The Great Whore of Babylon and her Harlot daughters!!!!

  • Thread starter Thread starter rafaelcatolico
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
The Great Whore of Babylon is Jerusalem because they did not recognized Jesus Christ as their Messiah. Babylon is the code name for Rome used by writers of the NT.

Babylon and the Harlot conspire to destroy the Christians. This all started after Jesus ascended into heaven, and when the Apostle preached the Gospels ‘orally.’

When the Sandhedrin noticed a large number of people converting to this religion of Christ, they tried to shut the Apostles out. The Apostle lead by Peter refuse and continue to preach the Good News.

The Sandhedrin (Pharisees) persecuted the Christians started with St. Stephen (first Christian martyr). Soon after that Saul seek out the Apostles and the Christians until he himself was converted.

Then later on indirectly in another part of the Roman Empire, a certain Roman Emperor Nero set fire to Rome. The Jewish leaders who did not like the Apostles convince Nero that it was Christians who burn. So Nero sent out an eddict throughout the Empire killing all Christians.

The killing ended when Nero erected a statue of himself in Holy Temple. The Jews became angry and revolted. Thus began the Jewish-Roman Wars 67-70 A.D. At this time, Christian persecution ended (only briefly, there would be other Emperors who would continue to persecute Christians). The Holy Temple Jerusalem was destroyed in 70 A.D just as Jesus predicted.

Whore of Babylon is Jerusalem, Harlots are the Jewish Leaders, and Babylon is Pagan Rome.
John is said to be written around 90 AD, how could he be giving a prophecy from events that just past.

Jerusalem does not sit on 7 hills? The woman is not Jerusalem. Jesus did predict the destruction of the temple, but this has nothing to do with the woman in Rev 17 being Jerusalem.

**

Rev 17

7 But the angel said to me, “Why did you marvel? I will tell you the mystery of the woman and of the beast that carries her, which has the seven heads and the ten horns. 8 The beast that you saw was, and is not, and will ascend out of the bottomless pit and go to perdition. And those who dwell on the earth will marvel, whose names are not written in the Book of Life from the foundation of the world, when they see the beast that was, and is not, and yet is.
9 “Here is the mind which has wisdom: The seven heads are seven mountains on which the woman sits. 10 There are also seven kings. Five have fallen, one is, and the other has not yet come. And when he comes, he must continue a short time. 11 The beast that was, and is not, is himself also the eighth, and is of the seven, and is going to perdition.

**
 
John is said to be written around 90 AD, how could he be giving a prophecy from events that just past.

Jerusalem does not sit on 7 hills? The woman is not Jerusalem. Jesus did predict the destruction of the temple, but this has nothing to do with the woman in Rev 17 being Jerusalem.

**

Rev 17

7 But the angel said to me, “Why did you marvel? I will tell you the mystery of the woman and of the beast that carries her, which has the seven heads and the ten horns. 8 The beast that you saw was, and is not, and will ascend out of the bottomless pit and go to perdition. And those who dwell on the earth will marvel, whose names are not written in the Book of Life from the foundation of the world, when they see the beast that was, and is not, and yet is.
9 “Here is the mind which has wisdom: The seven heads are seven mountains on which the woman sits**. 10 There are also seven kings. Five have fallen, one is, and the other has not yet come. And when he comes, he must continue a short time. 11 The beast that was, and is not, is himself also the eighth, and is of the seven, and is going to perdition.

The seven mountains or seven hills refer to seven pagan Roman Emperors who would be responsible for presecuting Christians. Do you assumed that the woman is the Catholic Church, which many hardcore Evangelical Christians proclaim the Catholic Church to be?

Many of them try to inteprete Revelations in the modern context. Revelations should be interprete in the context of the writer’s trying to convey when he wrote it. Half of the prohecy in Revelation has already been fulfilled except for the Second Coming of Christ. The woman in this passage can be also interpreted as Pagan Rome not the Catholic Church…
 
Sorry Garry, but your Mormon leaders have taught this doctrine and continue to teach it today.
Paul, I think we have our wires crossed here. Im not a Mormon nor have I ever been nor will Iever be. I belong to the one true Catholic and apolostic church, namely the Catholic Church.

I was replying to the unoriginal Anti Catholic mantra Ref Great Whore of Babylon **** … peddled by a crowd of not so well meaning imposters.

I hope this matter is closed.
 
Many of them try to inteprete Revelations in the modern context. Revelations should be interprete in the context of the writer’s trying to convey when he wrote it.
I agree. This has often been my point when arguing with SDA’s.The great President Jim Iicoudis president emeritus has written prolifically on the SDA and their criticism of the CC. I recommend going to the internet and looking at some of his works.
Half of the prohecy in Revelation has already been fulfilled except for the Second Coming of Christ.
The JW’s believe the second coming has already occured. They teach that Christ ‘sneaked back’ and took the elite with Him. This is definitely contrary to scripture which says the Second Coming will be a very visual and experiential event. Hardly indicative of the Lord sneaking about!!

