The Perfect Joy of St. Francis

  • Thread starter Thread starter TrueLight
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
T

TrueLight

Guest
Br. JR,

I want to thank you for recommending “The Perfect Joy of Saint Francis”. O got it today and I am already more than halfway through it. It puts so much into perspective for me, in terms of what is important and what is not and what it means for your focus to be on serving Christ. And what it means for him to be your all and all.

One of the things St Francis said:
Above all the graces and gifts of the Holy Spirit which Christ gives to His friends is that of conquering oneself and willingly enduring sufferings, insults, humiliations, and hardships for the love of Christ. For we cannot glory in all those other marvelous gifts of God, as they are not ours but God’s, as the Apostle says: ‘What have you that you have not received?’
“But we can glory in the cross of tribulations and afflictions, because that is ours, and so the Apostle says: ‘I will not glory save the Cross of our Lord Jesus Christ!’”
What a different perspective of life.
 
I received some PMs asking for this subject. The lives of the saints is a legitimate part of Catholic Tradition. Let’s see how this goes. 👍
 
Br. JR,

I want to thank you for recommending “The Perfect Joy of Saint Francis”. O got it today and I am already more than halfway through it. It puts so much into perspective for me, in terms of what is important and what is not and what it means for your focus to be on serving Christ. And what it means for him to be your all and all.

One of the things St Francis said:

What a different perspective of life.
I said it somewhere else. This book changed my life. I was in 5th grade when I first read it. I was a Jewish boy. I fell in love with Francis of Assisi. From there, I read everything I could find on him. By the time I was in 10th grade, I was Catholic.

As a non-Christian, I was able to understand why the Church has called Francis of Assisi:
  • The Mirror of Perfection
  • The Alter Christus
  • The Perfect Christian
  • The Perfect Catholic
  • The Seraphic Father
  • The Icon of Christ
Pope Benedict gave him the last title, The Icon of Christ. If we lost the Gospels, we would be able to reconstruct the image of Christ by looking at Francis’ life and teachings.
Above all the graces and gifts of the Holy Spirit which Christ gives to His friends is that of conquering oneself and willingly enduring sufferings, insults, humiliations, and hardships for the love of Christ.
This has always been an essential part of the Franciscan Spiritual School. Francis taught us that part of conquering ourselves was learning to put up with the difficulties of life. He was very practical. He understood that life is a journey and that perfection is something toward which we strive, but we never achieve it here.

He also understood and taught that even though the world was going to heck in a hand basket, the man of faith did not despair or panic. On the contrary, he grabs on to the Lord, who is his God and his all. He prays, detaches from the issues around him and converts the world by conquering himself first. The sins and failings of the world become the object of his life of prayer and penance, rather than the object of rejection.

Francis lived in a world and a Church very similar to our own. However, his reaction to it was much more like that of Christ than is our reaction. Francis looks at Christ and realizes that Jesus never set out to do battle with the Jewish and Roman leadership of his time. They went looking for him. Jesus set out to preach the Gospel to whomever would listen. Francis sets out to teach the Gospel to whomever would listen. It was that simple. 🙂

He was tempted to try to convert the world, but Clare sets him straight on that. 😃 He accepted that the world would be converted only when we detached from it. Each person, one at a time, detaches from the world around him. This is how we begin to conquer ourselves. Before we realize it, the world is converted.

Francis sets out to teach detachment. This is what he’s saying here. In his admonitions, he wrote the sequel to this statement. He said that you had to be willing to suffer with Christ, because suffering is the only thing that we can truly own. The cross is meant for man. Unless we follow Christ to the cross, we cannot reach the Father.

Instead of complaining about the world, the family, the Church or the nation, etc, you change yourself. You place your trust in God’s hands and the Church. The only thing to which we have a right is to the cross.

Francis leads others to the cross. He refrains from the finger pointing. He did not tolerate finger pointers gladly. That’s because, he has a very different perspective of life. His perspective of life is that of Christ who looks down at the world from the cross, sees its sinfulness, but also sees its innocence. With Christ, Francis says, “Forgive them . . . they know not what they do.” He makes Christ’s passion and words his own.

