The Evolution of the Bible

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ron_Conte
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
R

Ron_Conte

Guest
The Bible has not remained the same since the writing of each of the original manuscripts.

Some books might not have an original manuscript, since some books (e.g. Genesis) are the product of many years of editing: adding, subtracting, and changing material. By the time that the book reaches a version analogous to a ‘first edition,’ it may have existed in numerous copies that were not identical to one another.

In any case, the books of the Bible that we have today are not the same as the original manuscripts or the earliest sets of manuscripts of any book. Have they degraded as time passed? Must we recover the originals in order to save truth from extinction? Have the truths of Scripture been distorted and obscured with the passage of time? No, no, and no.

Instead, God’s Providence and Grace is with Sacred Scripture as it is passed from generation to generation, just as God guides the transmission of Tradition and the teachings of the Magisterium. Just as the truths of Tradition and the Magisterium become clearer as time passes, so also do the truths of Scripture become clearer – and they become more clearly expressed through the process of editing and translation and comparing different versions in different languages.

In fact, just as the understanding and clear expression of the truths of Tradition and Magisterium continually improves in a process analogous to evolution, so also does the understanding and clear expression of the truths of Scripture continually improve. The truths themselves do not change or evolve. It is their expression in human language which evolves as Scripture is transmitted from one version to another.

This process occurs in three ways:
  1. As the faithful, through the centuries, prayerfully read, understand, and live Scripture, the understanding of the text increases and results in translations and editions that more clearly express the truths of Scripture than prior editions and translations. Each successive version of Scripture is influenced by other versions, in the same and other languages. Later versions of Scripture more clearly express truths of Scripture, which may have been obscured in prior editions. These later versions have the advantage of being influenced by more versions of Scripture and by the continuing process of the entire Church on earth praying and living Scripture through the centuries.
As a result, the original manuscript of a book of the Bible would not be better than having numerous version of that book, in numerous languages: versions that have gone through the long process of being influenced by the Scriptural life of the Church, so that the truths of the original manuscripts are more clearly expressed.
  1. In any particular language, even in the language in which the book was originally written (a matter of some dispute, in my view), as the text is copied again and again, the copyists sometimes functioned like an editor, not merely a copyist. Sometimes they may have done this deliberately, making a change to the wording of the text to make the meaning clearer. They had to do this because they generally worked from only one (maybe two?) copies in order to make their copy. And old manuscripts of the Bible have frequent copyist errors. So a copyist would intelligently decide if a spelling or wording was the error of a previous copyist and correct that error. Sometimes the correction resulted in a phrasing of a truth which expressed that truth more clearly than the original phrasing. Sometimes a copyist/editor would be correcting a real copyist error. Sometimes the assumed error was not a copyist error, but an awkward phrasing that could be improved. Over centuries of such corrections, and, in later years, similar types of corrections made by editors for printed versions, the truths of Scripture, by Providence and Grace, have become more clearly expressed in their various languages.
  2. Some improvements to the wording and phrasing of the truths of Scripture may have been non-deliberate random errors, a few of which happen to improve the text and so were more likely to be maintained in subsequent editions. This third way that the expression of the truths of Scripture has changed is analogous to evolution.
In the theory of evolution, random changes or mistakes in the genetic code occasionally result in improvements. These improvements are more likely to continue to subsequent generations. These improvements build up to result in a significantly better and different organism.

Similarly, the words and phrases used to express the truths of Scripture have been subject to many generations of copyist ‘typographical’ errors. Letters are dropped or added, accidentally. One word is substituted for a similar word because the text was misread. The order or words might be changed accidentally by the copyist. Such errors are more likely to occur if the result is a phrasing that more clearly expresses the truths of Scripture than the original text. And they are more likely to be adopted by subsequent copyists/editors. Most such errors are not improvements and are corrected in subsequent copies. But some small percentage of these ‘errors’ accidentally result in a better expression of truth. So God’s Providence and Grace guides the expression of the unchanging truths of Scripture into greater clarity.

In summary:

The truths of Scripture do not evolve, they are unchanging.

The expression of the truths of Scripture in human language is what evolves and changes, under God’s Providence and Grace. Such is also the case with Tradition and Magisterium.

The later versions of the Bible, especially taken as a set (not so much in individual versions by themsleves), contain a clearer and more comprehensive expression of the truths of Scripture than the original manuscripts did.

The truths of Sacred Scripture are not completely located in any one version or edition of the Bible. They are mostly located in any one version. But, in their entirety, they are located across all the versions and editions of the Bible that exist in their various languages.
 
I agree with you that the truths of scripture are unchanging, but disagree with you re: the evolution of the Bible or scripture. Actually, the consistency among the handwritten Torahs and Hebrew and NT scriptures created in different cultures and separated by thousands of years is absolutely remarkable with those inconsistencies being limited to issues of no material relevance on issues of salvation or theology.

In fact - I think the explanation for such consistency is nothing short of divine.

Blessings,

Brian
 
Ron

Thank you for your detailed discusion of the development of changes in the Bible.

I would slightly and respectfully disagee with you.

The Bible has changed very little over the years.

The version of Isaiah in the Dead See Scrolls differs little from later manuscripts, showing the stability of texts.

Similar results occur in the NT.

Some texts can be dated to very soon after the original versions were written.

P52 (Rylands) contains parts of John’s gospel written in about 125 AD, perhaps about 25 years after the Gospel was originally written.

Here in Dublin (Chester Beatty Library) we have manuscripts going back to 200-250 AD of the Gospels and the Letters of Paul etc. These were written fairly soon after the original texts.

These very early texts correspond very closely to those used now.
 
There are tens of thousands of textual variations.
The oldest manuscripts are many generations of copies away from the originals.
We are unable to reconstruct the original manuscripts.
God does protect the transmission of Scripture so that no truths are lost,
but He does not protect ‘only these letters in only this order in only this language’.
We are not even certain in which language certain books were written.
The text does improve over time.
Truths that were obscure in the original manuscripts are made clearer over time by copyist errors and corrections/improvements, editing, etc.
 
**There are tens of thousands of textual variations.**The oldest manuscripts are many generations of copies away from the originals.
We are unable to reconstruct the original manuscripts.
God does protect the transmission of Scripture so that no truths are lost,
but He does not protect ‘only these letters in only this order in only this language’.
We are not even certain in which language certain books were written.
The text does improve over time.
Truths that were obscure in the original manuscripts are made clearer over time by copyist errors and corrections/improvements, editing, etc.
As the other posters have said evidence contradicts your view. What evidence do you have to support your claim or are you just making assumptions?
 
Did I say tens of thousands? I was making an understatement.
It is common knowledge that there are a vast number of textual variations.

This author estimates that just the NT variants number in the hundreds of thousands:
The goal of New Testament textual criticism would appear to be simple enough: to restore the original text written by each author of the New Testament books. Upon examination, however, the notion of simplicity vanishes immediately and each of the key terms here—“restore,” “original,” “text,” and “author”—has its problematic aspects, but more importantly the simply stated goal itself turns out to be inadequate. Grist for the text-critical mill consists of textual readings or variants, which for the relatively small collection of writings called the New Testament are not merely in the hundreds or thousands, or even the tens of thousands, but run to perhaps a third of a million. They stem from the nearly 5,500 Greek manuscripts, some 10,000 versional manuscripts, and innumerable patristic citations of New Testament passages.
journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=1224088
See also this article:
newadvent.org/cathen/05286a.htm
 
Ron, in general, I agree with you.

But I have my doubts that the New World Translation (the Jehovah’s Witnesses Bible) was done under the protection of God… What say you?

Ruthie
 
But I have my doubts that the New World Translation (the Jehovah’s Witnesses Bible) was done under the protection of God… What say you?
That is not the topic that we are discussing.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top