The Fall According to Mormonism

  • Thread starter Thread starter Chris-WA
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
:confused:

So you believe Satan does God’s work?
I think Satan is short sighted. He is an enemy to God and 24-7 is tryign to mess stuff up, but God is (thankfully) a whole lot smarter. God’s ability to understand things allows him to out smart him.
 
I think Satan is short sighted. He is an enemy to God and 24-7 is tryign to mess stuff up, but God is (thankfully) a whole lot smarter. God’s ability to understand things allows him to out smart him.
Oh my. If the fall was God’s plan, then why did Christ suffer, die and rise again in order to atone for His own plan?
 
I think Satan is short sighted. He is an enemy to God and 24-7 is tryign to mess stuff up, but God is (thankfully) a whole lot smarter. God’s ability to understand things allows him to out smart him.
Also, this is the same sort of “reasoning” you have in re: to polygamy as well. That is, God allowed it. So is polygamy also like the fall, that is, Satan’s desire that God allows polygamy because he has a “plan”?

How many other evils do Mormons believe their god allows along the lines of the ends justify the means?

“One may never do evil so that good may result from it;” Catechism of the Catholic Church
 
You still haven’t answered my question: Why did God put the tree of knowledge of good and evil in the Garden in the first place?
As a test for Adam and Eve. The tree of knowledge itself was not a bad thing. God doesn’t create anything bad. What was bad was Adam and Eve freely choosing to disobey God’s commandment to not eat its fruit. He gave them a list of “do’s” and one big “don’t.” They chose to disregard the “don’t.”
And what is wrong with knowing good and evil anyway?
Nothing. But Adam and Eve were told not to eat that fruit, and they chose to disobey. It was their disobedience that was bad, not the fact that they gained knowledge.
I should have thought that any kind of knowledge would be a desirable thing; but especially knowledge of good and evil.
Again, that’s not a bad thing. The bad thing was the disobedience. Why God didn’t want them to eat that particular fruit is His business. I don’t question why.
Would you like to be deprived of your knowledge of good and evil? Bear in mind that if you didn’t know the difference between good and evil, you couldn’t do any good—or evil! So what is the deal?
I certainly think Adam and Eve knew the difference between obeying God and not obeying God before they ate the fruit, otherwise God’s threat of death would have had no meaning. It would have been meaningless to them. In some way Adam had to have known that eating the fruit would lead to very unpleasant consequences. The whole story makes no sense otherwise.

Look, this is really a very simple concept, but you’re unnecessarily complicating the whole thing. God gave a direct commandment to Adam not to eat the fruit from the tree of knowledge. Adam and Eve freely chose to break the commandment. They suffered the consquences, the worst of which was spiritual death. Only with the suffering, death, and resurrection of Christ has this been rectified. It’s really that simple. It has nothing to do with knowledge being good or bad in and of itself. Knowledge itself is a neutral thing. It can be used for good or bad.
 
As a test for Adam and Eve. The tree of knowledge itself was not a bad thing. God doesn’t create anything bad. What was bad was Adam and Eve freely choosing to disobey God’s commandment to not eat its fruit. He gave them a list of “do’s” and one big “don’t.” They chose to disregard the “don’t.”
That is a ridiculous argument to bring. First of all, why should He want to “test” them at all—knowing that they would fail and end up dying? Why not let them live happily in the Garden forever? Second, what kind of test is that, giving them something that is essentially desirable, but telling them not to partake of it? That is like cheating and being dishonest. Would you “test” you son by saying to him: “Here is a good book. It is called the Bible. It is the best book you will ever read. I am going to put a copy of it in your own bedroom, on your bookshelf. But I don’t want you to read it, because the minute you read of it, I am going to expel you from my house, and you will no longer be called my son.” Would you “test” your son that way? Why should any honest, decent person waht to?
Look, this is really a very simple concept, but you’re unnecessarily complicating the whole thing.
I think you are unnecessarily simplifying the whole thing. There is clearly more to it than that. The whole of God’s dealings with mankind throughout history can be summarized in one sentence: choose to do good, and eschew evil. That is what God has commanded mankind to do—with a day of judgment set aside in which all mankind will be judged according to their works:

John 5:

28 Marvel not at this: for the hour is coming, in the which all that are in the graves shall hear his voice,

29 And shall come forth; they that have done good, unto the resurrection of life; and they that have done evil, unto the resurrection of damnation.