You’re right. He’s worldview is incredible. He looks at the world through the eyes of the Master.

Fraternally,

Br. JR, OSF 🙂
 
Someone has to start a Vitae Fratres fanclub here… 😉

I can’t believe what brainwashing is going on in the name of the Seraphic Father! Let’s pan out the evil grey and brown influences with some black and white! 😃

All-and-all, though, St. Francis wasn’t a bad guy I guess.

Lives of the Brethren, *CHAPTER. XXV

DOMINIC’S STUDIES IN THE BOOK OF CHARITY

A PRIEST after hearing him preach right eloquently and talk most learnedly upon the sacred Scriptures, made bold to ask him what books he studied most. The man of God gave him this answer, that he studied more in the book of charity than in any other: and this choice of his was most wisely made, for it is indeed an all-instructive book.*

Both of these Holy Fathers of Mendicancy were so big on Charity. It is the greatest virtue, the one truly and most highly preached by Christ on the Cross, merely by being on the Cross! Divine Love shatters everything. I think reading the sayings of both D. and F. show a great balancing-out, or similarity of strength and love. They’re like two children on a seesaw/teeter-totter, and God is the fulcrum. 👍
 
I received some PMs asking for this subject. The lives of the saints is a legitimate part of Catholic Tradition. Let’s see how this goes. 👍
This book is so awesome, that I couldn’t even put it down. I fell asleep reading it.
. I think reading the sayings of both D. and F. show a great balancing-out, or similarity of strength and love. They’re like two children on a seesaw/teeter-totter, and God is the fulcrum. 👍
I didn’t know anything about the Saints. Saint Dominic is actually introduced in this book along with St Clare. So you can bet after reading this book, I’m moving onto those two. 🙂
 
As a non-Christian, I was able to understand why the Church has called Francis of Assisi:
  • The Mirror of Perfection
  • The Alter Christus
  • The Perfect Christian
  • The Perfect Catholic
  • The Seraphic Father
  • The Icon of Christ
Br. JR, OSF 🙂
You’ve said this many times and I never understood why.
– He trusted God for all his needs
– He lived his life to preach the Gospel
– He was extremely humble. Not the false humility, that we are used to. A perfect example in the book is when one day while praying and marveling at the beauty around him, he weeps and says “Oh Lord, I am ashamed that you use a worm like me as a channel through which you pour forth your love over humanity.” And he meant it.
– He did not like people treating him like a Saint. In fact, he avoided St Clare because she would venerate him when she saw him.

Awesome man.
 
After reading how St Francis and his brothers went out everyday to beg for food. I will never look at someone who is begging on the train in the same light again.

I tend to feel that there are social agencies set in place and pantries and no on needs to beg. In fact, pandering is illegal on the trains. I also tend to feel that most of the beggars are alcoholics and drug addicts. And maybe they are. But who am I to make that judgement? Alcoholics and drug addicts need to eat to. Maybe some of them wake up and ask God what they are going to eat today. And maybe God can use me for his purposes.

Br. JR, I do have one question about the book. Why the focus on begging? Sure, Jesus didn’t work as a carpenter once he started his ministry, but he didn’t begging for food did he?

How has the idea of begging for food changed over the centuries among the Franciscans? I know brothers take a vow of poverty.
 
Someone has to start a Vitae Fratres fanclub here… 😉

I can’t believe what brainwashing is going on in the name of the Seraphic Father! Let’s pan out the evil grey and brown influences with some black and white! 😃

All-and-all, though, St. Francis wasn’t a bad guy I guess.

Lives of the Brethren, *CHAPTER. XXV

DOMINIC’S STUDIES IN THE BOOK OF CHARITY

A PRIEST after hearing him preach right eloquently and talk most learnedly upon the sacred Scriptures, made bold to ask him what books he studied most. The man of God gave him this answer, that he studied more in the book of charity than in any other: and this choice of his was most wisely made, for it is indeed an all-instructive book.*

Both of these Holy Fathers of Mendicancy were so big on Charity. It is the greatest virtue, the one truly and most highly preached by Christ on the Cross, merely by being on the Cross! Divine Love shatters everything. I think reading the sayings of both D. and F. show a great balancing-out, or similarity of strength and love. They’re like two children on a seesaw/teeter-totter, and God is the fulcrum. 👍
I say that if we want to discuss Dominic, we ask for another thread. Dominic is a wonderful saint, but even though Francis and Dominic are thrown together as the “Fathers of Mendicancy”, the truth is that they are not. Nor are they as similar as people believe.

The connection between them is through their sons, Bonaventure and Aquinas. Both were professors are Parish and they were working on the Summa when the Franciscan ordered Bonaventure to drop the project, drop the University and become the General Minister of the order. Thomas finished the Summa alone. However, the great friendship between them continued until their deaths just a few months apart.

Francis and Dominic actually did meet. Apparently, they liked each other very much. It was the hope of the hierarchy that the two would merge their fraternities. However, there were several reasons why this was impossible and these reasons help us understand the differences between the two men.

Dominic had founded an order of nuns to pray for preachers, but he kept very tight controls over them. Francis believed that males should have no authority over females. He prohibits the friars from even entering the convents of nuns, much less exercising any authority over them. He had founded the Poor Clares, given Clare a rule of life and then told her to change it as she saw fit. Clare actually did rewrite it. She did not make major changes to it. She added rules about the enclosure and she took out the requirement for a habit. She did not require a habit of her nuns. She and Francis considered this a monastic custom and Christ was not calling them to live according to the monastic tradition.

Dominic embraced the monastic tradition. His friars prayed the Divine Office in choir, used Gregorian Chant. Francis wanted nothing to do with choirs or with Gregorian chant. He wanted his brothers to pray where ever they found themselves. They were never to have choirs. The reason was simple. While Dominic had visions of an order, Francis had visions of a brotherhood or family where all would be equal. In the monastic tradition, the priests prayed the office in choir. The other monks (non ordained) prayed separately. This had not been Benedict’s idea. This was a distortion of Benedictine life that crept into the monastic tradition with clericalism. However, Dominic wanted to preserve this, because he wanted his friars to contemplate and then preach. Francis wanted his brothers also to contemplate and preach, but he did not want them to be structured. Francis took his clues from the Acts of the Apostles. He saw how the Apostles were all in communion with Peter, but each was also independent. In his mind, the apostolic life was to live as the Apostles lived. They would come together united by a central father, that was him, but they were free to take his rule and with his blessing, they were to go and live the rule as God inspired them, just as the Apostles took the Gospel and ran with it in different directions.

There was another major difference between the two men. Dominic wanted an order of priests with laymen who would be coadjutor brothers. In effect, they would be two distinct vocations, the Dominican Priest and the Dominican Brother. The brother supported the work of the priest by running the house, doing the manual labor, caring for their chapels and providing for the material needs of the community, the priests would do the studying and the preaching.
 
Francis was very sure that through Divine Revelation he had clearly heard Christ calling him to have one brotherhood of equals. Everyone who followed him would embrace the cross. But there were starting points. First, you had to embrace brotherhood. When you arrived, you had to become one with these other men. They had to welcome you and make you feel at home. There were to be no barriers or differences. Any differences were to be eliminated and blurred as much as possible. The first priests, were not ordained by the order. They came ordained.

The first thing that they had to do was drop the title, Father and trade in their clerical dress for the clothes of the beggar.

The second thing that they had to do was to vow obedience to Francis, who was a layman and to his successors, be they lay or ordained. Dominic could not accept this. In Dominic’s way of life, the priests had to govern. If the two founders had merged, Dominic would have been the superior and Francis his subordinate. That would have extinguished the Holy Spirit’s plans, because Francis would have become a Coadjutor Dominican Brother, instead of Father Francis, not Father as in priest, but as in Patriarch.

Then there was the issue of ordaining. Dominic needed to ordain men for the mission of preaching. Francis liked having a few priests to celebrate mass for the fraternity. However, he did not want to limit his order to priests. He did not see the need for priests in order to live the cross. There would always be priests to whom they could go for confession and for mass. They did. They would often walk for miles to go to confession or to go to mass.

If they had had priests in positions of leadership, the priests would have also taken over the liturgical life of the fraternity. Francis saw the mass as the sacrifice of the community and as a meal between brothers. Vatican II actually borrowed language from the Franciscan tradition. Francis had borrowed it from the early Church. In his mind, the brother priest was at the service of his brothers. He led his brothers in offering the sacrifice and like Christ; he set the table for his brothers. He was not above his brothers; he was their servant. Just as Christ washed the feet of the Apostles, the priest was to serve his brothers by celebrating the Holy Mass and hearing their confessions. Once the celebration of the sacraments was over, the brother was just a brother. He would go back to his work.

Had they had priests in positions of leadership, as did the Dominicans, the priests would have taken over the Divine Office. It would have been a priest leading it. Francis had a vision in which Christ had shown him the brothers as one body. In this vision, he could not tell them apart. He went to the scriptures and studied St. Paul’s lesson on the body. He realized that though the body has many organs, as Paul says and the hand cannot say to the eye that it does not need it, Francis added something to that teaching. He would often say, that there are many organs, but when you look, all you see is the man. His brothers and sisters were like the body. There were many organs: priests, scholars, farmers, lawyers, artisan, cooks, preachers, etc, but when one looked at the Franciscan body, one should see the man, Jesus Christ.

The other difference between Dominic and Francis was the question of the heretics and Muslims. Dominic was prepared to take his brothers to combat heresy through reason. Francis was prepared to take his brothers to bring the heretics home through love… He had no desire to proselytize to them and he prohibited it. To this day, Franciscans do not try to convert non-Catholics by preaching to them. You bring them home through your example and by corporal works of mercy. That were Br. Leo says of Francis, “he preached often and only when necessary used words.”. This is one reason why may radical traditionalists do not like the Franciscans. The Franciscan family refuses to proselytize. Francis teaches us to bring home our brothers and sisters by leading them home with our example and our works of mercy, especially toward the poorest of the poor. Mother Teresa grasped this. She made us of Francis’ rule of life in drafting her statutes for her congregation.

Dominic wanted to follow the Rule of St. Augustine. When asked, Francis replied that the Lord had shown him what to do and no man had intervened. Therefore, he would not give up the rule that he had composed to adopt that of St. Augustine, because just as the Lord had inspired Augustine to write his rule, so had the Lord inspired him (Francis) to write his rule. Dominic could not embrace Francis’ rules, because it was not written with priests in mind, even though there were always priests among the Franciscans, but the mission and life of the Franciscan was not priestly.

Fraternally,

Br. JR, OSF 🙂
 
OK, let me get back to St. Francis. :yup:
You’ve said this many times and I never understood why.
– He trusted God for all his needs
When Francis goes to the Scripture he hears Christ say three things that he takes to hear and these commands become the root of the Franciscan rule.
  • “Take nothing for your journey”
  • “Deny yourself and take up your cross”
  • “Sell what you have and give to the poor”
Jesus is not just dishing out good advice for Francis and his family. Francis asks Father Peter to open the Gospel Book three times in the Name of the Trinity. This is an extremely important detail. Everything that Francis does and teaches is Trinitarian. We live in the presence of the Trinity and we are guided by the Trinity. Therefore, our life, even our prayer, should be an act of honor to the Trinity.

The Holy Spirit speaks to Francis, and tells him that the way to the Father is through the Son. He must put himself at the mercy of God as the Son did.
– He lived his life to preach the Gospel
Yes, and as I said above, the difference between him and Dominic is that Francis method of preaching is a popular method, one that can be adopted by anyone. You don’t have to be a priest or religious to preach the Gospel the way Francis preached it.

He read the Gospel, prayed over the Gospel, asked the Church to confirm his understanding, then he went out and put into practice what the Gospel said. When anyone asked, “Why don’t you get excited, angry, or feel indignation? Can’t you see all of the heresy around us? Can’t you see the abuses by the clergy?” Francis could calmly answer, “Look at the birds of the air and the lilies of the field, no heretic, no cleric, no bishop, can care for us as our Father does. We are in his hands. He will lead us as he led Moses out of Egypt.” He preached without confrontation and without frustration.
– He was extremely humble. Not the false humility that we are used to. A perfect example in the book is when one day while praying and marveling at the beauty around him, he weeps and says “Oh Lord, I am ashamed that you use a worm like me as a channel through which you pour forth your love over humanity.” And he meant it.
Francis paid very close attention to Jesus’ self disclosures. This is very Franciscan Theology. Aquinas did not pay much attention to this. I’m not saying that Aquinas missed something. It’s just that he did not. It’s that simple.

