The Immorality of Money Printing and Why It's Driving the World To Socialism

  • Thread starter Thread starter JimG
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
(we own our own home) paid off by hard work and careful budgeting.
When you bought your home, did you follow your own advice and pay in cash or did you go against your advice and go into debt by assuming a mortgage?
 
40.png
Freddy:
It honestly has me scratching my head that anyone who has admitted needing to work two jobs for twenty years to cover the necessities appears to think that itā€™s a normal state of affairs.
Iā€™m a geezerā€¦ā€˜The necessitiesā€™ included a mortgage at 11%, helping younger siblings get started, and saving and investing so that we could retire comfortably, young enough to enjoy retirement. Itā€™s called ā€˜being responsibleā€™.
There no need to put ā€˜the necessitiesā€™ in scare quotes. Iā€™m quoting you. But maybe it doesnā€™t sound so good if you say you were working two jobs sonthat you could retire comfortably.
 
There no need to put ā€˜the necessitiesā€™ in scare quotes. Iā€™m quoting you.
Noā€¦youā€™re paraphrasing meā€¦
. But maybe it doesnā€™t sound so good if you say you were working two jobs sonthat you could retire comfortably.
Again, itā€™s called personal responsibility. Iā€™ve volunteered at my parish food bank [two different parishes] for more than 35 years, and seen many seniors come in month after month to help make ends meet. Iā€™d rather be in a position to help those in need, and since I was blessed with the ability to work two jobs, Iā€™m able to do this. Are you familiar with the corporal works of mercy?
 
The truth is that when you hike taxes beyond a reasonable share, the wealthy will simply leave the jurisdiction for locales that do not tax at irrational rates. With free trade agreements in place and manifold ways of ā€œinvestingā€ money to make it tax exempt, the wealthy can quite easily move money to where it will better serve their ambitions.
Agreed. I donā€™t think the US is in any danger of reaching these limits. And in various overseas jurisdictions, it may be large foreign corporations that are undertaxed. I am surprised there has not been a greater move to introduce turnover taxes, rather than to continue to manage complex rules around profit shifting and the like.
 
Thatā€™s not what the Catholic theologians and philosophers who developed distributionism taught
You may be mixing up " Distributism" with ā€œsubsidiarityā€
Apples and Oranges.

Distributism is an economic theory. It may have been partially inspired by Catholic social teachings but it is not Catholic nor is it the economic theory pushed by the Church.

Itā€™s also a theory thatā€™s never been put into practice by any country.
 
Last edited:
Agreed. I donā€™t think the US is in any danger of reaching these limits. And in various overseas jurisdictions, it may be large foreign corporations that are undertaxed.
The US has been the highest for corporate taxes, thatā€™s confirmed and it does impact decision making.

Itā€™s just an opinion that you feel other countries donā€™t tax enough, people and businesses will still migrate to the lower tax location. Itā€™s healthy competition that keeps a check on governments.

 
40.png
HarryStotle:
(we own our own home) paid off by hard work and careful budgeting.
When you bought your home, did you follow your own advice and pay in cash or did you go against your advice and go into debt by assuming a mortgage?
I have never in my life held a mortgage.
 
Itā€™s just an opinion that you feel other countries donā€™t tax enough, people and businesses will still migrate to the lower tax location. Itā€™s healthy competition that keeps a check on governments.
Migration of corporations is not on the table. Iā€™m thinking of, say a google. Donā€™t know or care where they are domiciled, but their operation in ā€œotherā€ countries sometimes attract minimal tax for complex reasons. An approach is for those foreign jurisdictions to avoid the traditional complexities and tax based on revenue earned from the customers in the foreign jurisdiction.

In the us, I was referring to personal taxes where the very wealthy are perhaps undertaxed.
 
My wife and I married in our late twenties and by then had each saved enough money to cover a good chunk of the price. It was a private sale where we saved real estate fees. The house was smallish, but we have added to it and renovated as we could afford. Remember that the average price of a home in 1980 was ~$50 000.

Back then (mid 1970s to 1985) Canada had what was called a RHOSP (registered home ownership saving plan) where the money was tax sheltered while saving and $1000 each year was tax deductible. That was a time when governments actually served the people by finding ways to support life goals, instead of bribing them with their own money.
 
Is very, very poor advice. It is much better to buy a house with the money of the bank than to pay rent for the same house and end up with nothing after 30 years,.
That depends on a lot of factors. When you add together property taxes, utilities, insurance costs, mortgage costs, interest rates, legal fees, current income, maintenance costs over time, property value trends, how long you are planning to stay in the location, job security, investment savvy, etc., it isnā€™t always the case that it is fiscally responsible to purchase.
 
Last edited:
That depends on a lot of factors.
One thing to keep in mind is that when you take out a 30 year fixed mortgage, your mortgage payments (principal and interest) to the bank remain constant over 30 years. It is true though that your insurance and property taxes can increase somewhat. However, generally, if you rent a place, your rent is going to increase quite a bit more over this period.
Suppose now that you had rented the house for 30 years. At the end of 30 years, you have your rental receipts AND you still have to pay monthly rent.
OTOH, if you had taken out a mortgage, at the end of 30 years, you donā€™t have to pay any more to the mortgage company and you have your house free and clear which you can sell at any time at a substantial price.
 
40.png
HarryStotle:
That depends on a lot of factors.
One thing to keep in mind is that when you take out a 30 year fixed mortgage, your mortgage payments (principal and interest) to the bank remain constant over 30 years.
Depends on your mortgage. A fixed rate over thirty years will mean quite a substantial amount more goes into the interest costs. A $200 000 mortgage over 30 years (4.5%) would cost about $100 000 more in interest compared to 15 years. An adjustable rate open mortgage amortized over thirty years, but open on payments ā€“ for example doubling up every month ā€“ could save a great deal of money since doubling up payments, as often as possible, reduces the length of the mortgage. Fixed 30 year mortgages generally have the highest interest rates. So it depends on your capacity to make payments.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top