Revelation 20:

12 And I saw the dead, small and great, stand before God; and the books were opened: and another book was opened, which is the book of life: and the dead were judged out of those things which were written in the books, according to their works.

13 And the sea gave up the dead which were in it; and death and hell delivered up the dead which were in them: and they were judged every man according to their works.

If Adam and Eve had not partaken of the forbidden fruit, none of this would have been possible. Nobody would have known good and evil to be able to do either, and the satisfaction of going to heaven for having done good, or the dissatisfaction of going to hell for having done evil—“having no joy, for they knew no misery; doing no good, for they knew no sin” (2 Nephi 2:23). The whole of God purpose for man on earth would have been frustrated. But “all things have been done in the wisdom of him who knoweth all things” (2 Nephi 2:24).

zerinus
 
That is a ridiculous argument to bring. First of all, why should He want to “test” them at all—knowing that they would fail and end up dying? Why not let them live happily in the Garden forever? yuet that is exactly what mormons believe happened. and why “test” us at all? knowing that all will sin and fall short of the glory of God?
zerinus;3773172:
Second, what kind of test is that, giving them something that is essentially desirable, but telling them not to partake of it? That is like cheating and being dishonest. Would you “test” you son by saying to him: “Here is a good book. It is called the Bible. It is the best book you will ever read. I am going to put a copy of it in your own bedroom, on your bookshelf. But I don’t want you to read it, because the minute you read of it, I am going to expel you from my house, and you will no longer be called my son.” Would you “test” your son that way? Why should any honest, decent person waht to?
you start with the false assumption that the forbidden fruit was good. this is only a mormon belief. the tree of life was presented to Adam and Eve as the “good fruit”, teh “best fruit yo will ever eat”.
I think you are unnecessarily simplifying the whole thing. There is clearly more to it than that. The whole of God’s dealings with mankind throughout history can be summarized in one sentence: choose to do good, and eschew evil. That is what God has commanded mankind to do—with a day of judgment set aside in which all mankind will be judged according to their works:

John 5:

28 Marvel not at this: for the hour is coming, in the which all that are in the graves shall hear his voice,

29 And shall come forth; they that have done good, unto the resurrection of life; and they that have done evil, unto the resurrection of damnation.

Revelation 20:

12 And I saw the dead, small and great, stand before God; and the books were opened: and another book was opened, which is the book of life: and the dead were judged out of those things which were written in the books, according to their works.

13 And the sea gave up the dead which were in it; and death and hell delivered up the dead which were in them: and they were judged every man according to their works.

If Adam and Eve had not partaken of the forbidden fruit, none of this would have been possible. Nobody would have known good and evil to be able to do either, and the satisfaction of going to heaven for having done good, or the dissatisfaction of going to hell for having done evil—“having no joy, for they knew no misery; doing no good, for they knew no sin” (2 Nephi 2:23). The whole of God purpose for man on earth would have been frustrated. But “all things have been done in the wisdom of him who knoweth all things” (2 Nephi 2:24).

zerinus
more mormon misinterpret ion of scripture mingled with JS own invented writings that try to foist off the belief that sin can be good. only satan taught these concepts. the fall wasn’t necessary. adam knew good from evil. he chose not to eat the fruit originally because he knew it was wrong. eve knew too but fell for satan’s line that they could be gods. they had plenty of joy in the garden.

it’s not a competition either where those in heaven rejoice at their own accomplishment. it is a GIFT for which we will thank a merciful God. He SAVES us. only those who reject his salvation will have to suffer for their sins. those who who repent and do his will as fruits of their repentance will be saved by God and NOT their own efforts.
 
Interesting, is it possible that God allows evil that good may come from it, I wonder.

Paul
No. That is not the assertion being made by your fellow Mormons. They are saying that God indirectly caused evil, as part of some sadistic plan involving double binds and God in collaboration with Satan.

No.
 
