The Da Vinci Code: Do You Have The Antidote?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Fidelis
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
F

Fidelis

Guest
Concerned about the misinformation that is bound to be sown by the upcoming release of the blasphemous movie version of the infamous best-seller? Then do something about it!

This website below has everything you need to offer either an information night or multi-week parish study exploring the ludicrous yet toxic claims made by this story. It is high quality and solidly Catholic. Be part of the solution!:

Da Vinci Outreach
davinciantidote.com/default.asp

.
 
The biggest antidote for me is basically the same thing: don’t read the book, period. Saves you money, plus you won’t have to worry about getting headaches.
 
How can one criticize a novel that he has not bothered to read, or a film that he has not taken the time to see? Catholics, it seems to me, do well to stear clear of such knee-jerk, reactionary impulses and leave this kind of non-thinking to the protestant fundamentalists.

By reading the novel (or viewing the film) for oneself, one earns the right to an opinion on its content. By taking refuge in pietistic anti-intellectualism, one forfeits that right.

By the way, Fidelis, that’s an interesting website. Thanks.

Truly,
Don
 
Well, I don’t think we have to read every bit of tripe that comes down the pike. We can easily refute it because it’s a load of nonsense.

I saw a really good program about the Da Vinci Code on the Discovery Channel in which they proved, quite conclusively, that it is nothing but nonsense. I have no doubt it’s for sale already.
 
a good belly laugh comes to mind, with the words “that is a jolly good story my friend, but far from reality or the truth”
 
40.png
Donald45:
How can one criticize a novel that he has not bothered to read, or a film that he has not taken the time to see? Catholics, it seems to me, do well to stear clear of such knee-jerk, reactionary impulses and leave this kind of non-thinking to the protestant fundamentalists.

By reading the novel (or viewing the film) for oneself, one earns the right to an opinion on its content. By taking refuge in pietistic anti-intellectualism, one forfeits that right.

By the way, Fidelis, that’s an interesting website. Thanks.

Truly,
Don
The problem in my mind with this is giving money to that man or his publisher.

I did read the novel, I borrowed it from someone - though you could get it from the library. I will not give him, his publishers, or the studio that produces it any money by going to see the movie. I will watch it when it comes on cable I suppose.

While I agree that it is difficult to critize something without reading it, Dan Brown writes on page one of The DaVinci Code:
** FACT:**
Code:
                      *http://www.danbrown.com/images/transparent.gif***The              Priory of Sion****—a European secret society founded in 1099—is              a real organization**. In 1975, Paris's *Bibliothèque Nationale*              discovered parchments known as* Les Dossiers Secrets*, identifying              numerous **members of the Priory of Sion, including Sir Isaac Newton,              Botticelli, Victor Hugo, and Leonardo da Vinci.**
Code:
                      http://www.danbrown.com/images/transparent.gifThe Vatican prelature known as Opus Dei is a deeply devout Catholic group that has been the topic of recent controversy due to **reports of brain-washing,              coercion, and a practice known as "corporal mortification." **Opus Dei has just completed construction of a $47 million National Headquarters at 243 Lexington Avenue in New York City.
Code:
                      **A****ll              descriptions of artwork, architecture, documents, and secret rituals              in this novel are accurate.**
This alone should be enough to say this is pure fantasy at best, or scandalous drivel at worst. He tries to say Jesus was married, had children, and their descendants have been hunted into near extinction by the Catholic Church for 2,000 years to hide this secret - and all for power and money.

We know the Priory of Sion was formed in 1975 by a con artist in France, so we know it was impossible to Isaac Newton and DaVinci to be members since they were long dead. We know the purpose of Opus Dei is to evangelize, their website says:
Opus Dei provides spiritual formation aimed at helping people develop their spiritual life and apostolate. These activities are held in Opus Dei centers or in a church, office or private home. **Anyone who wishes may participate in Opus Dei’s activities. **
They are open to ALL, and currently have 85,000 members, its pretty hard to be a secret society with 85,000 members.

Mr. Brown also claims, in his novel, that the pyramid in front of the Louvre had 666 panes of glass in it. Here the protagonist reflects that “this pyramid, at President Mitterand’s explicit demand, had been constructed of exactly 666 panes of glass - a bizarre request that had always been a hot topic among conspiracy buffs who claimed 666 was the number of Satan” (p. 21).

The Louvre museum however states that the finished pyramid contains 673 glass panes (603 rhombs and 70 triangles).

If the author cannot get these things straight how can anyone even think of taking his theory that Jesus was human, married to Mary Magdeline - who is some sort of “sacred feminine” goddess, and the Catholic Church has been hunting their descendents ever since seriously.

You don’t have to read the book, just the first few lines to be able to debunk it.
 
The antidote is common sense and less historical credulity, things which are not always found in abundance.

Personally, I’d ignore both the book and the movie rather than give them more customers through condemnation. Still, there is the possibility of using them as a teaching opportunity.
 
In the last day or so, I’ve heard that the book sold 40 million copies. Now, I haven’t read it – but that’s a different story. I tend to avoid books that come along with as much hype as this one. There was way too much hype for me to consider this one. I would have sent it back for a refund. But I digress.

After the book was published, I heard some discussion that it claimed no more than to be a work of fiction. Hello! Is anybody paying attention?

Didn’t the author simply place the book in the same category of speculation as “The Last Temptation of Christ”? and other books about the Holy Grail?

