The First and Second Beast

  • Thread starter Thread starter StashLazarus
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
S

StashLazarus

Guest
Most end-time prophecy is viewed as foretelling the events of “Armageddon”, but Jesus said of the fig tree, “When the branch thereof is now tender, and the leaves come forth, you know that summer is nigh.” So the prophecies given by Christ provided us with signs to let us know that something is coming but they were not necessarily a description of what is coming. It is possible that other end-time prophecies are not about Armageddon, but are to be fulfilled before Armageddon to let us know that Armageddon is coming.

The word “Armageddon” is being used synonymous with “end-times” or “tribulation” as meaning the time of the end. The word “antichrist” is only used in the Bible to describe false religion, but it is commonly used to refer to an evil political leader. It should be understood that these are two different things, and the word “antichrist” is being used here to refer to the political leader, not the false religion.

There are a number of prophecies that talk of a political leader who immerges in the end times and it is assumed that many of these prophecies are talking about one person who is commonly referred to as the “antichrist”. It is this political leader called the antichrist who is believed to cause the events of Armageddon to occur. However, the prophecies never actually say that all of the various passages are talking about the same person. The different prophecies could be describing several different leaders over a period of time before the end, and those who fulfill the prophecies might not be evil, but their fulfillment of prophecy before the end is merely giving us a sign to let us know that the end is coming.

Not to be redundant but it is important to understand that this is not about politics. This is a different view of prophecy that cannot be discussed without the mentioning of political names, but it is not intended to criticize or take sides in any political issue. This is not saying that Reagan was the antichrist; this is saying that there is no political antichrist. This is not saying that Reagan was evil; this is saying that Reagan’s fulfillment of prophecy is merely a ‘sign’ that tells us that Christ will return…perhaps in the not to distant future.

It is only in modern times that people commonly have three names…first, last and middle. For most of the past two thousand years the only way to derive 666 from a person’s name was to use numerology, so numerology became thoroughly ingrained in Christian thought as the way to find the number of the beast. There are different methods of numerology, and there is also a tendency for people to take liberties when trying to find 666. With Nero it is necessary to add his title to his name, but with other leaders 666 can be found if you make some other adjustment to their name. With all of the adjustments and different versions of numerology, there have been many leaders over the past two thousand years who have been identified as the antichrist. Actually the prophecy says “count” the number, and numerology involves addition but not the more simple process of counting. Now that people have three names it becomes possible to find 666 in a person’s name simply by counting. Ronald Reagan was the first, and so far only, person to lead the world’s most powerful nation who had three names with six characters in each name.

One of the heads of the beast will seem to die from a head wound; but he will survive. James Brady, who was Reagan’s press secretary, survived a bullet through the brain. By saying, “one of the heads”, this suggests that it is not the leader himself, but one of his top officials who survives after seeming to be dead. When James Brady was shot it was widely reported by the media that he was dead, but some time later it was learned that he had miraculously survived.

Reagan seemed to slip in and out of senility during the election campaign of 1984, although he did pull off a great performance in the third and final debate which led to his landslide victory. Reagan’s off again…on again senility is called Alzheimer’s and it means that Reagan had three and a half years to continue with his agenda before he was greatly diminished as a leader by this disease. With Alzheimer’s, Reagan still had some good days, but he had too many bad days to be able to complete the down-sizing of government that he genuinely believed in. The beast is not said to rule for three and a half years; the prophecy says that power is given to him to continue for three and a half years.

Reagan literally led into captivity, perhaps with Iran-Contra, but certainly with his policy towards Iran which encouraged hostage taking in Beirut. Reagan was led into captivity as Alzheimer’s has been compared to being in a dark dungeon. “He that shall lead into captivity, shall go into captivity.” This is yet another fit to the book of Revelation. Reagan fits the prophecy of the first beast of Revelation literally on several points. No person, kingdom or empire has ever even come close to fulfilling all of these descriptions of the first beast with any real clarity.

Reagan left office, which naturally proved to everyone that he was not the antichrist, but the coming of a political leader called the antichrist is only an interpretation of the prophecies no matter how universally accepted it is. It is only an interpretation or an assumption that one person must fulfill everything and it must be fulfilled during the end-times and not before. Even if Reagan was a decent man and even if Reagan did not fulfill all the various prophecies that are attributed to the alleged “antichrist”, this does not change the fact that Reagan fits the description of the first beast of Revelation in remarkable detail.
 
Another contender for the antichrist was George W. Bush. Like Reagan before him, Bush was not consistent with all of the prophecies of the antichrist, but while Reagan was consistent with the first beast of Revelation, Bush was consistent with the second beast of Revelation. The second beast has two horns, and there are two presidents with the same name. Actually, their full names are not the same and this is why the son is not called George Bush Junior. Their names are George H. W. Bush and George W. Bush, but the name both men used in public was George Bush. It caused a little confusion at times since both men became well known by the same name. According to Revelation, the second beast was, is not, and yet at the same time is. When the second George Bush was president and the first George Bush was a former president, it could be said that George Bush was, is not, and yet at the same time is.

Before Bush it was hard to imagine how this prophecy could be fulfilled by a person, leading many to claim that it is describing a nation even though the second beast is clearly spoken of as a person. This is a person who existed, went away, and came back as a different person. Some have said it is talking about reincarnation, but reincarnation means this description of the beast wouldn’t be much of a clue. It would be impossible to prove or disprove that someone is the reincarnation of someone else, so why would such a clue even be mentioned?

