W
Wulfgar
Guest
I have no idea why I am asking anonymous people on the internet this question. Now that I am on break I am less stressed out and more aware of these sorts of things, and this forum seems to be the only place I can go to for answers. But I digress.
I am so upset and paralyzed about the saints who basically almost unanimously declare that most go to hell. Doesn’t that imply predestination? Doesn’t that imply despair, that the fate of the majority of mankind has already been sealed? I mean, come on… it makes me less inclined to do things, but I know this can’t be the right attitude. Why even tell us? Why? Does the fact that few rather than many being saved actually “mean” anything, only that God wins both ways (regardless of number saved)?
Some people say that this idea should make one a saint, and make one more likely to work out their salvation “with fear and trembling”, and therefore be saved. Unfortunately, such statements as these only further leads me to continuously (unconsciously) judge each and every single person I meet: Will they make it to heaven? What are their vices? What sorts of sins have they committed?
I simply don’t understand how a God, who designed such an awe-inspiring universe, who gave His only Son in a heroic, completely selfless act of love - who in His omnipotence works at His fullest capacity to save mankind - would be unable to save the majority of people. Yes I understand the teaching that free will necessitates the existence of hell, but come on… most people go there?
…why would they choose that? What does that mean, that most people are damned? Creation, theologically speaking, is good, but why doesn’t that imply that it was a mistake for God to create? From my understanding, he didn’t have to… so, if this were the case, why?
Oh, and also, if the number of the damned - or, at least, the general proportionality (i.e., many vs. few) - has already been determined, then does that mean that specific people’s eternal destinies have already been determined? If the number is already set in stone… why not the individuals as well?
The idea of living life in so much fear and depression and anxiety… how exactly is that “love”? That it still requires so much effort to get to heaven? Did God mandate that effort? Is there any particular reason why it is difficult, rather than easy?
In summary, I don’t see how the saints’ unanimous declaration of the majority of people being damned helps. It just makes me see more people as ever more sinful. Now, every time I approach someone who seems light-hearted and happy, I cannot help but “judge” (not in the sinful sense, more like “intuition/reaction”) that they are a very bad person on the road to hell. I can already hear the traditionalists responding: Yes, yes, it is true indeed: we are all extremely bad and the majority are going to hell.
If the saints (almost) unanimously declared the majority of persons in hell, then why doesn’t the Church officially declare this? Why doesn’t scripture (clearly) declare it, as it is such a crucial notion? Sure, you can point me to the passages on the narrow way, etc. but why isn’t there an explicit statement that most go to hell? And, by the way, why did Jesus sound slightly apathetic when talking about the narrow way, if he meant that most go to hell? He just… declared it. No mourning, nothing. Why?
Don’t worry about answering each and every one of my random inquiries. I am simply spilling a bunch of thoughts out, and although I have been praying daily, I am just getting back into focusing better now that I am on break for a bit. I am beginning to trust fewer and fewer people… but I have no idea why I am trusting anonymous persons on the internet over real, flesh-and-blood people. I don’t know why my gut instinct is that the internet people are more trustworthy than the ones I actually speak with.
One last thought: if the traditionalists are right - that most go to hell - and taking into account the fact that traditionalists comprise a small portion of the Catholic Church (correct me if I’m wrong), then you cannot use the argument in defense of Catholicism that it has the most adherents (at least, I personally don’t find it compelling or consistent). Stay consistent, please, if the traditionalists are “right” and everyone else is “wrong”.
I am so upset and paralyzed about the saints who basically almost unanimously declare that most go to hell. Doesn’t that imply predestination? Doesn’t that imply despair, that the fate of the majority of mankind has already been sealed? I mean, come on… it makes me less inclined to do things, but I know this can’t be the right attitude. Why even tell us? Why? Does the fact that few rather than many being saved actually “mean” anything, only that God wins both ways (regardless of number saved)?
Some people say that this idea should make one a saint, and make one more likely to work out their salvation “with fear and trembling”, and therefore be saved. Unfortunately, such statements as these only further leads me to continuously (unconsciously) judge each and every single person I meet: Will they make it to heaven? What are their vices? What sorts of sins have they committed?
I simply don’t understand how a God, who designed such an awe-inspiring universe, who gave His only Son in a heroic, completely selfless act of love - who in His omnipotence works at His fullest capacity to save mankind - would be unable to save the majority of people. Yes I understand the teaching that free will necessitates the existence of hell, but come on… most people go there?
…why would they choose that? What does that mean, that most people are damned? Creation, theologically speaking, is good, but why doesn’t that imply that it was a mistake for God to create? From my understanding, he didn’t have to… so, if this were the case, why?
Oh, and also, if the number of the damned - or, at least, the general proportionality (i.e., many vs. few) - has already been determined, then does that mean that specific people’s eternal destinies have already been determined? If the number is already set in stone… why not the individuals as well?
The idea of living life in so much fear and depression and anxiety… how exactly is that “love”? That it still requires so much effort to get to heaven? Did God mandate that effort? Is there any particular reason why it is difficult, rather than easy?
In summary, I don’t see how the saints’ unanimous declaration of the majority of people being damned helps. It just makes me see more people as ever more sinful. Now, every time I approach someone who seems light-hearted and happy, I cannot help but “judge” (not in the sinful sense, more like “intuition/reaction”) that they are a very bad person on the road to hell. I can already hear the traditionalists responding: Yes, yes, it is true indeed: we are all extremely bad and the majority are going to hell.
If the saints (almost) unanimously declared the majority of persons in hell, then why doesn’t the Church officially declare this? Why doesn’t scripture (clearly) declare it, as it is such a crucial notion? Sure, you can point me to the passages on the narrow way, etc. but why isn’t there an explicit statement that most go to hell? And, by the way, why did Jesus sound slightly apathetic when talking about the narrow way, if he meant that most go to hell? He just… declared it. No mourning, nothing. Why?
Don’t worry about answering each and every one of my random inquiries. I am simply spilling a bunch of thoughts out, and although I have been praying daily, I am just getting back into focusing better now that I am on break for a bit. I am beginning to trust fewer and fewer people… but I have no idea why I am trusting anonymous persons on the internet over real, flesh-and-blood people. I don’t know why my gut instinct is that the internet people are more trustworthy than the ones I actually speak with.
One last thought: if the traditionalists are right - that most go to hell - and taking into account the fact that traditionalists comprise a small portion of the Catholic Church (correct me if I’m wrong), then you cannot use the argument in defense of Catholicism that it has the most adherents (at least, I personally don’t find it compelling or consistent). Stay consistent, please, if the traditionalists are “right” and everyone else is “wrong”.