Yeah, I understand. I wasn’t really condemning the book, since there are many good things in there, and there’s nothing necessarily wrong with hyperbole either. It’s just that it would be good to have a bit of a revised version of the book that is more grounded in the essential message, and is a bit less intense.
And yeah, it’s not that hard to accept the fact we are imperfect sinners even if it’s described hyperbolically - evil, dust and ashes. Imagine if you had an exhausting day, or had to do boring, frustrating work for several hours, and after someone asked you how your day was you said it was just horrible, or just torture. In that sense, horrible doesn’t mean actually horrible in the serious sense of the word, and neither does torture.
So in the same way, it can be said that even those who, for example, only commit venial sins, are horrible people - not actually seriously bad people, but compared to sinlessness are just frustrating - just like a day that is exhausting to you is horrible compared to a day filled with enjoyment and pleasure, so a person with many venial sins is “horrible” compared to being sinless and holy - without being demeaning or harsh at all, since the horribleness is bearable and not… horrible (oh look a pun!). It’s just humility - knowing you have flaws even if they are venial, non-serious and aren’t biggies, and that they are bad to have and should be fought.