S
Impeach Cheney FIRST, then Bush.
Never us mind that President Bush hasn’t done anything impeachable.Republican-controlled Congress. Both Houses. Unless Mr. Bush posts the red-button codes on the Internet, it ain’t gonna happen.
Mark, Mark, Mark…haven’t we already concluded that the facts do NOT matter? Also as usual the two writers claim that Clinton’s impeachment was due to minor sexual pecadillos, not due to his lying and obstruction of justice. But again, the blue dress caper makes so much better headlines than mundane rules and regulations.Never us mind that President Bush hasn’t done anything impeachable.
– Mark L. Chance.
Has there ever been any authoritative statistical correlation between the days Clinton attacked other countries, aspirin factories and the like, and the days there was to be front page news on the sex/obstruction scandal? Statistics can be used to indict a company of discrimination, but I’m sure it works differently with presidents.Mark, Mark, Mark…haven’t we already concluded that the facts do NOT matter? Also as usual the two writers claim that Clinton’s impeachment was due to minor sexual pecadillos, not due to his lying and obstruction of justice. But again, the blue dress caper makes so much better headlines than mundane rules and regulations.
Lisa N
I don’t remember where I first heard it, but I found a compilation of Democrats, including presidents Bill and Hillary, saying the same sort of stuff on snopes.Really? How did you hear about Kerry doing that?
"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction. "[W]ithout question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime … He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation. And now he has continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction … So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real …
Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003.
The real reason the war is “illegal” is that Bush got credit for it because Clinton, though he wanted it badly, did not engage in it.
Oh, before anyone asks about that:
“One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line.”
President Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998.
“If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction program.”
President Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998.
I’m not saying Republicans are angels; only that Democrats are not anywhere near honest on this issue.
Alan
Source: snopes.com/politics/war/wmdquotes.asp
What makes factcheck.com better than snopes? Is it more independent?Actually, a much better resource than snopes.com is this:
factcheck.org/
If you all recall, Dick Cheney quoted this site in the VP debate.
Both sides seem to share equally in lies and/or distortions.
It’s more comprehensive and only focuses on the political landscape.What makes factcheck.com better than snopes? Is it more independent?
Bing! Bing! Bing! Give that lady a prize!!!Mark, Mark, Mark…haven’t we already concluded that the facts do NOT matter? Also as usual the two writers claim that Clinton’s impeachment was due to minor sexual pecadillos, not due to his lying and obstruction of justice. But again, the blue dress caper makes so much better headlines than mundane rules and regulations.
Lisa N
You hit it right on the head, BRAVO!!! :clapping: :clapping:You can’t have a government better than the people being governed are willing to be.
When one calls on us to impeach the president, it kinda falls apart.This seemed like such a promising thread…what happened??