M
mtoddm
Guest
I’ve been listening to a lecture series (Peter Kreeft’s) on St. Thomas Aquinas’ Summa Theologiae, good stuff!
One of his philosophical deductions is the existence of God of course, but then from that he deduces the existence of Angels – since from observed Nature, there is a gradation of created things from inanimate objects, up through simple plants, simple animals, all the way up to the more complex and intelligent animals, and then finally to Man – he considers it reasonable to assume that the spirit world is the same, and that God is at the highest and has no peer, and that there must be a gradation and levels of spiritual beings between Man and God, and that there is no uniformity and homogeneity when it comes to spirit beings–
This is intriguing to me, as while providing justification (independent of Scripture) for the belief in high spirit beings such as what we traditionally call Angels and Archangels, this also seems to give some possibility of “lower” simpler spirit beings, further down the strata and closer to Men, but still advanced by virtue of their nature, as Men surpass Apes –
I guess what I’m thinking is that since all indigenous cultures the world over have ever had some sort of belief in various types of spirit beings, semi-substantial and interacting with the physical world though not entirely of it, such as found in myths and legends of elves, gnomes, faeries, leprechauns, pwca, Sidhe, undines, sylphs, nereids, nymphs etc., (and I suppose ghosts and other phantoms fit in there somewhere), maybe there is some small kernel of truth in there, and these are those “lower” angels – more attached to earth than heaven, in varying degrees, perhaps given purview over certain aspects of Nature, trees, plants, animals, rivers, oceans, mountains etc., similar to how each one of us has an guardian angel -
Tolkien once wrote that since the love between the Father and the Son is not just abstract Love, but becomes manifest in another Person, the Holy Spirit, God’s individual love for each of us becomes personified in our guardian angel – perhaps the same is true with each of his created things, not just people
I was reading on it and cultures far removed from each other have strikingly similar beliefs and mythologies which include such creatures - Australian natives, African tribes, Native Americans, Eskimos, Asians, Greeks, etc. and of course Europe, the Celtic lands etc. it appears to be a universal element in all folk traditions -
However when I delve too deeply into the literature, it swiftly becomes too “New Age” sounding, and drifts into Theosophism, witchcraft etc… so maybe it’s more of a demon connection, than an angel connection, or both…?
Any thoughts or insights?
—todd
catholicsojourner.blogspot.com
One of his philosophical deductions is the existence of God of course, but then from that he deduces the existence of Angels – since from observed Nature, there is a gradation of created things from inanimate objects, up through simple plants, simple animals, all the way up to the more complex and intelligent animals, and then finally to Man – he considers it reasonable to assume that the spirit world is the same, and that God is at the highest and has no peer, and that there must be a gradation and levels of spiritual beings between Man and God, and that there is no uniformity and homogeneity when it comes to spirit beings–
This is intriguing to me, as while providing justification (independent of Scripture) for the belief in high spirit beings such as what we traditionally call Angels and Archangels, this also seems to give some possibility of “lower” simpler spirit beings, further down the strata and closer to Men, but still advanced by virtue of their nature, as Men surpass Apes –
I guess what I’m thinking is that since all indigenous cultures the world over have ever had some sort of belief in various types of spirit beings, semi-substantial and interacting with the physical world though not entirely of it, such as found in myths and legends of elves, gnomes, faeries, leprechauns, pwca, Sidhe, undines, sylphs, nereids, nymphs etc., (and I suppose ghosts and other phantoms fit in there somewhere), maybe there is some small kernel of truth in there, and these are those “lower” angels – more attached to earth than heaven, in varying degrees, perhaps given purview over certain aspects of Nature, trees, plants, animals, rivers, oceans, mountains etc., similar to how each one of us has an guardian angel -
Tolkien once wrote that since the love between the Father and the Son is not just abstract Love, but becomes manifest in another Person, the Holy Spirit, God’s individual love for each of us becomes personified in our guardian angel – perhaps the same is true with each of his created things, not just people
I was reading on it and cultures far removed from each other have strikingly similar beliefs and mythologies which include such creatures - Australian natives, African tribes, Native Americans, Eskimos, Asians, Greeks, etc. and of course Europe, the Celtic lands etc. it appears to be a universal element in all folk traditions -
However when I delve too deeply into the literature, it swiftly becomes too “New Age” sounding, and drifts into Theosophism, witchcraft etc… so maybe it’s more of a demon connection, than an angel connection, or both…?
Any thoughts or insights?
—todd
catholicsojourner.blogspot.com