C
Captain_America
Guest
Great post! It’s valuable for everyone.
For me, one thing it points to is how VERY much we rely upon experts for judgments about aspects of moral issues.
However, the practice of science in 2014 is not what it was like in 1914. Scientific work is VERY sliced up, VERY small, small question-oriented. Scientists find SMALL answers; the scope of inquiry is tiny nowadays.
Our general difficulty—you see it in the press and in statements we all make—is to globalize and generalize these small, tentative conclusions. . . as definitive and final grand answers.
Here’s an example. Abortion: here, very little work was done on the personal impacts of abortion, when it was so hailed and advocated by the media and by the feminist groups of the 1960s and 1970s. SO the “scientific answer” was that the practice of abortion had no serious substantive impacts. This “science” helped make the case for many.
But as we now know, the impacts are many. Totaling it all up, the public view of abortion as problematic just grows.
PORN. In the long-term, I think more solutions will come up. We definitely need legal protections against it being so openly and subtly appearing on computers. There are plenty of legal precedents for these protections; I’m particularly concerned about children being safe from this HUGE mental onslaught. As a parent, I’m offended this industry for so long has been legislatively winked-at. . . OR worse, quietly considered to be the damnable price we pay for having the internet.
I rather expect that in the next 5-10 years, we’ll find solutions to this.
For me, one thing it points to is how VERY much we rely upon experts for judgments about aspects of moral issues.
However, the practice of science in 2014 is not what it was like in 1914. Scientific work is VERY sliced up, VERY small, small question-oriented. Scientists find SMALL answers; the scope of inquiry is tiny nowadays.
Our general difficulty—you see it in the press and in statements we all make—is to globalize and generalize these small, tentative conclusions. . . as definitive and final grand answers.
Here’s an example. Abortion: here, very little work was done on the personal impacts of abortion, when it was so hailed and advocated by the media and by the feminist groups of the 1960s and 1970s. SO the “scientific answer” was that the practice of abortion had no serious substantive impacts. This “science” helped make the case for many.
But as we now know, the impacts are many. Totaling it all up, the public view of abortion as problematic just grows.
PORN. In the long-term, I think more solutions will come up. We definitely need legal protections against it being so openly and subtly appearing on computers. There are plenty of legal precedents for these protections; I’m particularly concerned about children being safe from this HUGE mental onslaught. As a parent, I’m offended this industry for so long has been legislatively winked-at. . . OR worse, quietly considered to be the damnable price we pay for having the internet.
I rather expect that in the next 5-10 years, we’ll find solutions to this.