G
George720
Guest
I think this is a good start - eg hereditary vs non-hereditary…The priesthood of Melchizedek differs from that of Aaron and the Levites in that is not hereditary.
I think the difference can be understood more specifically:
Man-appointed vs God-appointed…
And the problems arise when we find God-appointed parish Priests and merely man-appointed Bishops…
The Church educates and appoints young priests called to the priesthood… Of these, some emerge as highly God-directed across time, and these are made Bishops… That is the way it should happen - And we all know that it often does not work out that way…
Yet I still see the parish priest as the Christian form of the Levite, and the Bishop as the Christian form of the Melchizedek Priesthood - For the Priest serves for the Bishop… The Priest serves his Bishop, and his Bishop, matured in the Faith, serves under his Archbishop and Patriarch, but does so directed by God… As all Bishops have this kind of “equality” before God, though not administratively… And all this “ideally”, and occasionally even happening in the persons of the actual offices…
There is a sense in which Christianity is a kind of “legitimate heresy” of the Jewish Temple Faith… We have Christian “correlates” of the Jewish Feasts and it’s Priesthood… The fact that the Levitical Priesthood no longer exists does not rule out that it has its Christian counterpart, which does exist, and may be understood as its eternal extension…
geo
Last edited: