The joylessness of Catholicism by the numbers

  • Thread starter Thread starter AlexV
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Berating them, though, for blowing on a candle too hard would, however, seem to be overly harsh for first graders.

I can say at least from my uncle’s experience in the Philippines, that cruelty or at least overwhelming strictness was somewhat the norm, and this was largely reinforced in the home. My grandfather grew up in the Second World War, and was a cop in the middle of a military dictatorship. Society valued on the surface a certain rigidity. He could be very harsh, which is strange because now he’s always so gentle. I guess he realized his mistake. But back in the old days everyone was like that, especially after the War.

My uncle and much of my mom’s family went to Catholic school. There was a pattern in those priests and religious educated in America or primarily by Americans (mostly Irish Americans) tended to be very rigid, joyless types, while those who were educated in, say, Spain, or in the country tended to be more joyful, though still orthodox.
OTOH, I found the teachers in the U.K. back in the 50’s to be far stricter and meaner than the nuns in the U.S. at the time. Where I attended school in London, it wasn’t uncommon to have multiple scars or imprints across the palm of your hands from the teachers’ stick just for having an inkblot in your exercise book. And then to have to be humiliated as you stood in front of the class getting your hand whacked…
 
OTOH, I found the teachers in the U.K. back in the 50’s to be far stricter and meaner than the nuns in the U.S. at the time. Where I attended school in London, it wasn’t uncommon to have multiple scars or imprints across the palm of your hands from the teachers’ stick just for having an inkblot in your exercise book. And then to have to be humiliated as you stood in front of the class getting your hand whacked…
I think you must have gone to a very strict school. I went to school in the UK in the 50s and don’t remember anything like that.

True, there was the strap, administered by the headteacher, but that was only for very rare occasions.
 
But here’s a piece of advice to such Catholics: your attitude may well do harm to the goal of evangelization. Your attitude may drive potential Catholics from your chapels and churches. Your attitude may well convey the impression to such individuals that they would want no part of such a practice.
THANK YOU. This needs to be said. “Joyless” is a perfect description. Observation of ALL the rules is just the table ante, what it costs to get into the game. Our duty as Catholic Christians merely begins there. But making rigid observation of the rules a fetish is wrong. It is the means to the end and not an end in itself. Our end is to know love and serve God in this world and to be happy with him forever in the next. Fixating on the rules obstructs our ability to love God and others. We must follow the rules, all of them, but we must take it well beyond there.

Such people as you’re describing are also masters of the false dichotomy. If you take them to task for the legalistic attitude, then straight away you’re somehow advocating the loosie-goosey anything goes brand of Catholicism. There’s nothing in between. I wish they’d put down the rule books and rubrics long enough to study the Gospels. They’d see Jesus saying he did not come to abolish the law but rather to fulfil it by teaching us the way to heaven. The people who invariably caused Jesus to lose his temper were the rule-obsessed pharisees. Perhaps our friends should look closely at the gospels to learn from Jesus’s passionate reactions against this very demeanor.

Measuring everything out by adherence to the rules is evidence of a lack of both faith and charity. Most of all it’s indicative of a deep mistrust of God. That is a spiritual sickness.

“And what is the secret of perseverance? Love. Fall in Love, and you will not leave him.”
  • St. Josemaria Escriva, from The Way, point #999.
 
The people who invariably caused Jesus to lose his temper were the rule-obsessed pharisees. Perhaps our friends should look closely at the gospels to learn from Jesus’s passionate reactions against this very demeanor.
Matthew Chapter 23
1: Then said Jesus to the crowds and to his disciples,
2: "The scribes and the Pharisees sit on Moses’ seat;
3: so practice and observe whatever they tell you, but not what they do; for they preach, but do not practice.
Measuring everything out by adherence to the rules is evidence of a lack of both faith and charity. Most of all it’s indicative of a deep mistrust of God. That is a spiritual sickness.
Thank you, for your judgement and condemnation. :tiphat:
 
I think you must have gone to a very strict school. I went to school in the UK in the 50s and don’t remember anything like that.

True, there was the strap, administered by the headteacher, but that was only for very rare occasions.
To be fair, though, I still admired the British way of teaching religion among other things at the time. I became more open to ecumenism than perhaps many of my U.S. classmates were.
 
I was raised Protestant and we had rules, too… they weren’t liturgical, but they were definitely behavioral…I became a Catholic as an adult because I am at a point in my life where history and ritual have become very important to me .This would not have been my position a few years ago. I agree with the stance many of you have made… transformation, knowing Jesus, letting Christ into your heart is the bottom line. That is what is most important. If rituals are important to you, you should not be judged. But if rituals AREN’T that important to you, you should not be judged for that, either. Everyone is on a journey and Christ is with us every step of the way. I have learned through the years to give up my judgment of others and to worry most about how I am Jesus’ hands and feet in the world and making sure I treat everyone with love and respect. I have found great peace and joy in the Catholic Church and honestly feel like I have found the “pearl of great price”. I love being Catholic, love going to Mass and love being part of this institution that has been around for so long with such a rich history. I now walk a line …I have one foot in the Catholic Church and one foot in the Protestant world (family and close friends are all still Protestant). I believe we are unified more than we are divided and try to live my life in a way that would be pleasing to God.
 
I’m just having a terrible time relating to the complaints in this thread.
Obviously. I can’t see the “joyless ness”. I’m close
to sixty, been attending the Church all my life,
both Melkite and Roman, my parents were Catholic as
well as my grandparents and in laws, probably because
we qualify as legalistic joyless types and never
bothered to look outside our own faith when marrying.
My children attended a terrifically traditionally Catholic
school complete with the rarity in the late 90’s of being
taught by actual nuns and priest not so much laity.
The school principal was the mother superior with
a vow of silence! She was happy as a clam lol and the
kids lived her and all their teachers.
I admit that in 2003 I did meet a priest who was
mean just plain mean. But he was a vacation relief
priest who we never saw again. But yes I did meet
one mean priest in my lifetime.
I have never witnessed any of this stuff y’all are
complaining about but sorry you have been unhappy
with your experiences in Catholicism.
But you know what? Jesus never said: "For a
good time, follow me."I’ve actually worried that
we weren’t suffering enough in my family but then
again it does take a certain disposition.
I’m glad to read the experiences of those cradle Catholics such as yourself who can relate family experiences through the generations. Those of us who are converts can learn a lot from this.

I especially like your story about the nun who was the school principle of your children’s school who was happy yet had taken a vow of silence. From a purely humanistic view, this just would not be possible (to be happy even when not ever talking to others). But this seems like one of the beauties of the Catholic faith - a sign of contradiction to worldly values, and finding joy in it. And you’re right…Jesus never said ‘for a good time follow me.’
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top