The Left’s Post-Trump Enemies List

  • Thread starter Thread starter JimG
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
In The Federalist there is a link to Trump Accountability website (I don’t want to link it) with this quote:

Sign up to be the first to know when we launch the definitive factual record of those who enabled the Trump era

and then it includes these three groups of people will be targeted:

Those who elected him,
Those who staffed his government and
Those who funded him.

This is horrible and where we are headed but not surprising.

📿 pray the rosary
 
Last edited:
Reminds me of the accusations of treason and aiding and abetting terrorism during the Bush era.
 
Will they seek out Trump suporters on CAF for public shaming or worse? Or maybe just go after all Catholics for actually being Catholic?
 
MagdalenaRita said:
then maybe clarify. thanks
Click to expand...
During the Bush administrations there were tons of calls for liberals and leftists to be tried as traitors by right wing radio hosts and other figures. Now the right is getting a taste of their own medicine and they’re complaining.
 
Last edited:
JimG said:
Will they seek out Trump suporters on CAF for public shaming or worse?
Click to expand...
Assuming this bizarre crusade ever takes off, I imagine only his top financial supporters and aids will be harassed.

If they begin doxing the average citizen like you and me, well, that’s the beginning of a civil war.
 
StudentMI said:
During the Bush administrations there were tons of calls for liberals and leftists to be tried as traitors by right wing radio hosts and other figures. Now the right if getting a taste of their own medicine and they’re complaining.
Click to expand...
That is exactly what I thought you meant. Calls by radio hosts, talking heads, asking to look into and try suspects of those who may have aided and abetted foreign terrorists is not the same thing as having government officials of the United States seek out all the supporters of the previous president’s administration because they did not like him.
JimG said:
Or maybe just go after all Catholics for actually being Catholic?
Click to expand...
This is just where I believe we are headed.
 
MagdalenaRita said:
That is exactly what I thought you meant. Calls by radio hosts, talking heads, asking to look into and try suspects of those who may have aided and abetted foreign terrorists is not the same thing as having government officials of the United States seek out all the supporters of the previous president’s administration because they did not like him.
Click to expand...
What’s good for the goose and all that. It starts with calls of treason against innocent civilians which you’re excusing.
 
StudentMI said:
What’s good for the goose and all that. It starts with calls of treason against innocent civilians which you’re excusing.
Click to expand...
As I said, the difference is one is another civilian just talking, the other is a government official keeping track of a list of names…
 
Last edited:
MagdalenaRita said:
As I said, the difference is one is another civilian just talking, the other is a government official keeping track of a list of names…
Click to expand...
Maybe they’ll make allegations about a ‘deep state’ like Trump and then use the claim to justify messing up an agency’s work like the Republicans did.
 
Reasonable or not, I think it is quite possible. The left tends to be quite intolerant of non-conforming opinions.
 
JimG said:
Reasonable or not, I think it is quite possible. The left tends to be quite intolerant of non-conforming opinions.
Click to expand...
That’s why the left is always pushing for diversity in opinions and in the makeup of groups? Because it is so intolerant of non-conforming opinions? I think you are in error.

The left may roundup Catholics? That’s not going to happen.

People fail to realize that the only real attempt at revolution in America in the last 100 years was a right wing coup plan, not anything from the left.
 
Last edited:
Nepperhan said:
That’s why the left is always pushing for diversity in opinions and in the makeup of groups? Because it is so intolerant of non-conforming opinions? I think you are in error.
Click to expand...
Diversity of opinions? Watching recent and not so recent confirmation hearings, it seems that anyone who accepts Catholic teaching is beyond the pale and not to be accepted. Any thing can be tolerated except religion or religious orthodoxy.
 
I’ve come to the conclusion he’s a youngish college grad with little real world experience or strong conviction and likes giving off the air of being a centrist of sorts.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top