If the SDA is right in being the true church, who do they think gave them the bible? Only 5 explanations are possible:

It was given by God as a written book

It was brought by angels

It was brought by aliens

It was concocted by a group of well intentioned story-writers

It was composed by the CC

Actually, I find the idea of the SDA a bit offencive to suggest that the blessed Lord had to wait 1860 years before the church of which He spoke could come into existence. Not a very credible God who cannot do better than that.

One wonders what will happen when the next sect comes into existence which also claims to be the ‘true church’ in opposition to the SDA. Logic says it will happen sooner or later 😉
 
Paul, I think we have our wires crossed here. Im not a Mormon nor have I ever been nor will Iever be. I belong to the one true Catholic and apolostic church, namely the Catholic Church.

I was replying to the unoriginal Anti Catholic mantra Ref Great Whore of Babylon **** … peddled by a crowd of not so well meaning imposters.

I hope this matter is closed.
Sorry Garry,
I misunderstood. The question posed by the OP was “Is this true, Is this Mormon doctrine?” So I thought you were a Mormon denying the prophets’ teachings, as they so often do. I am also Catholic, and an ex-Mormon to boot!

I should remember to check profiles.:o

God bless,
Paul
 
With the SDA, only two scenarios are possible: either they are 100% right of they are 100% wrong. There can be no middle way.

They ought to consider this. They are either the saints in heaven or they are persecuting Christ!!
 
John is said to be written around 90 AD, how could he be giving a prophecy from events that just past.

Jerusalem does not sit on 7 hills? The woman is not Jerusalem. Jesus did predict the destruction of the temple, but this has nothing to do with the woman in Rev 17 being Jerusalem.

**

Rev 17

7 But the angel said to me, “Why did you marvel? I will tell you the mystery of the woman and of the beast that carries her, which has the seven heads and the ten horns. 8 The beast that you saw was, and is not, and will ascend out of the bottomless pit and go to perdition. And those who dwell on the earth will marvel, whose names are not written in the Book of Life from the foundation of the world, when they see the beast that was, and is not, and yet is.
9 “Here is the mind which has wisdom: The seven heads are seven mountains on which the woman sits**. 10 There are also seven kings. Five have fallen, one is, and the other has not yet come. And when he comes, he must continue a short time. 11 The beast that was, and is not, is himself also the eighth, and is of the seven, and is going to perdition.
Read the Book of Daniel in the OT, The two books coincide with each other.
 
Welcome to the wonderful world of religion folks. Where everything thinks they have the answer and everyone else is wrong/ignorant/evil.

Kinda funny actually:p
 
Welcome to the wonderful world of religion folks. Where everything thinks they have the answer and everyone else is wrong/ignorant/evil.

Kinda funny actually:p
No body here claims everyone to be evil. Though however, there are those who are ignorant of Catholicism. This forum is meant to give Non-Catholic Christians what the Church actually teaches. Just as 1 Tim 3:15, the Pillar and Bulwark of the Truth is the Church.

The Church safe guard the Truth, which is revealed by Jesus Christ.
 
Critics of CC are either 100% right or they are 100% wrong.

If they are right, well done. If they are wrong??? what then?
 
The Great Whore of Babylon and her Harlot daughters!!!
This statement is refering to the Catholic Church and all Protestant churches since Luther, according to the LDS doctrine. IS THIS TRUE!? Any Mormons out there care to explain this to me? :confused:
Actually, the LDS church is a true and legitimate child of the Protestant Reformation. After all, if you reject the Church’s authority to be the sole interpreter of Scripture, then it’s not a big leap from there to rejecting her authority to be the sole producer of it. When the Mormon church came up with the Book of Mormon – unrestrained by sola scriptura, since the Bible doesn’t say there are no other Scriptures – all it really did was take personal judgment to a new (and entirely logical) level.

So I guess that would make the LDS church the Grandharlot of the Great Whore.
 
Ha Ha Ha. I am used to the woman I love [and whom Christ loves] being called ‘the Great Whore’, but I have never heard of Protestants called ‘her Harlots’. 😉 I do think it rather amusing that those who protest at us are tarred with the same brush. :cool:
It just keeps getting worse eh :rotfl: ! **What next ? **
God has to have a sense of humour!!!
.
 
The Great Whore of Babylon and her Harlot daughters!!!
This statement is refering to the Catholic Church and all Protestant churches since Luther, according to the LDS doctrine. IS THIS TRUE!? Any Mormons out there care to explain this to me? :confused:
Seventh Day Adventists believe the same.
 
No body here claims everyone to be evil. Though however, there are those who are ignorant of Catholicism. This forum is meant to give Non-Catholic Christians what the Church actually teaches. Just as 1 Tim 3:15, the Pillar and Bulwark of the Truth is the Church.

The Church safe guard the Truth, which is revealed by Jesus Christ.
I know, which is why I used this thingie /😛 The other religion are evil posts can be seen in other threads (esp. any with Islam in the title). My post was just pointing out that when it comes to religion (monotheistic ones anyways) they all claim to be 100% correct. Picking the right one or even denomination becomes very difficult as there are many truths, psedeotruths, rumos, stories, or even lies told.

When it comes to it, theres a better chance (statistically) of getting the right religion out of a hat:p Its ok to think christianity is correct, just dont be surprised when others claim the same;)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top