The guy doesn’t get it: If all the people in the Church FOLLOWED Catholic Teachings, no abuses would have happened! However, in his church, THE ANGLICAN COMMUNION, homosexual acts are condoned for the sake of “justice” at the cost of the Gospels and souls.
Yes - they officially ordained a practicing homosexual, BECAUSE he was a practicing homosexual, in order to make the
point that homosexuality - that is,
the act of sodomy itself; not referring merely to a homosexual orientation - is
not considered by them to be a sin.
This is
completely different than what went on in the Catholic Church, where practicing homosexuals and sexual perverts were sneaking themselves into the priesthood (just as they do into coaching and teaching positions, and other positions that give them access to vulnerable persons), with nobody realizing what they were, and, after it was discovered, with Bishops who believed what they were told by supposed experts, that these guys were cured after a certain amount of counselling, and that they could go back to their active duties.
I do not believe that the Bishops were at fault when they believed what they were told - they moved the priests around because they thought they had been cured, and that they would not reoffend. Bishops are not mental health practitioners - they have to trust what they are told by experts, just like the rest of us. Most of them do not have the ability to read minds - so I don’t really know why they are being blamed for the crisis.
The people at fault are those who
actually did the awful things that were done. They were acting
against Church policy when they did so. They were not acting on behalf of the Church at the time that they did these things. To put it into perspective, if the person you share your office with does something illegal, that is against company policy, and he gets arrested, should you be sued by the victims, just because you happen to have money, and the guilty party happens to be broke? Just because you happen to work in the same office together?
