Catholics in Maryland also welcomed Jews, which none of the other colonies did, at least not openly.
In addition, Maryland was one of the few states where the Church and the government actually cooperated on some projects without violating the Constitution. For example, Mother Seton’s Sister’s of Charity, who eventually merged with the Daughters of Charity, ran the first schools to offer the school lunch program for poor children in Baltimore. This later spread all over the country.
Bishop Carroll and his cousing James Carroll managed to get charters for Georgetown Colllege, which later became Georgetown University and St. Mary’s College, which later became Mt. St. Mary’s and today is St. Mary’s University. Marylanders managed to prove that the state and the Church could cooperate for the common good without violating the Constitution and without compromising the faith.
Catholics in Maryland cooperated in the underground railroad. Maryland was one of the few southern states that remaind faithful to union and to Catholic doctrine on social justice when it came to serving the needs of the poor.
The point that I’m making is that the “heresy of Americanism” was a valid concern of the Church and states like Maryland proved that one could be Catholic and American. The so called heresy was a belief that to be Catholic meant to be a papist and one should be suspect for being opposed to individual liberties, especially freedom of speech. There is not such a teaching in the Catholic Church. There never was.
There were individual popes and bishops who suppressed freedom of speech for their own purpose. But this was not a teaching of the Church. The teaching of the Church was and still is that silence in the face of error is wrong. Basically, the Church has always held, “The state has the obligation to ensure that what is said in public is truth and if it is not truth, it must allow for a rebuttal from those who know the truth.”
It seems that many felt and probably still do, that the Church has no right to make rules regulating freedom of speech. If freedom means that anyone can say anything they want without opposition, why can’t I yell out, “Fire!” in a movie theatre?
Fraternally,
Br. JR, OSF
