D
DelsonJacobs
Guest
A blog that recommends Bible translations for Catholics has been presenting a new paraphrase called The Message: Catholic/Ecumenical Edition in several of its articles.
The publishers are not Catholic, and when asked if they would be seeking proper ecclesiastical approval they stated it was not necessary for their version, saying:
The Catholic/Ecumenical Edition is meant for use by anyone who values the deuterocanonical writings as either an integral part of the Bible or additional sacred texts worthy of reading and discussion. As such, The Message: Catholic/Ecumenical Edition is not intended to be an “official” Bible of the Catholic Church for use at Mass or for formal catechetics. It was therefore not necessary or even appropriate for us to seek USCCB approval or an imprimatur from a specific bishop. The Message: Catholic/Ecumenical Edition is not a publication of the Catholic Church but an aid to seekers and believers alike in understanding and appreciating the Bible published by an independent, for-profit publishing house that specializes in books for the Catholic/Christian market.
The owner of the blog where this information is being presented seems to agree with the publisher that no such approval is necessary. My understanding is that regardless whether or not a translation is a product of formal equivalence, dynamic equivalence, or paraphrase approaches, the end result must still receive ecclesiastical approval if it is to be offered to the Catholic public as suitable for use in private study, reading, and prayer.
Am I incorrect or should something be done about this to correct this misunderstanding and how? I hope I am misunderstanding something as this is a great blog.
The publishers are not Catholic, and when asked if they would be seeking proper ecclesiastical approval they stated it was not necessary for their version, saying:
The Catholic/Ecumenical Edition is meant for use by anyone who values the deuterocanonical writings as either an integral part of the Bible or additional sacred texts worthy of reading and discussion. As such, The Message: Catholic/Ecumenical Edition is not intended to be an “official” Bible of the Catholic Church for use at Mass or for formal catechetics. It was therefore not necessary or even appropriate for us to seek USCCB approval or an imprimatur from a specific bishop. The Message: Catholic/Ecumenical Edition is not a publication of the Catholic Church but an aid to seekers and believers alike in understanding and appreciating the Bible published by an independent, for-profit publishing house that specializes in books for the Catholic/Christian market.
The owner of the blog where this information is being presented seems to agree with the publisher that no such approval is necessary. My understanding is that regardless whether or not a translation is a product of formal equivalence, dynamic equivalence, or paraphrase approaches, the end result must still receive ecclesiastical approval if it is to be offered to the Catholic public as suitable for use in private study, reading, and prayer.
Am I incorrect or should something be done about this to correct this misunderstanding and how? I hope I am misunderstanding something as this is a great blog.