H
HarryStotle
Guest
I suppose itās better than living in the pastā¦
You are living in another century.
ā¦ or in a utopian dream world.
I suppose itās better than living in the pastā¦
You are living in another century.
When you bought your home, did you follow your own advice and pay in cash or did you go against your advice and go into debt by assuming a mortgage?(we own our own home) paid off by hard work and careful budgeting.
There no need to put āthe necessitiesā in scare quotes. Iām quoting you. But maybe it doesnāt sound so good if you say you were working two jobs sonthat you could retire comfortably.Freddy:
Iām a geezerā¦āThe necessitiesā included a mortgage at 11%, helping younger siblings get started, and saving and investing so that we could retire comfortably, young enough to enjoy retirement. Itās called ābeing responsibleā.It honestly has me scratching my head that anyone who has admitted needing to work two jobs for twenty years to cover the necessities appears to think that itās a normal state of affairs.
Noā¦youāre paraphrasing meā¦There no need to put āthe necessitiesā in scare quotes. Iām quoting you.
Again, itās called personal responsibility. Iāve volunteered at my parish food bank [two different parishes] for more than 35 years, and seen many seniors come in month after month to help make ends meet. Iād rather be in a position to help those in need, and since I was blessed with the ability to work two jobs, Iām able to do this. Are you familiar with the corporal works of mercy?. But maybe it doesnāt sound so good if you say you were working two jobs sonthat you could retire comfortably.
Agreed. I donāt think the US is in any danger of reaching these limits. And in various overseas jurisdictions, it may be large foreign corporations that are undertaxed. I am surprised there has not been a greater move to introduce turnover taxes, rather than to continue to manage complex rules around profit shifting and the like.The truth is that when you hike taxes beyond a reasonable share, the wealthy will simply leave the jurisdiction for locales that do not tax at irrational rates. With free trade agreements in place and manifold ways of āinvestingā money to make it tax exempt, the wealthy can quite easily move money to where it will better serve their ambitions.
You may be mixing up " Distributism" with āsubsidiarityāThatās not what the Catholic theologians and philosophers who developed distributionism taught
I prefer oranges.You are mixing up ādistributionismā with āsubsidiarityā
Apples and Oranges.
The US has been the highest for corporate taxes, thatās confirmed and it does impact decision making.Agreed. I donāt think the US is in any danger of reaching these limits. And in various overseas jurisdictions, it may be large foreign corporations that are undertaxed.
I have never in my life held a mortgage.HarryStotle:
When you bought your home, did you follow your own advice and pay in cash or did you go against your advice and go into debt by assuming a mortgage?(we own our own home) paid off by hard work and careful budgeting.
Migration of corporations is not on the table. Iām thinking of, say a google. Donāt know or care where they are domiciled, but their operation in āotherā countries sometimes attract minimal tax for complex reasons. An approach is for those foreign jurisdictions to avoid the traditional complexities and tax based on revenue earned from the customers in the foreign jurisdiction.Itās just an opinion that you feel other countries donāt tax enough, people and businesses will still migrate to the lower tax location. Itās healthy competition that keeps a check on governments.
Itās a lucky man who can buy a house without the need to borrow!I have never in my life held a mortgage.
Nice! Did you pay cash for your house and buy your house without the need to borrow any money at all?I have never in my life held a mortgage.
That depends on a lot of factors. When you add together property taxes, utilities, insurance costs, mortgage costs, interest rates, legal fees, current income, maintenance costs over time, property value trends, how long you are planning to stay in the location, job security, investment savvy, etc., it isnāt always the case that it is fiscally responsible to purchase.Is very, very poor advice. It is much better to buy a house with the money of the bank than to pay rent for the same house and end up with nothing after 30 years,.
One thing to keep in mind is that when you take out a 30 year fixed mortgage, your mortgage payments (principal and interest) to the bank remain constant over 30 years. It is true though that your insurance and property taxes can increase somewhat. However, generally, if you rent a place, your rent is going to increase quite a bit more over this period.That depends on a lot of factors.
Depends on your mortgage. A fixed rate over thirty years will mean quite a substantial amount more goes into the interest costs. A $200 000 mortgage over 30 years (4.5%) would cost about $100 000 more in interest compared to 15 years. An adjustable rate open mortgage amortized over thirty years, but open on payments ā for example doubling up every month ā could save a great deal of money since doubling up payments, as often as possible, reduces the length of the mortgage. Fixed 30 year mortgages generally have the highest interest rates. So it depends on your capacity to make payments.HarryStotle:
One thing to keep in mind is that when you take out a 30 year fixed mortgage, your mortgage payments (principal and interest) to the bank remain constant over 30 years.That depends on a lot of factors.