That is a ridiculous argument to bring. First of all, why should He want to “test” them at all—knowing that they would fail and end up dying? Why not let them live happily in the Garden forever? Second, what kind of test is that, giving them something that is essentially desirable, but telling them not to partake of it? That is like cheating and being dishonest. Would you “test” you son by saying to him: “Here is a good book. It is called the Bible. It is the best book you will ever read. I am going to put a copy of it in your own bedroom, on your bookshelf. But I don’t want you to read it, because the minute you read of it, I am going to expel you from my house, and you will no longer be called my son.” Would you “test” your son that way? Why should any honest, decent person waht to?
"

zerinus
But isn’t “testing” the whole idea in LDS theology? After all we all lived with the Heavenly Father(and presumptively our Heavenly Mother) prior to our earthly existence and were sent to this life to be tested. Why not let them simply continue to live as spirits with the Heavenly Father without all the “testing” that mortal life brings?? Your version is just as much questionable “testing” as the non LDS version yours just pushes the decision to “test” back into the pre-mortal life and lays the decision on the “council of gods”.
Second, what kind of test is that, giving them something that is essentially desirable, but telling them not to partake of it?
"

zerinus
Same kind as telling someone do this (be fruitful and multiply) when they can’t unless they disobey a don’t do (eat from the tree).

Just part of a history of LDS “the ends justify the means” theology.
 
No. That is not the assertion being made by your fellow Mormons. They are saying that God indirectly caused evil, as part of some sadistic plan involving double binds and God in collaboration with Satan.

No.
I think that it has to do with the plan of salvation. We are on this earth to be tested and to learn. There is no free road to heaven. We have choices between good and evil and we can freely chose between the two.

The mormon plan of salvation does make sense as does their pre-existence. Adam and Eve fulfilled god’s plan and satan blundered big time. Or did he? In the garden all was good. No evil until the disobeying of god’s word. For satan, I believe that it was better to tempt Adam and eve and start the ball rolling. From that time, he has been very busy with his demons. And we see the result all around us. The Screwtape Letters by CS Lewis is a great book of fiction that demontrates the point.
 
But isn’t “testing” the whole idea in LDS theology? After all we all lived with the Heavenly Father(and presumptively our Heavenly Mother) prior to our earthly existence and were sent to this life to be tested. Why not let them simply continue to live as spirits with the Heavenly Father without all the “testing” that mortal life brings??
Simple. Because in mormon theology we needed to obtain a physical body to become more like our father in heaven. And for satan who has never had a physical body to call his own, his jealousy is immense. Hence Mormons are cauttioned not to abuse their bodies as satan would wish them to. The body is a ‘spiritual temple’.
 
I think that it has to do with the plan of salvation. We are on this earth to be tested and to learn. There is no free road to heaven. We have choices between good and evil and we can freely chose between the two.

The mormon plan of salvation does make sense as does their pre-existence. Adam and Eve fulfilled god’s plan and satan blundered big time. Or did he? In the garden all was good. No evil until the disobeying of god’s word. For satan, I believe that it was better to tempt Adam and eve and start the ball rolling. From that time, he has been very busy with his demons. And we see the result all around us. The Screwtape Letters by CS Lewis is a great book of fiction that demontrates the point.
Until the fall there was no need for a plan of salvation. If Adam and Eve had obeyed God and not eaten the fruit God forbidden them to eat we have to assume that all of mankind would be living in the world today with no evil and that the world world would be as the garden, Or that at some other time by some other person Satan would have been able to to sin and at that time caused the fall. To believe that the fall had to happen is wrong in do think that it was going to happen at some point regardless because of free will, but that it is not Gods plan for it to happen.
 
… To believe that the fall had to happen is wrong in do think that it was going to happen at some point regardless because of free will, but that it is not Gods plan for it to happen.
And that’s why I ask if it’s right that God demand our obedience. If A&E had stayed in the garden, He would have our obedience but we would not have been able to exercise our free will and know the difference of good and evil. So what’s more important to a loving father, that his kids grow up and develop to be everything they can be, or to keep them subservient?
 
No. That is not the assertion being made by your fellow Mormons. They are saying that God indirectly caused evil, as part of some sadistic plan involving double binds and God in collaboration with Satan.

