The Fraud of Evolution

[rossum]

Author: Bruce Malone

It would be nice to know what you think, rather than what Bruce Malone thinks.

Truth operates regardless of the opinions of man just as gravity will operate regardless of belief, understanding, or interpretation. If the universe and mankind are direct creations of a personally involved God, then man’s interpretations do not diminish the truth of creation.

TRUTH may well operate so, but it is impossible to determine what TRUTH is, since all the methods we have to hand only deal with truth. All sacred texts are written using words, and mere words are in the realm of truth rather than TRUTH. To paraphrase the Tao Te Ching “The truth that can be written is not the real TRUTH.”

1. The bible states repeatedly that life produces only after its own kind. This is certainly true as we observe the biological world around us. Dogs stay dogs, people stay people. Yet evolution preaches that all life is a blurred continuum.

This statement is scientifically meaningless until you can give a scientific definition of “kind”. Are horses and donkeys the same kind or different? What about mules? Are lions and tigers the same kind? What about ligers and tigons? The evidence shows that life is indeed a blurred continuum. The further back you go the more blurred it is. Something like Halkieria has characteristics of three different modern phyla: brachiopods, annelids and molluscs.

1. The God of the Bible demands unselfish sacrifice for the good of others.

Evolution is not a religion and does not specify a morality. Is the Theory of Gravity wrong because it does not specify a morality? Why is evolution different from gravity in this respect?

1. Belief in evolution justified the excesses of the industrial revolution, the Nazi elimination of the Jews, and the rise of Marxism and Communism.

I can misuse a hammer to kill someone. Does that mean that all hammer owners should be imprisoned? The Nazis misused Darwin, Christianity, philosophy, politics, theology and anything else they thought would help their agenda. Evolution and Christianity were both in the same boat with respect to the Nazis.

There is abundant scientific evidence that macro-evolution has never taken place.

Your source is badly misinformed here. The statement you are quoting is false. If there is abundant information then you should be able to reference it.

The fossil record shows no credible links between major groups of plants and animals

False, I have already given the example of Halkieria above, and there are others such as Tiktaalik which is a good link between fish and amphibians, forming part of a series of such links including Pandericthys, Acanthostega and Icthyostega.

the chemical structure of DNA contains useful information which could not have developed by natural process

Again this is false. The process of natural selection picks out those organisms whose DNA best reflects their environment. This transfers information from the environment into their DNA over the generations.

and there is abundant evidence for a worldwide flood which contradicts evolution.

Laughably wrong. Even in 1510 Leonardo da Vinci could work out from the evidence in the rocks that the flood was wrong:If the Deluge had carried the shells for distances of three and four hundred miles from the sea it would have carried them mixed with various other natural objects all heaped up together; but even at such distances from the sea we see the oysters all together and also the shellfish and the cuttlefish and all the other shells which congregate together, found all together dead; and the solitary shells are found apart from one another as we see them every day on the sea-shores.
What is your evidence of a genetic bottleneck in all mammal species in the last 4000 years?

Evolution is a philosophy unsupported by the majority of scientific observations whose influence has been a detriment to society and true scientific advancement.

Pure rhetoric with no factual content: “Creationism is a philosophy unsupported by the majority of scientific observations whose influence has been a detriment to society and true scientific advancement.” See, it works just as well pointed the other way, a good sign of contentless rhetoric.

I suggest that you find a better source to cus-and-paste from.

rossum

 

[Eilrahc]

I’m very interested in that subject (prehistoric technologies). But it seems that most people who accept that these Ooparts did exsist would claim that extraterrestrials left 'em there.

Ancient man was not dumb, here’s a good website about the technologies of Ancient man: OOPARTS (out of place artifacts) & ANCIENT HIGH TECHNOLOGY–Evidence of Noah’s Flood?, so God would not have just made of a story for ancient man “because he wouldn’t understand the complexities of evolution”, because God cannot lie. All scripture is inspired by the Holy Spirit so, calling Genesis “myths” is calling God a lair.

 

[Michael_Francis]

Sticky: Temporary Ban on Evolution/Atheism Threads
(Please Note: This uploaded content is no longer available.)