The RC View towards homosexuality is no one’s concern but followers. It is vital, for instance, that Catholics are never compelled to adhere to the beliefs of agnostics, hindus or Evangelical Christians. We are free to practice religion or to be free of any practice. Under our legal system it is intolerable, illegal and must be corrected when any person or group receives disparate treatment when all humans are protected equally by the law. Therefore, while the “sacrament” of marriage is reserved for man and woman in the eyes of many religious leaders, it’s is outside of the spiritual realm where civil law extends the marital right to every adult citizen, equal under our constitution, and codifies a partnership and promise into a sanctioned bond between two people, and it’s universally recognized. With the contract of marriage creating “one-person” in many ways, before the law. In fact, the institutions of government, representing the civilized and collective efforts of a nation, to assert a common good and public purpose.
The term Homosexual Agenda and Obamacare have been linked so Obama appears to support gay-marriage. He is absolutely opposed to gay marriage. Our moderate-right President consistently demonstrates his centrists “realism.” Pragmatic or a true moderate, the term communist demonstrates America’s flare for the dramatic. Perhaps it’s simply that this outright lie is merely an exagerration in terms to make a point. Here’s a point that needs no hyperbole: It’s racism that fuels so much of this centrist President’s opposition, “rugged-indicidualist,” and Religious law as every person’s truth, to abide by. This communist foreign born and Islamist man is failing even as a consensus seeker - his opponents want nothing to pass- he is not the Party Leader, and he can’t work his or any legislative officials. Kennedy suffered defeated legislation because he failed to lead the Dems. Johnson, a lifelong Senator, passed the most powerful anti-poverty, civil rights and medical legislation. He knew the legislature and commanded his party, House and Senate reps. Any group who is moved to stand in opposition to civil marriage, a sacred American institution; and yes, an undeniable right; every man is to be treated equally under the law.
Is homosexuality a genetic trait or a choice? Perhaps it’s some variation of the two determinants? While religious groups inform new couples of practices which are acceptable, and the forbidden acts that are believed to offend God. It is only the couple that knows, determines, and shares adult acts. If the adults here are same-sex , and they choose to engage in sexual behavior, it’s not necessary to decide if the cause is “gay by birth” or otherwise. It’s not as though there is any bearing on whether you accept them. They are as free behave in consensual adult behavior - even acts that are not desirable to “most.”, even repulsive to many, as a heterosexual couple might indulge in whatever you determine unconventional.
The RC Church is not an institution of equality. It’s roles are well-defined. It is not obligated to treat its worshippers as equal under Canon Law, or otherwise. Unless religious groups seek gov’t regulation, the secular institutions which protect it, also must act outside and independant of any/all holy books or spiritual texts.
