B
Brendan
Guest
It is, just sometimes, it is offered only in the form of bread.Yes thank you. The article seems to strengthen even more that the Precious Blood should be offered to the faithful.)
It is, just sometimes, it is offered only in the form of bread.Yes thank you. The article seems to strengthen even more that the Precious Blood should be offered to the faithful.)
I would suggest that by partaking in the Eucharistic you are in fact eating the flesh AND drinking the blood of our Load Jesus Christ…He not only lived for us but suffered and died on the cross for us so that we could receive him at Holy Mass.Makes sense but why then does Jesus refer so specifically and apparently emphatically to drinking His Blood in John 6:53-56?
Yes, Christ is fully present – not only his body, but also by concomitance, his blood – in the Eucharistic bread. That means that you are doing what He commands in John 6, every time you receive communion, even if you don’t receive from the chalice. But, when the chalice is offered to the congregation, the ‘sign value’ of the Eucharist is “more clearly evident”.Holy Communion has a fuller form as a sign when it takes place under both kinds. For in this form the sign of the Eucharistic banquet is more clearly evident and clearer expression is given
It has never been a problem in the Orthodox Church. Why would it be impractical in the Latin rite of the Catholic Church?It’s not always practical for the people to receive the blood also. eg. at a large church, in a hospital, for the homebound.
Sacrament is a grace. The answer to your question would be answered by the answer to this question: Do you receive any less grace by receiving only species or more grace by receiving both specie?Is there any greater “devotion” than “drinking” it as Jesus so strongly and repeatedly teaches us to do?
How many congregants would typically be receiving Eucharist at a Divine Liturgy? What’s the expectation for the length of the Liturgy? How many Divine Liturgies would be scheduled on a normal Sunday?It has never been a problem in the Orthodox Church. Why would it be impractical in the Latin rite of the Catholic Church?
Maybe you can’t compare because they are different churches.It has never been a problem in the Orthodox Church. Why would it be impractical in the Latin rite of the Catholic Church?
It depends on the feast day. During Pascha, over 1000.How many congregants would typically be receiving Eucharist at a Divine Liturgy?
Matins and Divine Liturgy usually lasts about 3 hoursWhat’s the expectation for the length of the Liturgy?
Church canons do not allow more than one Liturgy to be served on the same altar each day. Some churches have a smaller chapel on one side where a second Liturgy could be performed by another priest (the priest can only serve one Divine Liturgy per day also)How many Divine Liturgies would be scheduled on a normal Sunday?
The presanctified lamb also has the sign of the cross made on it with the sanctified blood before it is set aside. Both Body and Blood are always present in Orthodox Holy CommunionProdromos,
There is also the Liturgy of the Pre-Sanctified. That is the communication of the Holy Eucharist via the form of bread. The primary difference in the Roman Church is that it is not offered mixed with unconsecrated wine.
Unfortunately that is very true.Maybe you can’t compare because they are different churches.
Reverence is very high in the Orthodox Church. Holy Communion is the very focus of the Liturgy.In my cathedral we serve only the host. With a seating capacity of about 1800, it has never been brought up at all to serve the blood. Perhaps we are unique in the sense that reverence is very high on the list when giving and receiving Communion, the logistic of trying to give the blood would be unthinkable.
This makes no sense to me. We are receiving life itself. How can anyone imagine disease could be spread through the “spring of immortality” or through the hands or chalice which have been sanctified by the same?The thought of sharing the cup can be very repugnant to some people. During the SARS epidemic, we are not allow to shake hand in the church and receiving on the tongue was suspended due to health hazard.
Yes, the wine is blessed, but Anaphora is not said over the wine. Ergo, it remains wine.The presanctified lamb also has the sign of the cross made on it with the sanctified blood before it is set aside. Both Body and Blood are always present in Orthodox Holy Communion
Wine is added to the pre sanctified gifts, but as I stated before, the lamb is intincted with the precious blood on Sunday, before it is set aside for use in the pre sanctified liturgy during the weekdays of Lent.Yes, the wine is blessed, but Anaphora is not said over the wine. Ergo, it remains wine.
Now we’re getting somewhere!This makes no sense to me. We are receiving life itself. How can anyone imagine disease could be spread through the “spring of immortality” or through the hands or chalice which have been sanctified by the same?
I tended to take that approach initially but I guess those responsible were more pragmatic about it. Apparently they thought the life giving part is spiritual, and less of the physical.This makes no sense to me. We are receiving life itself. How can anyone imagine disease could be spread through the “spring of immortality” or through the hands or chalice which have been sanctified by the same?
In the Orthodox Church, the priest uses a small spoon to take a small amount of Christ’s Body and Blood from the chalice then puts the spoon into the communicant’s mouth, after which it goes back into the chalice for the next person. At the end of the Liturgy, the priest or deacon consumes whatever remains of the Holy Gifts. No priest or deacon has ever contracted disease from one of his flock through the Eucharist. I know of Orthodox who made a point of receiving Holy Communion after fellow parishioners who were suffering from AIDS had received. If any in our parish were suffering such illnesses, I would happily do the same.I tended to take that approach initially but I guess those responsible were more pragmatic about it. Apparently they thought the life giving part is spiritual, and less of the physical.
Likewise, the usage of the holy water font was suspended during the duration. Both actions were taken in cognizance of the Health Ministry advice.