I had the opportunity of going to different pilgrimage Churches in Europe, and I lived in Seville, Spain for a year. Here are my observations…
Spain - They stand a lot, even during the consecration, and their masses are very short, with hardly any singing. They still do traditional gestures that were done pre VII. The priest normally enters from the side, not from the back.
Italy - The ones in St. Peters were of course orthodox. The priest celebrated ad orientem. Oddly enough, almost all of my masses there were in another language (filipino, German, etc.!)
Switzerland - Very similar to our own orthodox Churches. They stand and sit at the same time (In Spain, they stand at different times, like after the Mystery of Faith). They sang a lot too (by the way, this was at Eisedeln and Locarno, two of the biggest pilgrimage sites in Switzerland).
France - The mass at Lesiuex was, in my opinion, a bit liberal. But it wasn’t scandalously so. However, the one at the Monastary of Solesmes (a popular gregorian chant abbey) they had all of their masses in latin and were extremely orthodox (it was awesome). And the one at Chartes Cathedral was orthodox as well.
The pilgrimage site for the Brown Scapular in Ayelsford, England was very liberal. They sat a lot, including the Prayers of the faithful, and during the Liturgy of the hours, they didn’t even stand for the Magnificat or the Our Father. But they sang often, which was nice.
Portugal - The mass at the Fatima Basilica was beautiful, from the music, to it’s orthodoxy. However, they also stand at different times like Spain does.