That’s my bias. I don’t need to read books of fiction about Jesus. You know what they say? “just say ‘no’”
 
40.png
MonkeyTape:
You don’t have to read the book, just the first few lines to be able to debunk it.
I know that and YOU know that, but the millions of people who don’t think to dig into the facts, but believe just because it’s in writing there must be some truth to it, DON’T.

For many people, novels, TV and movies are their primary sources of information about most things – including history and religion:

carl-olson.com/articles/la_envoy73_tdvc.html

Those who know the facts have the serious obligation to correct misconceptions that could be harmful to the faith of others.
 
40.png
Donald45:
How can one criticize a novel that he has not bothered to read, or a film that he has not taken the time to see? Catholics, it seems to me, do well to stear clear of such knee-jerk, reactionary impulses and leave this kind of non-thinking to the protestant fundamentalists.

By reading the novel (or viewing the film) for oneself, one earns the right to an opinion on its content. By taking refuge in pietistic anti-intellectualism, one forfeits that right.

By the way, Fidelis, that’s an interesting website. Thanks.

Truly,
Don
I read the book and treated it as fiction. Much like any science fiction story has some fact woven into it, the bottom line is it was meant to be a story not a factual recounting; it is not a documentary.
Of course, Catholics, and anyone else, trying to make it something it isn’t, an attack on our faith, are simply filling Mr. Brown and his Publisher’s collective pocket at about 25 bucks a throw. Since about 25 million books have been sold, they are doing very well financially.
That is my opinion.
 
There is historical fiction, and there is heretical fiction. Had the Gnostics excelled at novels, possibly they would have written this instead of their polemics.
 
40.png
JimG:
There is historical fiction, and there is heretical fiction. Had the Gnostics excelled at novels, possibly they would have written this instead of their polemics.
I know a guy who goes to the same coffee shop that Dan Brown does. With regard to it’s validity, he said he’s laughing all the way to the bank!
 
I get asked about Dan’s book most of the time during talk shows. I explain Dan checked the fiction box when he registered the book with the Library of Congress. I usually go on to say, in my opinion, Alice in Wonderland is a better story, and probably movie. As far as codes, numerology and gematria, pursuing them may be an AntiChrist activity (not keeping Christ first in your heart) and is time probably better spent in prayer with your Creator (fasting, denial of carnal wants and needs would probably not hurt either).
 
40.png
jimbomill:
I read the book and treated it as fiction. Much like any science fiction story has some fact woven into it, the bottom line is it was meant to be a story not a factual recounting; it is not a documentary.
No, it’s not a documentary, but according to its author:

Dan Brown said:
[T]
he secret behind The Da Vinci Code was too well documented and significant for me to dismiss.

– Mark L. Chance.
 
40.png
Fidelis:
I know that and YOU know that, but the millions of people who don’t think to dig into the facts, but believe just because it’s in writing there must be some truth to it, DON’T.

For many people, novels, TV and movies are their primary sources of information about most things – including history and religion:
That’s part of the reason I bothered posting those few things on page one, they are simple and starightforward things that one can use. If Mr. Brown can’t get the number of panes of glass and the age of the Priory of Sion correct then how can something so important as the the divinity of Jesus Christ be entrusted to him?

Mr. Brown chose as the very first word of his novel the word “fact,” he is intentionally misleading people.

I know friends and family that are all too willing to accept almost whatever they hear on TV or read on the internet. I was actually talking briefly about this movie with my sister-in-laws boyfriend a week ago. He said maybe some of it was true, I said something like “they say that the Church has been hunting down and killing the descendents of Christ and Mary Magdalene for centuries” he said “yeah, I’d believe that was true.” That wasn’t sarcastic, he meant it.

I didn’t even know where to start.
 
I can’t believe the ruckus that Catholics are making over the Davinci Code. I read the book, and enjoyed it for what it was…a work of fiction. The only thing you are accomplishing with all of your “debunking” is keeping it in the limelight, and making more money for this author who you supposedly “despise”.

I personally think that these folks who are so adamantly opposed to the Davinci Code must have some kind of financial interest in the book sales, since they have worked so hard to keep it in the news.

I’ve got an idea…why don’t you picket outside the theatres too so that the box office can pull in an extra $10 million on opening weekend.

Demetrios
 
Demetrios has a point. The only bad publicity is no publicity.
Negative buzz is still buzz!
 
40.png
mlchance:
No, it’s not a documentary, but according to its author:

– Mark L. Chance.
True - but he also said “it’s a novel”. I think his intent is to sell books, not start a new religious movement.
 
I can’t believe the ruckus that Catholics are making over the Davinci Code. I read the book, and enjoyed it for what it was…a work of fiction. The only thing you are accomplishing with all of your “debunking” is keeping it in the limelight, and making more money for this author who you supposedly “despise”.
I personally think that these folks who are so adamantly opposed to the Davinci Code must have some kind of financial interest in the book sales, since they have worked so hard to keep it in the news.
I’ve got an idea…why don’t you picket outside the theatres too so that the box office can pull in an extra $10 million on opening weekend.
Demetrios has a point. The only bad publicity is no publicity.
Negative buzz is still buzz!
With all due respect, these comments are incredibly self-centered. I don’t give a rats you-know-what if people see the movie or read the book or not. The big concern is for people who will see the movie or have read the book and will have their faith damaged or go around damaging the faith of others by ignorantly spouting off this Da Vinci nonsense. The goal is not prevention, but damage control.

Perhaps some may live isolated, self-absorbed lives where they don’t see or care about the damage that has been done by the book, but I have talked to scores of people who have had their faith **seriously ** shaken by the allegations found there. What about them – or isn’t this important? :confused:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top