E
eliasaph99
Guest
OK.I’m not sure which Vedas this quote is taken from, I am basing this on the following article by Stephen Knapp.
Source: Christianity and the Vedic teachings within itCode:At the beginning of the book of John in the New Testament, it states, “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.” This is actually a verbatim translation of the Vedic Sanskrit mantra: “Prajapatirvai idamagraasit, tasya vag dvitiyaa asit, vag vai paramam Brahma.”
The similarities between these two quotes are too close to possibly disregard and far from the Gospel having influenced the writing of the Vedas, we know that the Vedas are among the most ancient of all world Scriptures. Clearly, these words found their way from the Vedas of India into the Gospel ‘according to’ John. Many will ask, or rather they should ask, how can this be if the New Testament is the Word of God, written by Divine Inspiration?
I looked at your source and he doesn’t cite any source either. He just makes a claim. I did not find this quote in the written Vedic manuscripts, so I assume that it is an oral chant. Oral chants cannot be sourced or dated without some form of written record. It is entirely possible that the information flow you’re implying was in the opposite direction.
Also, you appear to have changed your source from your first citation to your second.
In the first, you have a sentence by sentence breakdown, but in the second, you quote a paragraph. Unless, perhaps, you read sanskrit and were able to make this breakdown for us.
I looked at the website of the author and read some of the claims in the work that your citation is from. I have to say that I am not inclined to qualify this person as a credible source.
Among some other fruitcakey things, he is trying to claim on his website that the Taj Mahal was not built when it was and that there is a worldwide conspiracy to obscure that it is, in reality, a Vedic temple built hundreds of years earlier and not the mausoleum of a beloved wife.
The author that you are citing is trying to draw likenesses between vague and sometimes unlike events. Like this:
Comparisons like this are simply not credible. Using this kind of logic, I could show that Islam and Mayan religions are actually identical and that in reality, the Islamic god is Quetzlcoatl.At the time when Krishna left this planet, His foot was pierced with an arrow, while Jesus’ side was pierced with a spear.