C
catholic1seeks
Guest
There’s going to be a show (broadcasted locally) on tonight about the “historical” Jesus.
Though I thought anything from history about Jesus supports his existence, others use the facts to create ideas about him that are not traditional:
…
pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/religion/
What should one be cautious of? It seems as if the only point of these shows is to tear down the faith of people.
Also:

Please take a look at the provided link.
Does anyone know of good resources about the traditional AND historical Jesus vs. THEIR “historical” Jesus?
Though I thought anything from history about Jesus supports his existence, others use the facts to create ideas about him that are not traditional:
HOUR ONE examines how Judaism and the Roman empire shaped Jesus’ life. Jesus was an ordinary Jewish resident of his time, **but new archaeological findings show that Jesus was probably not the humble village peasant often portrayed **(audio excerpt). Nazareth, where he grew up, was about four miles from the cosmopolitan urban center of Sepphoris, one of the Roman provincial cities.
…
*This FRONTLINE series is an intellectual and visual guide to the new and *controversial historical evidence which challenges familiar assumptions about the life of Jesus and the epic rise of Christianity.
pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/religion/
What should one be cautious of? It seems as if the only point of these shows is to tear down the faith of people.
Also:
The clash of customs and cultures among early Christians yielded a Jesus of many different interpretations and multiple messages
What? But I thought the one, true Catholic Church kept things orthodox. Please take a look at the provided link.
Does anyone know of good resources about the traditional AND historical Jesus vs. THEIR “historical” Jesus?