Welcome to the forum :tiphat:
I’ve heard the comment as well, that Luther didn’t want to start a new Church apart from the Catholic Church. Here’s why I don’t believe that.
- Excommunication isn’t meant to be permanent. The hope is that the one who is excommunicated will change and come back into communion. Luther was given multiple chances to change and he didn’t take any of them.
- He doubled down on his errors and refused correction. Here’s an example, 10 years after he was excommunicated, he said the following
- " I also know that in Rom. 3, the word “solum” is not present in either Greek or Latin text - the papists did not have to teach me that - it is fact! The letters s-o-l-a are not there."
- “if your Papist wishes to make a great fuss about the word “alone” (sola), say this to him: “Dr.Martin Luther will have it so and he says that a papist and an *** are the same thing.” Sic volo, sic iubeo, sit pro ratione voluntas. (I will it, I command it; my will is reason enough) For we are not going to become students and followers of the papists. Rather we will become their judge and master”.
- " However, I was not depending upon or following the nature of language when I inserted the word “solum” (alone) in Rom. 3 as the text itself, and St. Paul’s meaning, urgently necessitated and demanded it " iclnet.org/pub/resources/text/wittenberg/luther/luther-translate.txt
- This shows his disposition. There was no working with that guy
Re: “the saving work of Jesus on the cross”, doesn’t then translate into a person can then believe or reject what they want without consequences. That would be relativism.
That’s my :twocents:
Hi, Steve B!!!
Thank you for your comments!!!
You have several valid points and I appreciate your views!!
You are right when you say Martin Luther was excommunicated from the Catholic Church and in his case, it became permanent. He was excommunicated simply because he spoke truth to power. The Catholic Church did not like that!! Jesus was also excluded from the fellowship of the temple for the very same reasons as Martin Luther. They both were fed up with the corruption of the religious establishment of their day. Both Martin Luther and Jesus share many similarities. Both men attracted the common man, rather than the religious elites, and both men taught that God was a God of love and not someone who was waiting in the wings to damn people. Martin Luther did not repent because he was standing up to the corruption of the Church!! Martin Luther so loved the Catholic Church that he wanted the power brokers of the time to teach correct Catholic teaching, doctrine and tradition. Not the selling of indulgences, giving a certain amount of money so you can buy your way into heaven, God being a wrathful God, etc.
You are right, Steve B when you mention about Martin Luther putting in Sola Scriptura in the translation of the scriptures. But, and here is where I feel many Catholics are not aware of this, Sola Scriptura is not in the original manuscripts of the scriptures!! You will not find it anywhere in the Bible. It is good that you referenced Romans Chapter 3, because that gives a good illustration of Lutheran theology. I think it gives a good illustration of Catholic Theology too!! Works always accompany true saving faith. One cannot be saved by faith alone!! Works always accompany a true faith. Works are a natural byproduct of faith. Lutherans don’t believe in Sola Scriptura alone. We believe in Church tradition (both of the Catholic and Lutheran traditions) the witness, writings and the example of the saints and the example and holiness of the Mother of God. Who, incidentally, is our Mother too!! It is an interesting thing to note, that Martin Luther always taught, professed and confessed that Mary was immaculately conceived, was a virgin her whole life and was the Mother of God and consequently, our mother too!!
Yes, indeed I agree with you that a person believing what they want to believe without consequences is relativism. In fact, that is a grave error that has infested our society!! As far as Christs sacrifice on the cross is concerned, I believe that is a done deal. The seal of forgiveness has been placed on anyone willing to believe in the life, death, resurrection and the ascention Christ. That, for me, is first and foremost. The saving work of Christ on the cross is not a relative thing for me at all. It is fact. If a person does not believe this, I would not want to be in their shoes when they pass over the veil!! There will be definite consequences for people who reject Christ. And they will not be good ones!!
If you see this post, Steve B, let me know what your thoughts are on this!!
Thank you again for your (name removed by moderator)ut, Steve B!! I like discussing Christ and his Church!!!
Take care all and God Bless!!!



