I
Iheartcoffee
Guest
I have to wonder how much of the pro-life movement’s success is due to something as simple as math. When the pro-choice and pro-contraception crowd are quite literally championing the merits of avoiding births you have to think they are digging their own grave.
In the approximately 50 years since the inception of the pill and about 40 years since the legalization of abortion, we are seeing a more pro-life youth movement. Many of these kids are 2+ generations removed from those that were young adults during the early 60’s. It looks to me like a good portion of the success of the pro-life movement’s growth can be attributed to the fact that the pro-life movement WANTS their members to multiply. While the pro-choice crowd must rely on bringing in new members because they fail to “grow their own” in such great numbers, pro-lifers are raising their own successors- and at numbers higher than the replacement rate in many families.
What do y’all think?
In the approximately 50 years since the inception of the pill and about 40 years since the legalization of abortion, we are seeing a more pro-life youth movement. Many of these kids are 2+ generations removed from those that were young adults during the early 60’s. It looks to me like a good portion of the success of the pro-life movement’s growth can be attributed to the fact that the pro-life movement WANTS their members to multiply. While the pro-choice crowd must rely on bringing in new members because they fail to “grow their own” in such great numbers, pro-lifers are raising their own successors- and at numbers higher than the replacement rate in many families.
What do y’all think?

:grouphug: