The Gospel according to Thomas?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jacob_B
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
J

Jacob_B

Guest
I was in the book store the other day and saw the “Gospel of Thomas” book. It said that Thomas’ Gospel had been discovered in recent years hidden in a cave somewhere, or something along those lines. Has the church spoken on this gospel? is it considered to be the truth and “on the same level” so to speak as the other four gospels in the Bible?
 
The other 4 gospels are part of the canon of the Bible. The canon is closed, no other book can be added to the Bible.

So, no, the “gospel of Thomas” it is not on the same level as the other 4 gospels. It is not the inspired word of God. Just because the title of it includes the word “gospel” does not put it on the same level as the New Testament gospels.
 
the gospel of thomas was not discovered recently, unless you call 1945 recent. It is part of the discovery of what is called the “Coptic Gnostic Library”, fragments of writings discovered at Nag Hammadi in Egypt. it is a coptic translation of a Greek text, the earliest fragment of which dates to 200 AD or so. The coptic translation was publishe din 1959, if you call that recent. Its existence was known to the Early Church by the beginning of the 3rd c. when it was mentioned by ECF such as Hippolytus who condemned it as Gnostic of spurious origin, not an authentic gospel, and not written, as some of the early Syriac churches taught, by Thomas Didymus.

It is one of the Gnostic gospels, which can be easily identified as they begin by claiming to be “secret” sayings of Jesus. Some of them repeat sayings that appear in the synoptic Gospels (the real ones) but there are additions, namely those in common with other Gnostic writings that label the flesh as inherently evil.

It was not included in the canon of sacred scripture, therefore it is not a Gospel, and it almost certainly was not written by Thomas, since the earliest reports of its existence are long after his probably death. Gnostic writings are usually introduced as “secret” in opposition to the canonical Gospels, which are proclaimed to the ends of the earth in their entirety, according to Jesus’ command, not reserved for a select few initiates.

The standard study text of the non-canonical so-called writings, The Other Gospels, ed. by Ron Cameron, 1989, Westminster Press. with annotated bibliography

The Christian’s time for bible study is limited, why not devote it to study of the actual scripture, not the spurious writings, which add absolutely nothing to the understanding of Jesus, his message, his Church or the Gospel.

there were dozens of various writings circulating in the 3d-4th century many claiming to be gospels authored by various of the apostles. Yes, the Church has spoken definitively on all these writings by establishing the Canon of Sacred Scripture which was closed with the death of the last apostle, John, and defined by the councils of the 4th c that addressed that task.
 
Additionally, I believe it is a Gnostic Gospel, written not be the Apostle Thomas, and written 100+ years after the death of Jesus.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top