O
Ontheway
Guest
This is quite sufficient. Thank you. Was this press release not reported on in the local media? What kind of coverage did it receive?
Non-mainstream media? Could you cite a couple of sources?They were covered by the non-mainstream US media. And are pretty easy to locate coverage of if you look beyond ABC, CNN, Fox, etc…
I think what people want, ultimately, is the TRUTH, the whole truth and nothing but the truth. In particular when there seems to be a great disconnect between what people say or promote and what they do.Which leads me to a simple question: if Condemnations aren’t enough… just what are people looking for…?
How about a complete and honest explication of what Muslims really want from others in terms which adequately and fully resolve the conflict between their personal religious commitments to Islam (i.e., a complete depiction of what they believe and why they do) with what the implications of those beliefs are regarding those who do not share their beliefs and how those others are to be treated?What is it that people are looking for from our Muslim neighbors in light of the current troubles?
kurzman.unc.edu/islamic-statements-against-terrorism/Non-mainstream media? Could you cite a couple of sources?
The post above you.This is lovely, but there is not a single word about the evil of Islamist attacks. There is not one word about the Islamic community rejecting the ISIS fighters and their actions.
PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE.
Show me one quote from a Muslim leader telling the Islamist fighters that their actions are against the teachings of the Koran and they contradict Mohamed’s teaching.
Just one who will tell the Islamists that their actions are in violation of the Koran.
And Saudi Arabia is a radical Islamic country. They are not representative of most Muslim majority nations or people.These are fair points.
However, they seem to miss the point that at least one source of the problem appears to be endemic within Islam itself.
The leader of ISIS has a PhD in Islamic theology from the University of Baghdad. Many who promote Hamas, the Muslim Brotherhood and similar radical groups have similar qualifications. Several leading Islamic clerics have been banned recently from European countries and Great Britain for giving incendiary sermons, including Mohamad al-Arefe a university professor from Kind Saud University in Saudi Arabia who also happens to be the imam in the academy mosque of the Saudi navy.
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mohamad_al-Arefe
Not quite. We are all against violence and hate speech and in favor of love and peace.The post above you.
![]()
But, they fund the construction of many if not most of the mosques in the west, and they supply the imams who spread their extreme version of Islam (Wahhabi) in our communities.And Saudi Arabia is a radical Islamic country. They are not representative of most Muslim majority nations or people.
Do you have Proof of your claims? Specifically that they’re supplying the money for most mosques and imams?But, they fund the construction of many if not most of the mosques in the west, and they supply the imams who spread their extreme version of Islam (Wahhabi) in our communities.
They may not represent all Sunni Muslims, but they finance and train many in the west. And they control Mecca. They exercise great influence and have the money to finance many of the educational institutions in the west.
Saudi Arabia is not just one Islamic country. It wield power and influence.
=TheAtheist;13458809]Given the events of the past few weeks, i’ve been noticing a rise in an often familiar comment:
“Why aren’t the moderate Muslims condemning what happened in Paris?”
Most of Muslims condemn what happened in Paris and all Muslims condemn the persecutions in wheresoever. I think Muslims who ignore what happened in Paris have such thoughts that everyday hundreds of Muslims die in Syria or in somevhere else. But western countries or others do not ignore that and treat issue as political or economical benefits but non treat problem as humanely. And also most of western countires do not intend to take refugees and many of them die in sea etc. Israel persecute Muslims and western countries ignore…
I agree with that very of Muslims do not do what Islam says. Islam say be honest and do not lie but many people(Muslims, ofcourse they are humanbeing with weak disposition) do and deceive. Islam say be merciful even for animals and plants too but some people(Muslims…) persecute.I think what people want, ultimately, is the TRUTH, the whole truth and nothing but the truth. In particular when there seems to be a great disconnect between what people say or promote and what they do.
Could you point one of unmoderate word of Prophet Muhammad? Muhammad was taught by God who can see all times.In terms of Islam, there is a radical disconnect between the teachings and actions of Muhammad and the “moderate” views purportedly held by “most Muslims.” The logical question that arises from that disconnect is: “Why do moderates consider themselves “believers” in the words of the Prophet when his words and deeds are clearly not moderate?”
