The didache, also called the teaching of the Apostles

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bill_Pick
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
B

Bill_Pick

Guest
How many have read the didache, and why do you think the didache not make it unto the Bible. A question we can have with out any arguing.
 
How many have read the didache, and why do you think the didache not make it unto the Bible. A question we can have with out any arguing.
I’ve read it. It’s not extant so I would guess that would be one of the reasons it wasn’t included into the canon. Right about the area where it starts to get interesting it cuts off.

Here’s a copy on line if anyone wants to check it out.

The final verses:
And then shall appear the signs of the truth; first, the sign of an out-spreading in heaven; then the sign of the sound of the trumpet; and the third, the resurrection of the dead; yet not of all, but as it is said: The Lord shall come and all His saints with Him. Then shall the world see the Lord coming upon the clouds of heaven …
 
The reason most commonly given was that while it was called the teaching of the Apostles, it didn’t claim authorship by a specific Apostle or an intimate of the Apostles such as Mark or Luke. It was however read in a number of early churches and put to good use.
 
The didache was a short summary of the teachings of Jesus, and the apostles, meant to be memorized. It was like the Creed. It was written before the Gospels. All that was contained within the Didache was written into the Gospels, therefore it was unnecessary to include it in the Bible.

scrollpublishing.com/store/Didache-text.html I don’t know if it is the best translation,but it is the first one I picked up.
 
How many have read the didache, and why do you think the didache not make it unto the Bible. A question we can have with out any arguing.
Bill,

Although I believe Athanasius, Didymus, and Eusebius among others referenced the work we did not have a copy until around 1873. Or at least a full version. The main reason it was not canonized was due to the inability to trace it to a specific Apostle.

PEACE
 
Bill,

Although I believe Athanasius, Didymus, and Eusebius among others referenced the work we did not have a copy until around 1873. Or at least a full version. The main reason it was not canonized was due to the inability to trace it to a specific Apostle.

PEACE
Thank you but was it not around in70ad or 100ad.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top