Where does human life weigh on your scale?

And on another level…does the fact that I used the example of a human body part mean anything to you? Do you know that there is far more to that brain than can be measured? That we as human beings were given gifts from God above that plants and animals were not given? Where does that fit on your scale?

Where, exactly, did life begin and when, exactly, did people with your ideology get the idea that humankind gets to mess with the gene pool and “decide” when the earth has taken too much? You contradict yourself…for on one hand you exalt humanity, yet on the other hand you cripple humanity and show complete disregard for the ability of humanity to actually overcome the alleged problems of “overpopulation”.

Really…we are all very interested in trying to figure out where you come from, how you arrived at these ideas, and what in the world made you behave in such a hateful manner.
 
ega, I looked at that site, and guess what Einstein? The only one’s that are going to be extinct are the one’s who think like you.
The rest of us will still be here, thank God.
Me thinks some of the people on that site have had one too many “happy thoughts”. :whacky:
Prayers go out to you all. :gopray2:
 
40.png
abcdefg:
I can’t get a good sleep after laughing. ega, I pray you can.😃
I did make me laugh too, I have to admit.

It may be the futility of asking people not to breed when we know they cant help themselves…but then that is exactly the same funniness as ‘abstinence programs’ to prevent unwanted preggers and HIV infections, dont you think?
😃 😃 😃
 
40.png
Jeffrey:
Please do… and while you are at it… learn some respect.
from above your post…

ask him what’s the authority of morality first since he’s an atheist. he only knows the existence of the word “morality” but he doesn’t know the meaning of the word.

I think it was Della who complained I ‘had no arguments just abuse’, but failed to pass comments on the abusive posts directed at me.

Luckily, irony is seldom deadly, unless it’s an irony girder falling from a bit of height.

Anyway, next comes some serious postings.

I bring you the mysteries of Easter Isle…soon.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top