You are right. The problem seems to be caused from Islam itself but in fact that is not so and Muslims failure to explain or others do not intend to understand. And some Muslims failure to implement Islam correctly. But the world is not perfectly and people are in exam to do rigt or wrong. Although they are many who do wrong but they are very many who do right.Ultimately, what “people are looking for” is a reconciliation of the cognitive dissonance between what is said and what is done in such a way as the existence of the apparent discord itself is properly explained. That hasn’t happened. You can’t blame the thick-headedness of people outside of Islam for that dissonance, when the problem clearly derives from inside of Islam and the failure of Muslims to properly explain why the problems aren’t inherent in and integral to the Islamic belief system.
Muslims believe that the Islam is the unique uncorrupted religion of God. Muslims want all people understand that to have salvation. And that is because of why they are so keen in religion. Muslims have many proofs for that.How about a complete and honest explication of what Muslims really want from others in terms which adequately and fully resolve the conflict between their personal religious commitments to Islam (i.e., a complete depiction of what they believe and why they do) with what the implications of those beliefs are regarding those who do not share their beliefs and how those others are to be treated?
For instance Ottoman state governed for centuries and there have been and there are allways Churchs and Christians. Ofcourse there have been/are compulsion on non-Muslims but Muslims never impose others to be Islam because if someone get be Islam forcibly indeed he is not Muslim but Munafik and Islam do not want people to be Munafik.It is fine to CLAIM that such things as constitutional governments. tolerance of other religions and freedom of thought are going to be respected with regard to those not holding to Muslim beliefs, but it is an entirely different thing to read the core teachings of Islam and see that such things are not integral to and, in fact, completely foreign to the religion; nor are these things respected in practice when Islam reaches some level of dominance or influence within a country.
When western countries conquered Istanbul in earlier 19. centure they asked Muslims 6 questions to be answered. By that they intended to humiliate Islam and show that as if there is some lack in Islam. And they did that when they got power over Muslims.The explanations for this disconnect have been largely unsatisfactory since they are couched in tentative language that is largely conditional upon how firm a grip Islam has on the political and religious lives of those affected or on the audience hearing the “account” which purports to be an explanation – i.e., when the grip of Islam is tenuous the language is moderated, but when the grip is firm the language and imposition becomes unyielding. That cannot just be explained away as an inconsequential or accidental feature when it has been a core feature, historically speaking, and continues to be in the modern world.
Jesus was not atonement for our sins but was the way to be forgived. We can be forgived for our sins if we repent. Jesus showed the way.Christianity is indeed complex in regards to the understanding of God.
But the message of Christ, besides affirming He is truly the face of the God, the Heavenly Father, and calling us to lay down our life for our neighbor, and restoring us to the Father, Christ is saying we are truly meant to be family to each other.
You go back to the beginning of mankind…it is Adam and Eve…our names…but the reality that the foundation of human beings is family.
Christ is the atonement for sin…the fulfillment of the ancient sacrifice on the altar of the Jewish Temple in Jerusalem for our sins. We can do nothing of ourselves to atone for our sins before God.
Only God Himself can atone for sin. And He gave us His Son. The precursor first came through Abraham obeying God to sacrifice his own son. He was stopped by Angel Gabriel to sacrifice the ram instead.
Truth is consistent. It doesn’t change.
God does not reveal Himself and then after so many hundreds of years, contradict Himself.
God can do anything and be always constant. He created the Natural Law and He Himself fulfills it. And Christ IS, He is One with the Father, but became carnated through the Blessed Mother and Holy Spirit.
Christ restored us back to the Heavenly Father, He restored us to become our true selves, and to restore love and life with our neighbor.
Christ restores us and all of creation back to God. On the Cross, it was written, all rises up to Him. He broke the power over sin and death.
Christ is the Eternal Word through which this world was created. I thought there are a few lines in the Quoran that say the same truth. Is that true, Hasantas?
Have you gone to New Age Islam…www.newageislam.com? They are working on the concerns you have for Islam.