K
kesa82
Guest
I just got through reading this book on the building of ST. Peter’s Basilica by R.A. Scotti. I have multiple questions so I guess I’ll have to make multible threads.
Anyway, it says that when the Imperial army of Charles V sacked Rome, the soldiers took the heads of Peter and Paul out of the Reliquaries at ST. John Lateran and played ball with them.
Did I read that correctly, the heads of Peter and Paul?
Many thick books have been written on whether the Shroud of Turin is real or fake. Are there likewise thick books ( I love thick, detailed books, yum , yum ) in a similar vein on the heads of Peter and Paul and/or on Peter’s tomb?
Perhaps I should say here that it makes no difference to me whether the shroud is real or fake, whether a piece of the true cross is really a piece of the true cross , and if you could prove to me that Peter was buried in a ditch 6 miles away and dogs disposed of his bones two weeks later, it would in no way diminish my interest in or reverence for the tomb of saint Peter or these other relics. The significance of relics to me lies in something else - but that’s the subject for another thread. Anyway, my interest is intellectual interest.
Now if I can fit one more question here ;
In this same book it says that this Basilica of ST John Lateran is - or was - the oldest church in Rome and is - or was - the actual seat of the Bishop of Rome.
Now I’m confused. What does that make ST. Peter’s then ? Strictly the shrine of Saint Peter? A really big really fancy parish church ? An extra seat for the Pope ? what ? Does this ST. John Lateran still exist? Where in Rome would it be?
Anyway, it says that when the Imperial army of Charles V sacked Rome, the soldiers took the heads of Peter and Paul out of the Reliquaries at ST. John Lateran and played ball with them.
Did I read that correctly, the heads of Peter and Paul?
- THE Peter and Paul?
Many thick books have been written on whether the Shroud of Turin is real or fake. Are there likewise thick books ( I love thick, detailed books, yum , yum ) in a similar vein on the heads of Peter and Paul and/or on Peter’s tomb?
Perhaps I should say here that it makes no difference to me whether the shroud is real or fake, whether a piece of the true cross is really a piece of the true cross , and if you could prove to me that Peter was buried in a ditch 6 miles away and dogs disposed of his bones two weeks later, it would in no way diminish my interest in or reverence for the tomb of saint Peter or these other relics. The significance of relics to me lies in something else - but that’s the subject for another thread. Anyway, my interest is intellectual interest.
Now if I can fit one more question here ;
In this same book it says that this Basilica of ST John Lateran is - or was - the oldest church in Rome and is - or was - the actual seat of the Bishop of Rome.
Now I’m confused. What does that make ST. Peter’s then ? Strictly the shrine of Saint Peter? A really big really fancy parish church ? An extra seat for the Pope ? what ? Does this ST. John Lateran still exist? Where in Rome would it be?