Congratulations, you’ve recognized what’s so troubling about maintaining that one comes to a belief in the validity of Catholicism through a reasoned evaluation of its supporting documentation. Others, equally rational and equally sincere may come to a completely different conclusion.
And, all that means is that at least one is objectively wrong.
And yet they’re doomed to spend eternity in hell, not because of the character of their actions, but simply because what was apparent to you, wasn’t apparent to them.
No. By asserting this, you are revealing your lack of understanding of Catholic doctrine. Now, don’t get me wrong: there
are Protestant denominations who
do believe what you’ve just asserted. However, the Catholic Church doesn’t assert this. So, I’m not going to argue for a point that non-Catholics make, when Catholics make the opposite argument.
In fact, here’s what the Church teaches:
a person who does not know, and is not reasonably expected to have known, the truths of the faith, can nevertheless attain to heaven. The technical term is ‘invincible ignorance’ – in other words, a lack of knowledge that is not held against a person.
So, it is not the case that a person of good will, who in good faith does not come to an understanding and belief in God, is necessarily condemned for that lack of faith.
Now that we’ve disposed of
that red herring, perhaps the discussion can continue…
![Winking face :wink: 😉](https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png)