Francis pays attention to Christ’s self disclosures.

I AM the way

I AM the Good Shepherd

I AM the vine

I AM he

Jesus Christ, who is humility incarnate, speaks in simple facts. He speaks of himself in terms of who he is, I AM . . .

Our Holy Father runs with this example. If one is to be humble, one must begin with I AM a sinner. I AM an instrument. I AM [fill in the blank]. One does not inflate what one is, nor does one deny it. One simply accepts it. He would always say, “I am what I am before God, nothing else.” In his mind, no man is more or less than what he is before God. This became another of his mantras that he would hand down to his sons and daughters. We judge actions; we do not judge people. We speak about what people do, we do not speak about what they are before God. Only the individual and God knows what he is. Humility starts with I AM . . ., as Christ spoke and does not make judgments about what others are, because only Christ knows what others are.
– He did not like people treating him like a Saint. In fact, he avoided St Clare because she would venerate him when she saw him.
He had a wonderful relationship with Clare. It was very human. She was in love with his holiness. He was used to flattery. He had been a pretty boy, though he was not a sinner at all. He was charming, friendly, generous, talented and a really nice guy to have around. Clare’s adulation did not help, because it triggered those old feelings of self-awareness, self-importance and pride. There was also another part.

He was young and he had a strong libido. She was young and beautiful. She too had an attractive personality, charming, witty, very intelligent and she was his intellectual superior. She was the woman of his dreams. If he was to be her father, he needed to act like a father. There were boundaries that had to be kept.

Finally, there was the fraternal dimension of this relationship. Clare always referred to herself as Francis’ plant. Allegedly, he was her guide. This part was true. He was the teacher and the Patriarch. However, she did not treat him as a daughter does a father. She treated him as an older sister would treat a son, even though she was 10-years his junior. She would box his ears, which was another reason to stay away.

There was a time when he wanted to go out and do what Dominic was doing. He wanted to convert heretics and Muslims. He left to go on a mission. When he returned, she gave him an earful. She told him that his mission was to convert Catholics to Christianity. She did not like Catholics at all. Which is very interesting. She loved the Catholic Church, but she felt that Catholics seemed to come in two crops, the left and the right. Someone had to bring them to the center, that was Francis.
After reading how St Francis and his brothers went out everyday to beg for food. I will never look at someone who is begging on the train in the same light again.
Mother Teresa read this and this is how she concludes that Christ lives among us in the distressing disguise of the poor.
 
Br. JR, I do have one question about the book. Why the focus on begging? Sure, Jesus didn’t work as a carpenter once he started his ministry, but he didn’t begging for food did he?
If you look at the Acts of the Apostles, you will notice that the early Christians put everything they had at the feet of the Apostles and it was distributed according to need. It was a form of Socialism… While Jesus was with them, the Apostles had different occupations, but they also traveled with him all over the place. Obviously, they were not all working at the same time. They depended on each other. We look at Christ’s birth; there is no room in the house where Mary and Joseph are staying. Jesus is born in a cave. He says of himself, "The Son of Man has no place to lay his head. We see him died naked. He is stripped of everything, including human dignity. Finally, he is laid to rest in a borrowed tomb.

Christ and the Apostles set the example of community life and family life. Everything is for the common good, not the individual good. That rubs against our American grain and we try to overlook that part of the Scripture. Francis, who came from the Middle Class, was very sensitive to this idea of the personal good, less government, less control of personal wealth by the government, which in those days were the royalty and the Church. He is now taking a step backward toward the Apostolic Community.

Biographers often place a lot of emphasis on the begging and ignore not the other part, because it’s not as interesting. In reality, the rule says that everyone must work and those who don’t know how to work should learn. Only when you’re no compensated enough to meet your needs and the needs of the poor, then should “apply to the table of the Lord”, which means that you beg.

