A
adgloriam
Guest
I’ve come across some religions that claim the captious sophism that they: “CAN be a religion and CAN be a philosophy.” (Whilst not necessarily being either.)
I read a text by one Cardinal that aptly refuted this sophism simply stating:“They are religions because they have metaphysical subjects.” (and not a word more.)
This sophism allows separating families because an average person can’t define the difference between philosophy and religion and so is left without any arguments. It also makes a person being seduced by a sect to isolate themselves socially because none of their friends will be able to make an argument against that sophism.
Please, thoughts and apologetic against that sophism any one?
I read a text by one Cardinal that aptly refuted this sophism simply stating:“They are religions because they have metaphysical subjects.” (and not a word more.)
This sophism allows separating families because an average person can’t define the difference between philosophy and religion and so is left without any arguments. It also makes a person being seduced by a sect to isolate themselves socially because none of their friends will be able to make an argument against that sophism.
Please, thoughts and apologetic against that sophism any one?
Last edited: