The Orwellian Sexual Revolution

  • Thread starter Thread starter JimG
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I don’t agree with the sexual revolution, but it was likely spurred on by real problems and inequalities that needed to be addressed. Unfortunately, those things did not end up addressed in an ethical way.
 
I work for my local school board, lol! Fortunately they’ve resisted Newspeak. So far.
 
There were no problems only desires. Certain groups of people wanted society changed to get people unlike them to accept fornication. Nothing ‘needed to be addressed’ for the average person.
 
Check the school library list for gay story books for kindergarten.
 
“Oh that book is missing? Huh. What a shame!”
🤣🤣🤣
 
Last edited:
Why should anyone have to be learn them?
I address kids as “boys and girls” all the time.
There are only two genders. Period. Anything else is delusional nonsense
And yet even the meaning of 'girl 'has changed over time -look it up,.

At one point both males and females could be referred to as ‘girl’. Your use of it exclusively for females would have been confusing and wrong to a middle ages English speaker. And no doubt there was a point where someone started to use it as you do and was ridiculed by more old-school types, as you do.

Language - including its gendering- - is a continually evolving and changing thing. And amen to that, who wants a language that is incapable of expressing new ideas?
 
Last edited:
Fake words are used to promote an agenda. Some new ideas are bad to very bad.
 
Fake words are used to promote an agenda. Some new ideas are bad to very bad.
'Fake words? Or simply new words coined to express new ideas- like ‘Christian’ was in the early days of our faith.

If an idea is bad is censoring it or blaming its language going to help? Did outlawing heresy and banning heretical books keep everyone happily Catholic? It didn’t.
 
The left loves to criticize “fake news” and hold themselves up as the vanguard of truth, but their entire worldview is made up and forced upon the masses.
 
Yes, we’re not talking about harmless changes here. The words being made up now are intended to sow total confusion about gender-- as if there are far more than two.
I’m not talking about some conspiracy per se, either. There is one person who is ultimately responsible for this.
Hint: he’s not a human being.
 
Last edited:
Yes, we’re not talking about harmless changes here. The words being made up now are intended to sow total confusion about gender-- as if there are far more than two.
I’m not talking about some conspiracy per se, either. There is one person who is ultimately responsible for this.
Hint: he’s not a human being.
It is a direct attack on the truths revealed in the opening pages of Sacred Scripture. If Satan can undermine the most basic biological truth known across all cultures for centuries, then anything else is up for grabs - there is no ultimate truth. And this particular evil is masquerading as tolerance, acceptance, being open minded, you name it. If you deny that a trans person is actually their birth sex well, you are a hateful intolerant bigot (and Jesus wouldn’t do that! cry those driving this agenda), so scream the enablers and champions of this horrible lie.
 
Last edited:
This will all be pushed in the Catholic Church as well. There are already enough sympathizers within the Church. Satan can’t wait until the Church schisms. I believe that’s inevitable now. 😥
 
The fact that Fr. James Martin and the Lexington Bishop go officially uncorrected should be a great warning.
 
Very telling and the longer the leash, the bolder they get.
What am I saying? There seems to be no leash at all. Free rein.
 
That is the truth. When people believe there is no one higher than themselves, they will tend toward corrupted thinking. They may sound a little reasonable, but that quickly proves to be not the case.

Deception is the devil’s primary weapon.
 
The world and living my way. I am in charge, not God. And this is what happens.
 
That’s not going to happen. Pope Francis knows about the “ideological colonizations.”
 
I hope not, while fearing it must. Most likely under Pope Francis’ successor.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top