Today, we still try to provide for ourselves from our work. We still ask for support when our income is not enough to meet our needs and those of the people around us.

Poverty, is not just a means to an end. In other words, it’s not a way of becoming holy. Poverty is holiness. A man or woman who achieves voluntary poverty is a truly holy man. To be poor, one must detach. One must be willing to give what one has without expecting anything in return. One must give what the Lord takes and accept what he gives.

Franciscans take this so seriously, because Francis mentions it in every piece of writing, that Franciscans have a rule. We avoid contact with the middle class. When we’re serving in a town or neighborhood and it reaches the status of Middle Class, we close the parish and leave. Mother Teresa said it best. The American Middle Class often turns its back on the poor, while it struggles and strives to achieve what the wealthy have instead of turning its back on wealth and place what it has at the service of the poor. Franciscans say, that the Middle Class is very insecure. It has not learned to depend on the Father. Unless the Middle Class depends on the Father, it will suffer constant anxiety about tomorrow. This worrying about tomorrow and wishing to have more of what we want, not what we need, is not the recipe for sanctity. Voluntary poverty is the recipe for holiness. As Mother Teresa said, “live simply so that others may simply live.”

Fraternally,

Br. JR, OSF 🙂
 
Biographers often place a lot of emphasis on the begging and ignore not the other part, because it’s not as interesting. In reality, the rule says that everyone must work and those who don’t know how to work should learn. Only when you’re no compensated enough to meet your needs and the needs of the poor, then should “apply to the table of the Lord”, which means that you beg.

Today, we still try to provide for ourselves from our work. We still ask for support when our income is not enough to meet our needs and those of the people around us.
Emphasis mine. What does that say about striving to be successful in the business world. On the one hand, we need to provide for our families as much as we can. On the other hand, often the bills that we have is based on the luxuries that we commit ourselves to.

This is something I struggle with personally. I am paying heaps of money for cable (DVRs in every room), everyone has smartphones with unlimited data and texting. I tell my kids they are strong and often I want to cut all that stuff out. However, I don’t want to deprive them.

If it were just me, I could live with a lot less, but it is not just me.

How do you guys feel about finding that middle ground?
 
Poverty, is not just a means to an end. In other words, it’s not a way of becoming holy. Poverty is holiness. A man or woman who achieves voluntary poverty is a truly holy man. To be poor, one must detach. One must be willing to give what one has without expecting anything in return. One must give what the Lord takes and accept what he gives.
Can not one argue that living a life of poverty can lead to a form of pride as well? Is this why St Francis did so much penance?

Here is an example:

There are a couple of times in the book when some of the brothers, for a special feast, set a nice table with tablecloth and find silverware. St Francis would come in his tattered clothes and sit on the ground or bring with him his loaf of stale bread.

Doesn’t that in itself tend to be condemning?
 
Emphasis mine. What does that say about striving to be successful in the business world. On the one hand, we need to provide for our families as much as we can. On the other hand, often the bills that we have is based on the luxuries that we commit ourselves to.

This is something I struggle with personally. I am paying heaps of money for cable (DVRs in every room), everyone has smartphones with unlimited data and texting. I tell my kids they are strong and often I want to cut all that stuff out. However, I don’t want to deprive them.

If it were just me, I could live with a lot less, but it is not just me.

How do you guys feel about finding that middle ground?
You’re in a tight spot, because you got your family used to having certain things. Franciscans would say that we have to be careful not to raise children with a sense of entitlement. Francis was raised that way. There were seven Bernadone children. They were raised with more than what they needed. It was their father’s wish to give them more than what he had. It was rather interesting how it came back in his face.

The two oldest were sons, Giovanni and Angelo. Giovanani, as we know, becomes Brother Francis and Angelo steps into his father’s shoes. Francis rejects this world of entitlement. He walks away from it, even though it hurt his father very much. Angelo, moves into the slot vocated by Francis.

Years later, we learn from Brother Giovanni Batista, Francis’ nephew and Angelo’s son, how Angelo had also become a snob and his son walks away and joins his uncles order.

