F
FrDavid96
Guest
Please keep in mind that I’m trying to imagine some kind of scenario in which this might apply. My examples are not meant to be “realistic” but more “hypothetical” just to make the point that it might (stress might) be possible. I think it would be very easy for us to get caught up in discussing the details of such hypothetical scenarios that we get distracted from the real discussion.I don’t think confirming a wife’s suspicions would be an example of giving scandal. Even if it were, the husband would have to be truly repentant before he could receive communion. With a wife that would say that, he would probably feel justified rather than repentant.
In the seminary, we used to have what we called the “Gilligan’s Island” scenarios. These helped us to understand canon law. Thoughts like “how long do they have to be marrooned on the island before they could have a sacramental marriage without a priest?” simply allowed us to better understand the principle because we could see it more concretely. They weren’t “realistic” of course. That’s what I’m trying to provide here with a few examples. Not realism, but some imaganary scenarios to help understand the principle.
PS–the “scandal” part would come into play because it might lead the wife to sin, by her knowlege of the infidelity, and could cause harm to the children. Now, lest anyone think that I’m advocating marital infidelity by implying that the cheating husband should be “allowed” to keep his secret, please read the previous paragraph. It’s just an extreme hypothetical example. Let’s not make too much of these.