The second beast is called a false prophet, yet he is said to have the same authority as the first beast who was a political leader. George Bush had the same authority as Reagan. As far as being a false prophet, some modern-day evangelicals make the claim that God “talks” to them on a regular basis. This does not mean that they are hearing voices, but that they attribute any sudden inspiration to God even if concerns a trivial matter. George W. Bush was one of those Christians and he would sometimes speak as if he was on a mission from God. It doesn’t matter how common this behavior is, or how many Christians claim that God speaks to them…by claiming that God speaks to them they are technically claiming to be prophets. If God does not give them daily instructions like they claim then they are false prophets. This is not to condemn George Bush or any other evangelical. Even if they are wrong in this belief, it is certainly true that nobody is perfect and God is rich in mercy. This is only to say that Bush fulfilled prophecy. With George Bush we had a president who was, is not, and yet is; and he was technically a false prophet who had the same authority as a former president who fulfilled the prophecies of the first beast.

The second beast is like a lamb but speaks like a dragon. No American president has been so open in proclaiming his Christianity, yet no American president has ever used such crude language.

In one passage in Revelation something called a “bottomless pit” is the source of great smoke. The passage seems to be describing an event which occurred in Iraq where petroleum was the source of great smoke. Since the second beast is said to ascend out of the “bottomless pit” and the “bottomless pit” on at least one occasion was referring to petroleum, this could mean that the second beast comes from the oil industry. Like Reagan, Bush fits the prophecy in remarkable detail on several points. Like Reagan, Bush has left office which proves that he is not the mythical “antichrist”, but this does not actually rule out the possibility that George Bush was the second beast of Revelation.

Again, this is not about politics. There is a reason why conservative leaders would be used to fulfill the prophecies. Reagan and Bush are able to fulfill prophecy without being noticed because conservatives support these Presidents and they do not look for them to fulfill prophecy. If Clinton had fulfilled prophecy, conservative Christians would be all over it. Liberals, even if they are Christians, tend to believe in preterism and they are not looking for prophecy to be fulfilled. By using conservative leaders whose fulfillment of prophecy is not going to be noticed, this suggests that the end is coming in a way that is secretive and unexpected. Anyone who has read the Bible should expect the unexpected in the coming of Armageddon.

There is no evil political leader who causes Armageddon, so it isn’t clear what the real cause of the destruction will be; but by fulfilling prophecy, Bush and Reagan do confirm that it is coming. If we look at the world right now there are a number of potential catastrophes any one of which could be the trigger for Armageddon. As the end draws closer, events may fit the prophecies perfectly, and yet have absolutely no resemblance to the common interpretation of prophecy so that no one notices that the prophecies are being fulfilled. This seems to be how it is playing out so far.
 
Nobody knows when its going to happen, except God the Father. There have been so many different times set on the second coming, Armageddon and whatever other names revaluations has, but to date, they’ve all been wrong.

It will happen but as Jesus said it will be like a thief in the night, unexpected and unpredictable.
 
The prophecy was given and Christ also said;

Mat 24:34 Amen I say to you that this generation shall not pass till all these things be done.
Some attribute His prophecy to be about the destruction of Jerusalem, which took place in 70AD, when the generation had not yet passed.

It’s also important to note Christ told them to ‘learn’ a parable, concerning the fig tree.

In Matthew 24, Christ was asked two questions. When would the buildings, the Temple, be so that one stone would not be on top of another and when would He return. Christ described the destruction of Jerusalem and He specifically told them that no one would know when He would return.
 
The first beast rises out of the sea. Which is out of the people. I recognise this as the rise of the Protestant beast. The second is an appostolic Church taken by fraud that makes an image to the first. Basically there will be a time in either the past or the future when the people of the world will recognize a Catholic Church that is not Catholic at all. This Church will be descernable by the people of God for its altering of the liturgy towards an image of the Protestant communion.

When this happens there will be be virtually no true communion available. The only option will be to take the lords name upon a vein thing (the unforgivable sin) and recieve symbolic communion or to not recieve the body and blood of Christ which is in itself a death sentence.
 
Nobody knows when its going to happen, except God the Father. There have been so many different times set on the second coming, Armageddon and whatever other names revaluations has, but to date, they’ve all been wrong.

It will happen but as Jesus said it will be like a thief in the night, unexpected and unpredictable.
No one knows when it will come, and prophecy shouldn’t even be used to try to predict the future. If we try to use the prophecy to predict the future we become locked in to a particular set of events, and this prevents us from seeing the fulfillment of prophecy if it happens some other way than what we were expecting. This is the problem with the whole idea that there will be an “antichrist”. The coming of an antichrist (political leader) is an interpretation and a prediction of what will happen.

I try to read prophecy to see what has perhaps already been fulfilled while keeping an open mind about what is going to happen next. I think it will happen in an unexpected way and it is very important that we keep an open mind and not try to predict the future.

Reagan was almost thirty years ago, and so it may be many more years before Christ returns. I have no idea when it will be, but by the fulfillment of prophecy I am reassured that Christ is Lord and He will return.
 
The first beast rises out of the sea. Which is out of the people. I recognise this as the rise of the Protestant beast. The second is an appostolic Church taken by fraud that makes an image to the first. Basically there will be a time in either the past or the future when the people of the world will recognize a Catholic Church that is not Catholic at all. This Church will be descernable by the people of God for its altering of the liturgy towards an image of the Protestant communion.
When this happens there will be be virtually no true communion available. The only option will be to take the lords name upon a vein thing (the unforgivable sin) and recieve symbolic communion or to not recieve the body and blood of Christ which is in itself a death sentence.
Which Protestant communion?
Jon
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top