The Franciscan response is to avoid believing that we’re entitled to more than what we need. Avoid teaching our children that they are entitled by giving them more than what they need.

When we receive more than what we need or when we give to our children more than what they need, cultivate a sense of gratitude toward God who has provided a little extra and be generous enough to share the extra with those who have less.

No one should waste the life that God has given them working to pay bills for things that they don’t need. Francis said that those who are caught in that trap need to do penance. The best penance is to begin to say “No” to the things you don’t need so that you can pay those bills and get on with the important things in life: God, pray, family, friends, creativity, productivity, charity, relaxation, and preparation for a good death.

Our Holy Father Francis taught us to live each day with gratitude, not as a burden. When you spend each day working to pay for all those things that you don’t need, do you feel very grateful?

Even the poor man who works two jobs to support his family is happier than the middle class man who works 60 hours to pay for all the stuff that he owns and the expensive vacations. The poor man, works just as long as the middle class man, but in the end he feels that he has met his family’s needs. The middle class man never feels that he has done so, because his family asks for more and more. He’s taught them entitlement.

Entitlement can be dangerous to the soul. This is what Francis finds out. Those who feel entitled don’t own their sins and often feel that they don’t owe God anything. That’s a slippery slope.

The middle ground is working for what you need, being grateful for the extras, and generous with those who have less than you do.

Fraternally,

Br. JR, OSF 🙂
 
Emphasis mine. What does that say about striving to be successful in the business world. On the one hand, we need to provide for our families as much as we can. On the other hand, often the bills that we have is based on the luxuries that we commit ourselves to.

This is something I struggle with personally. I am paying heaps of money for cable (DVRs in every room), everyone has smartphones with unlimited data and texting. I tell my kids they are strong and often I want to cut all that stuff out. However, I don’t want to deprive them.

If it were just me, I could live with a lot less, but it is not just me.

How do you guys feel about finding that middle ground?
I meant to say I tell my kids they are spoiled, not strong. 😛
 
Can not one argue that living a life of poverty can lead to a form of pride as well? Is this why St Francis did so much penance?

Here is an example:

There are a couple of times in the book when some of the brothers, for a special feast, set a nice table with tablecloth and find silverware. St Francis would come in his tattered clothes and sit on the ground or bring with him his loaf of stale bread.

Doesn’t that in itself tend to be condemning?
No. He was making a point. Holiness is only going to be found in poverty. The Franciscan who is not poor will never get to heaven. Poverty was the special way that God gives to every Franciscan. Just as he gives silence and solitude to the Carthusian and without it, they won’t get to heaven, without poverty, we won’t make it. Francis is reminding them that they are derailing.

You must also go back and look at his life. He had great respect for ecclesial authority, regardless of how sinful or foolish it was. He understood that Christ saved us through obedience.

Francis, exercised the rights of authority. He is our father. Therefore, he had the right to correct when the brothers or sisters derail.

When he walks into a finely set table and sits on the floor, he is sending a correction. Instead of pointing fingers, which we love to do when we think someone else is wrong. Francis corrects by showing the right thing to do. He dramatizes it to make sure that the image stays with you.

You see him doing exaclty what Christ did. Christ taught with authority, but not by pointing fingers. He showed us what to do.

Fraternally,

Br. JR, OSF 🙂
 
Entitlement can be dangerous to the soul. This is what Francis finds out. Those who feel entitled don’t own their sins and often feel that they don’t owe God anything. That’s a slippery slope.
You are so right. My youngest daughter especially feels entitled to everything. I spent so much money on her Junior High School prom and she didn’t even say thank you until I prompted her. She said, “Mom, prom only happens a couple of times a year”!

My fault.

But I still have at least four years to fix my past errors.
 
When he walks into a finely set table and sits on the floor, he is sending a correction. Instead of pointing fingers, which we love to do when we think someone else is wrong. Francis corrects by showing the right thing to do.
This is golden.
 
