B
benhur
Guest
Again gave ECF quotes that challenge or add to your view of Matt. Furthermore it says nothing of succession beyond Peter being the leader of the apostles.I would like to point out in mho that first of all in the Four Gospels Peter is ranked first among all the Apostles, there must be a reason for this or why would the Gospel writers include it in their Gospel accounts? In Matthew 16: 13-20 Jesus tells Peter that he is the rock that He (Jesus) will build His Church on. He does not say to all of the Apostles that He will build His Church on them but only on Peter. Now why would Matthew write this? What was the reason as to why Matthew includes this passage on his Gospel account if not to imply that Peter is to be the head of the Church Jesus is building though them (the Apostles). Why not just say that Jesus wanted all of the Apostles to be the rock that He would build His Church on? It seems to me that Jesus is saying that His Church is to be built on Peter, that Peter is the rock which implies that Peter is solid and Jesus’ Church will be built on this solid foundation that is Peter, which also implies that it is to Peter to govern the Church with the rest of the Apostles supporting Peter.
Code:It seems to me that Matthew's Gospel account in 16 is saying that Jesus is saying that Peter is to be the head of the Church. Jesus is not saying that all of the Apostles are to be head of the Church or to start separate Churches but what Jesus is saying is that Peter is to be the head, that is authority over all of the Apostles and the Churches that are founded by them. Not to have an head is to bring chaos disunity.