No.
I can’t agree with this notion as you have presented it, my fellow Mormons can thrash that out with you. What I see is that God allows evil, he does not condone it, encourage it, sanction it, but allows events to play out. I think there are examples that God uses the consequences resulting from evil to further his will.

Paul
 
And that’s why I ask if it’s right that God demand our obedience. If A&E had stayed in the garden, He would have our obedience but we would not have been able to exercise our free will and know the difference of good and evil. So what’s more important to a loving father, that his kids grow up and develop to be everything they can be, or to keep them subservient?
Choosing to exercise your free will to disobey is not what God ask God ask the we exercise it in obedience. Yes it is right for God to Demand our obedience. We would still have our free will if Adam and Eve had not disobeyed the Knowledge of Evil is not needed to be all we can be for it is evil that keeps us from becoming all that we are capable of being. I look over human history and see all that would not be ( that need not have been) if only we could have obeyed. I can only imagine the sadness that it brings to God for it saddens me so. If we look at History It has alway been God that has found ways for us to come back to him from our sin and always been man finding new ways to exercise his free will to turn from God. If not for the fall we would have walked with God in our mist just as in the garden. He did not will the fall to bring about salvation the fall brought on the need for salvation. Mormons are looking at this wrong.
 
adam and eve could have obeyed God and still had children. those children could have exercised free will just as easily and each one cold choose whether or not to eat the forbidden fruit. only mormonism requires this “necessry evil” as well as the requirement for a physical body.
 
I can’t agree with this notion as you have presented it, my fellow Mormons can thrash that out with you. What I see is that God allows evil, he does not condone it, encourage it, sanction it, but allows events to play out. I think there are examples that God uses the consequences resulting from evil to further his will.

Paul
What you are presenting is that God was indirectly involved in a mortal sin. God gave us free will, He did not create sin and does not act in a manner that encourages us to sin.

God does not use evil to further His Will. He may do things that counter evil, and to you that appears as using that evil, but it is not. God is not dependent upon evil in order so show us His Goodness and Mercy. To believe so is to believe that Satan has control over God.
 
That is a ridiculous argument to bring. First of all, why should He want to “test” them at all—knowing that they would fail and end up dying? Why not let them live happily in the Garden forever? Second, what kind of test is that, giving them something that is essentially desirable, but telling them not to partake of it? That is like cheating and being dishonest. Would you “test” you son by saying to him: “Here is a good book. It is called the Bible. It is the best book you will ever read. I am going to put a copy of it in your own bedroom, on your bookshelf. But I don’t want you to read it, because the minute you read of it, I am going to expel you from my house, and you will no longer be called my son.” Would you “test” your son that way? Why should any honest, decent person waht to?
Wow. You really have gone off the deep end. Did you read what you wrote before you posted it? Not even your fellow Mormons will agree with what you just said. Maybe you should break away from Mormonism and start your own religion, because that’s what you just did. God tests us all the time, does He not? The first test was a test of obedience for Adam and Eve. He created something desirable and told them to leave it alone. That was a test, and if you can’t see that, I don’t know how to help you. God has to test us like that. Without the possibility of choosing evil, free will doesn’t exist. It’s by choosing good over evil that we grow. Is that not MORMON TEACHING as well???
If Adam and Eve had not partaken of the forbidden fruit, none of this would have been possible. Nobody would have known good and evil to be able to do either, and the satisfaction of going to heaven for having done good, or the dissatisfaction of going to hell for having done evil—“having no joy, for they knew no misery; doing no good, for they knew no sin” (2 Nephi 2:23). The whole of God purpose for man on earth would have been frustrated. But “all things have been done in the wisdom of him who knoweth all things” (2 Nephi 2:24).
Ouch. Are you really suggesting that God told Adam not to do something, but secretly really wanted him to do it in order that His plan might be fulfilled? If that’s what you think, then the god you worship is most certainly not the eternal God of the universe, but is something much less. You need to do some serious soul searching on this one, my friend.
 
Because it was a part of the plan.
Let see here is what you call his plan. Create man without sin, have them fall into sin, so I can send a savior to save them from sin. Think real hard about that. It makes no since at all.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top