The article is about the fact that capitalism appears not to be working. Do you think that the only other option is comminism? From memory, it’s been tried before and that failed as well. I think we could consider them to be the two extremes when it comes to political ideology so maybe you could suggest something less extreme.So then please pray tell what would be your solution? Communism?
The article highlighted the problem in that we have a large financial difference between the few people that control most of the money and the large minority who have very little indeed. Would you consider that a fairer tax system would be one that addressed that problem?Describe “fair taxes”, because what’s fair to Joe the plumber may not be fair to Alexandra the Democratic Socialist.
Maybe instead of taxing people to death we should reform the broken fiat monetary system.
How is capitalism not working?So capitalism is the problem because it’s not working. And the rich get richer and the poor poorer. Sounds about right to me.
Well, when the sites that promoted carbon taxes are saying it’s not working, it’s probably not working.Depends on how you define “working”.
Taxation of the very wealthy in many western countries seems underdone. Warren Buffet has commented on that.Maybe instead of taxing people to death we should reform the broken fiat monetary system.
Capitalism is a “broad church”. Capitalist economies with insufficient regulation, or with inadequately progressive taxation regimes can produce extremely skewed societies where the gap between rich and poor is excessive.How is capitalism not working?
The poor are far far better off in the countries that have embraced capitalism.
So for you, it’s all about the gap with the rich.Capitalism is a “broad church”. Capitalist economies with insufficient regulation, or with inadequately progressive taxation regimes can produced extremely skewed societies where the gap between rich and poor is excessive.
For me it’s about observing that “capitalism” is not a singular system. There are vast numbers of levers and wide discretion over how they are set, though we continue to describe the resulting system as “capitalism”. This I think is the more important and relevant point given we have no intention of adopting a system we’d call communist in our western countries.So for you, it’s all about the gap with the rich.
Not whether the poor are better off or not.
Probably we take a greater interest in the situation of our neighbour than of boats?I recognized that capitalism raises all the boats, but some boats float better than others.
I think we agree here, there are many areas to ‘fine tune’ the system of capitalism, many subtle but important differences between countries that embrace capitalism.For me it’s about observing that “capitalism” is not a singular system. There are vast numbers of levers and wide discretion over how they are set, though we continue to describe the resulting system as “capitalism”. This I think is the more important and relevant point given we have no intention of adopting a system we’d call communist in our western countries.
Stop pretending you don’t understand common analogies. I’m for the system that better helps my neighbor as well (raises their boat). I just don’t let envy that some do far better direct me to break the system that is working.Probably we take a greater interest in the situation of our neighbour than of boats?