OK, let me get back to St. Francis. :yup:

When Francis goes to the Scripture he hears Christ say three things that he takes to hear and these commands become the root of the Franciscan rule.
  • “Take nothing for your journey”
  • “Deny yourself and take up your cross”
  • “Sell what you have and give to the poor”
Jesus is not just dishing out good advice for Francis and his family. Francis asks Father Peter to open the Gospel Book three times in the Name of the Trinity. This is an extremely important detail. Everything that Francis does and teaches is Trinitarian. We live in the presence of the Trinity and we are guided by the Trinity. Therefore, our life, even our prayer, should be an act of honor to the Trinity.

The Holy Spirit speaks to Francis, and tells him that the way to the Father is through the Son. He must put himself at the mercy of God as the Son did.

Yes, and as I said above, the difference between him and Dominic is that Francis method of preaching is a popular method, one that can be adopted by anyone. You don’t have to be a priest or religious to preach the Gospel the way Francis preached it.

He read the Gospel, prayed over the Gospel, asked the Church to confirm his understanding, then he went out and put into practice what the Gospel said. When anyone asked, “Why don’t you get excited, angry, or feel indignation? Can’t you see all of the heresy around us? Can’t you see the abuses by the clergy?” Francis could calmly answer, “Look at the birds of the air and the lilies of the field, no heretic, no cleric, no bishop, can care for us as our Father does. We are in his hands. He will lead us as he led Moses out of Egypt.” He preached without confrontation and without frustration.

Francis paid very close attention to Jesus’ self disclosures. This is very Franciscan Theology. Aquinas did not pay much attention to this. I’m not saying that Aquinas missed something. It’s just that he did not. It’s that simple.

Francis pays attention to Christ’s self disclosures.

I AM the way

I AM the Good Shepherd

I AM the vine

I AM he

Jesus Christ, who is humility incarnate, speaks in simple facts. He speaks of himself in terms of who he is, I AM . . .

Our Holy Father runs with this example. If one is to be humble, one must begin with I AM a sinner. I AM an instrument. I AM [fill in the blank]. One does not inflate what one is, nor does one deny it. One simply accepts it. He would always say, “I am what I am before God, nothing else.” In his mind, no man is more or less than what he is before God. This became another of his mantras that he would hand down to his sons and daughters. We judge actions; we do not judge people. We speak about what people do, we do not speak about what they are before God. Only the individual and God knows what he is. Humility starts with I AM . . ., as Christ spoke and does not make judgments about what others are, because only Christ knows what others are.

He had a wonderful relationship with Clare. It was very human. She was in love with his holiness. He was used to flattery. He had been a pretty boy, though he was not a sinner at all. He was charming, friendly, generous, talented and a really nice guy to have around. Clare’s adulation did not help, because it triggered those old feelings of self-awareness, self-importance and pride. There was also another part.

He was young and he had a strong libido. She was young and beautiful. She too had an attractive personality, charming, witty, very intelligent and she was his intellectual superior. She was the woman of his dreams. If he was to be her father, he needed to act like a father. There were boundaries that had to be kept.

Finally, there was the fraternal dimension of this relationship. Clare always referred to herself as Francis’ plant. Allegedly, he was her guide. This part was true. He was the teacher and the Patriarch. However, she did not treat him as a daughter does a father. She treated him as an older sister would treat a son, even though she was 10-years his junior. She would box his ears, which was another reason to stay away.

There was a time when he wanted to go out and do what Dominic was doing. He wanted to convert heretics and Muslims. He left to go on a mission. When he returned, she gave him an earful. She told him that his mission was to convert Catholics to Christianity. She did not like Catholics at all. Which is very interesting. She loved the Catholic Church, but she felt that Catholics seemed to come in two crops, the left and the right. Someone had to bring them to the center, that was Francis.

Mother Teresa read this and this is how she concludes that Christ lives among us in the distressing disguise of the poor.
Br.Jay,
Thanks for continuing to share…this is all so interesting!
 
This is golden.
Of course it’s golden. Francis learned it from the Master himself. Everything Jesus teaches is golden. Francis was one of those rare people who understood Jesus very well and tried to teach others what he learned from the Lord.

He can say “learn from me for I am pure and humble of heart,” because he learned from Jesus. Observe, how the saints point us back to Jesus. Especially this one.

Fraternally,

Br. JR, OSF 🙂
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top