Was his condemnation of Pope Francis deflection from his own role?Viganò wrote to Cardinal Ouellet, the new Prefect of the Congregation for Bishops, about this in 2012 and Ouellet instructed Viganò to take certain steps, including an inquiry with specific diocesan officials and Priest 3, to determine if the allegations were credible. Viganò did not take these steps and therefore never placed himself in the position to ascertain the credibility of Priest 3.
When one is in bed with the “Father of Lies,” others should not expect their “oath as a bishop” to be worth anything. This is where the Church should really subscribe to “trust, but verify.”McCarrick swore on his “oath as a bishop” that the allegations were false
Do you think that JP2 heard McCarrick’s confession, or that McCarrick would have confessed to the acts that he’s been accused of?As someone in the comments section mentioned, JPII who heard confessions didn’t believe the accusations against McCarrick because of false accusations stemming from old regimes? Really?
He might very well still be in complete denial that he did anything wrong.I really hope McCarrick is repenting of all the evil he’s done.
I hope not. He doesn’t have a lot of time left to get square with the house again.He might very well still be in complete denial that he did anything wrong.