The Eucharistic Miracle of Lanciano

  • Thread starter Thread starter Radical
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Linoli’s point here, as I get it, is that the originally the slice from what we can see now, must have been uniform. Now, the heart, as we know nowadays, is far from being a homogenous sphere. It is a peculiarly shaped hollow organ. You just can hardly expect to get nice uniform slices without expertise.
from my (limited) butchering experience, I found that a very sharp knife easily permits a nice clean uniform slice…whether it is an organ or muscle (cross cut or length wise).
Just look at a picture of a half-heart. And imagine having the fresh organ. We could ask butchers or cardiologists.
any sort of expert feed back on Linoli’s assertions is exactly what is missing
 
That builds on the key you proposed above, that fabricating miracles was a somehow encouraged practice.
I don’t know that I would say encouraged…but the possibility of income from pilgrimages might encourage a local Church to try to validate an alleged miracle.
Should we see the degree of preservation through centuries as God’s ratification of a deception ?
again, I am not convinced that the preservation is at all extraordinary.
Now we’d need climatologists. I remember the source you proposed would mention that natural mummifications appear to happen in very dry or very cold climates. That is definitely not the case in coastal central Italy.
please keep in mind that those were examples of the natural mummification of whole bodies…think of the amount of moisture contained in such bodies versus a thin slice of muscle. What is more incredible, the natural mummification of whole bodies in dry climates or the natiural mummification of a thin slice of muscle in a jar in Lanciano…I don’t have the expertise to answer…but I hardly see it as the latter being the obvious choice for being the more incredible.
 
I doubt that opening corpses was generally speaking a morally accepted activity in the Middle Ages, BTW.
agreed, but respect for corpses wasn’t such that it would prevent a Pope from putting the corpse of another Pope on trial… most certainly not the norm (for Popes or others), but we can see that violation of the dead was not unheard of…I expect that the average medieval Joe was much, much more familiar with handing corpses than we moderns.
 
Would you see outrage or beauty in the EMOL miracle, from S. Thomas’s point of view ?
From S. Thomas POV, one would see beauty, b/c one sees the miraculous…I just don’t see all that much beauty in S. Thomas’s explanation. 😉
 
I was also striken by a tale about an ( alleged ) Eucharistic miracle just in your own Province. 🙂
cool
A moving case of levitation of the consecrated Host in 1946. michaeljournal.org/cowley.htm Maybe you can easily discover it is a pure legend.
ironically, that area is thick with Mormons these days
Or maybe, one of Sergeant Parsons children or relatives is still there to tell you how the eye witness would describe his experience. ,
I would be fun to investigate (if I had the time)…it isn’t that far away, and I do have a niece in the area. Tell, you what. You drive to Lanciano and get them to do some further expert studies and I’ll go to South Western Ablberta and check out this miracle…
 
What I do not know is whether Charismatics scrutinize their (alleged) miracles as the Church does.
they don’t, apart from a few exceptions
The fact that in your case you decided to examine miracles reaching your radar screens on a case by case basis sounds very important . You do not seemingly share the classic post-Reformation approach on “no miracles after Revelation”.
I do not…IMHO, just as the Spirit blows where he will, so too, the Father works wonders where he will.
I also guess that your statement about RP not being supported by miracles ( besides failing scripturally, historically and theologically ) is qualified by an implicit “ as for what I could detect so far on the alleged miracles I could consider”.
agreed
Hoping something can help.
hearing from another intelligent and thoughtful Catholic is always a benefit
God bless you
and you too…greatly!
 
Sorry Radical, but you’ve lost all credibility with me in regards to you at all being objective…
I didn’t even know I had any…bummer.
Although I believe some Charismatic healings might be real, I can’t tell Christ what he is and isn’t allowed to do,…
I have never tried that either
… you are very ignorant of the strict standards the CC has, especially the Lourdes committe.
you are right…my ignorance is vast
Also as a personal consideration, you should be very careful when you go around accusing miracles who’s nature you are not aware of being lies, and fabrications. That’s dangerously close to Blasphemy of the Holy spirit.
ironically, this is exactly how those Charismatics (that you would hope to distance Catholic practice from) will respond when their alleged miracles (or odd behavior) is questioned.
 
ironically, this is exactly how those Charismatics (that you would hope to distance Catholic practice from) will respond when their alleged miracles (or odd behavior) is questioned.
You are wrong in assuming what I would hope for. I do not want to distance anyone from the Church, I want to bring them to the Church.

As for their practices. I believe God works miracles. If God has ever worked miracles in the Charismatic circles, so be it.

Really though, throughout this thread you have taken jabs at the Charismatic’s as if it is you who would like to distance yourself from them, but the truly ironic thing is that both you and the Charismatics are Sola Scriptura Protestants. You both believe the same things, except that the Charismatics believe it just a little extra…
 
You are wrong in assuming what I would hope for. I do not want to distance anyone from the Church, I want to bring them to the Church.

As for their practices. I believe God works miracles. If God has ever worked miracles in the Charismatic circles, so be it.

Really though, throughout this thread you have taken jabs at the Charismatic’s as if it is you who would like to distance yourself from them, but the truly ironic thing is that both you and the Charismatics are Sola Scriptura Protestants. You both believe the same things, except that the Charismatics believe it just a little extra…
Being a charismatic or a sola scriptura person has absolutely nothing to do with the category of Eucharistic miracles such as the one which occurred centuries ago in Lanciano, Italy. And any other kind of miracle which occurs to a charismatic or a sola scriptura person has absolutely nothing to do with the category of Eucharistic miracles such as the one which occurred centuries ago in Lanciano, Italy.
 
The fact that in your case you decided to examine miracles reaching your radar screens on a case by case basis sounds very important . You do not seemingly share the classic post-Reformation approach on “no miracles after Revelation”. But then, I could be overoptimist again here. 🙂
Pardon me. But I do not know the meaning of the classic post-Reformation approach on “no miracles after Revelation.” It does not sound like the Catholic position on Divine Revelation nor does it sound like the Catholic position on miracles. also known as extraordinary phenomena, which occur sometime after the era of the Apostolic Age. Thank you.
 
they don’t, apart from a few exceptions

I do not…IMHO, just as the Spirit blows where he will, so too, the Father works wonders where he will.

agreed

hearing from another intelligent and thoughtful Catholic is always a benefit

and you too…greatly!
Dear Radical,
Code:
            in my perception  we  reached/noted a  number of  signifant convergences.
0n the very topic of the thread it appears we both admit that EMOL and other alleged eucharistic miracles could be or not real miracles, just differing on the degree of confidence respectively assigned to the two alternatives.

Within this framework we also agree that further investigations would be in principle welcome. I am afraid I haven’t got much influence on … starting them :), which is, I’d say, a decision to be guided by prudence.

btw Have you performed that mental experiment, about you experiencing an eucharistic miracle, be it Lanciano-like or a levitation ?

I’ll keep reading your exchanges with Lyrical.
See you next time. Thanks.

God bless you.
 
Pardon me. But I do not know the meaning of the classic post-Reformation approach on “no miracles after Revelation.” It does not sound like the Catholic position on Divine Revelation nor does it sound like the Catholic position on miracles. also known as extraordinary phenomena, which occur sometime after the era of the Apostolic Age. Thank you.
Hi Grannymh.

Within XVI centuries Protestant discourses against the credibility of the Church, one was that she could not boast in principle any miracle, since miracles would be just a peculiar feature of the age of Revelation. We can imagine this was considered a powerful tool in order to help a new Protestant establishment to eradicate popular Catholicism.

(IMHO the proponents of this tenet would make the Early Church Fathers a bunch of deceivers or deceived).

In Christ

P7
 
Dear Radical,

in my perception we reached/noted a number of signifant convergences.

0n the very topic of the thread it appears we both admit that EMOL and other alleged eucharistic miracles could be or not real miracles, just differing on the degree of confidence respectively assigned to the two alternatives.

Within this framework we also agree that further investigations would be in principle welcome. I am afraid I haven’t got much influence on … starting them :), which is, I’d say, a decision to be guided by prudence.

btw Have you performed that mental experiment, about you experiencing an eucharistic miracle, be it Lanciano-like or a levitation ?

I’ll keep reading your exchanges with Lyrical.
See you next time. Thanks.

God bless you.
From studying the material accompanying the Vatican Exhibition of Eucharistic miracles, I doubt there would be further investigation because these miracles have been declared worthy of belief. Worthy of belief means that one can or not believe they happened. Worthy is used because at the time of the miracle, there were good effects in the spiritual life of the people living then and those living now who visit the Church where the miracle took place.

The exception would be the Eucharistic miracle at Siena because every so often, these Hosts are examined as to their freshness, etc. The relics of the miracle at Lanciano could also be examined as they have been following the natural process for flesh and blood. In addition, there could be other miracles similar to these which could be re-examined.

Personally, I have considered some of the Eucharistic miracles more on the unbelievable side. However, the presiding Bishop at that time decided that the witness accounts were valid and/or the particular Host was still present. Besides, who am I to doubt the power of the Real Presence of Christ?

Blessings,
granny

The greatest Miracle of all is the Catholic Eucharist.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top