The Poor Pope

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kearney
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
From The Sunday Times
February 22, 2009
Cardinals turn on Pope Invisible
The pontiff is facing dissent over his distant, regal style
IN the hushed Apostolic Palace off St Peter’s Square, Pope Benedict XVI starts the day with a 7am mass in his private chapel, followed by a lone breakfast. No press summary is brought to him. He meets a few visitors in the morning and then, after a lunch served on gold-rimmed plates bearing his seal, retires to his study to write speeches and read theological works throughout the afternoon and evening.

The Pope’s daily routine, as described by Vatican insiders, is being blamed for a series of blunders that have prompted a rare show of dissent from exasperated cardinals. Critics claim he is leading the church and its 1.2 billion faithful like a monarch cut off from the world outside his palace windows, helped only by loyal but inept advisers.

“People feel disoriented,” a senior Vatican official confided last week. “It’s a feeling common to both traditionalists and reformers. Our impression is that there isn’t anyone at the wheel.”

Hailed by his peers as “the most intelligent” candidate when he was elected Pope in 2005, the 81-year-old German pontiff has provoked outrage and a rebuke from Angela Merkel, the German chancellor, by revoking the excommunication of four breakaway bishops from the ultra-conservative Society of St Pius X. They included a British bishop, Richard Williamson, who has denied the existence of Nazi gas chambers.
Benedict then named Father Gerhard Maria Wagner as the Bishop of Linz, in Austria. Wagner had preached that Hurricane Katrina was retribution for the activities of abortionists, prostitutes and homosexuals in New Orleans.

Simmering discontent within the church exploded with the debacle over Williamson, who was subsequently removed from his post as head of a seminary in Buenos Aires and ordered to leave Argentina.

German Cardinal Walter Kasper, in charge of Jewish relations, denounced “misunderstandings and management errors in the curia” (the Pope’s civil service) – an implicit attack on the Pope himself.

Upset by the Williamson and Wagner decisions, Austrian Cardinal Christoph Schönborn met the Pope in Rome earlier this month. The audience failed to reassure Schönborn, who called a meeting of Austrian bishops. They in turn urged the Vatican to learn from past mistakes and respect the rules for appointing bishops. They demanded “scrupulousness” and “sensitivity” in future.

Violating the custom that cardinals do not criticise one another, Cardinal Giovanni Battista Re, head of the congregation of bishops, launched a loud denunciation of his Colombian colleague, Cardinal Dario Castrillon Hoyos, who was in charge of relations with the Society of Pius X.

On a bus carrying dignitaries to a religious ceremony in Rome, Re was overheard protesting that Castrillon Hoyos had forced colleagues to take a hasty decision. “He only gave me a few hours to sign. All because Castrillon will soon turn 80 and retire. If he hadn’t solved the problem right away, it would have been too late for him,” Re fumed.

For many inside the Vatican, the issue is the Pope’s style of leadership. “People feel that the Pope is governing in a very monarchical way. He fails to consult bishops and he has isolated himself by ignoring advice which could stop him making mistakes,” said Marco Politi, a leading Vatican analyst.
“The Pope believes he doesn’t need to take account of public opinion. He studies the files that are brought to him and decides very much on his own. The atmosphere around him is that he mustn’t be disturbed by criticism or visitors.”

Benedict offended Muslims with a 2006 speech quoting a Byzantine emperor who described the prophet Muhammad’s teachings as “evil and inhuman”. He upset Israel and Jews by saying he wanted to make a saint of Pope Pius XII, despite criticism that Pius had failed to speak out against the Holocaust during the second world war. Then he offended homosexuals by saying that their behaviour was a “destruction of God’s work”.

Benedict is ruling the church “from the top of the mainmast, he doesn’t have experience of holding the rudder”, said Giancarlo Zizola, a writer on Vatican affairs. “He performs the duties of a pope in the mornings, but in the afternoon and evenings he’s a theologian.”

Benedict meets far fewer people than John Paul II and does not share his predecessor’s habit of inviting guests to lunch and dinner. On the top floor of the Apostolic Palace he is flanked by Georg Gänswein, 52, his personal secretary.

“Father Georg is very strict, he selects who does and doesn’t see the Pope and keeps everyone punctual,” a Vatican observer said.

Several insiders fault Benedict’s choice of advisers, most of whom he has known for years. “The Pope has surrounded himself with collaborators who act more like obsequious subjects than real advisers,” said Zizola.

His main adviser, secretary of state Cardinal Tarcisio Bertone, 74, has the Pope’s ear but little political or diplomatic experience.

Church leaders are praying for a more harmonious leadership by the Pope, who will seek to mend relations with Israel on a visit to Jerusalem in May. At the Vatican last week Gordon Brown invited Benedict to Britain later this year or next, which may also help to bolster the pontiff’s reputation.

Bertone is expected to make new appointments to strengthen his team soon. “Sacking people would be like asking the Pope to go back on his decisions and that doesn’t happen,” Zizola said. “I expect the blunders will continue unless he decides to launch real reform of the way the church is run. Even in the Vatican you can’t just rely on the Holy Spirit.”
timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/europe/article5780270.ece
Sounds like Michael O’Brien’s Father Elijah had a strong streak of prophecy running through it. 😦
 
Obviously that article is a bunch of marlarkey!! (that means foolish talk, for those who don’t know.) Here is just one example of why that article is false:,
I am speaking to this part of it, just ONE example.
**He upset Israel and Jews by saying he wanted to make a saint of Pope Pius XII, despite criticism that Pius had failed to speak out against the Holocaust during the second world war. **

Here is the truth on that!!

…The commitment of the Pave the Way foundation reflects that of its president, **a Jewish American, who acknowledges that he grew up “despising Pius XII.” This changed **when he read Dan Kurzman’s book, “A Special Mission: Hitler’s Secret Plot to Seize the Vatican and Kidnap Pope Pius the XII.”

…**The foundation stated that the lack of public statements by the Pope, which has been a source of criticism against him, is explained by the increased punishment in concentration camps, witnessed by former prisoners, when Church leaders spoke openly against the Nazi regime. **(THIS WAS WHY HE REMAINED SILENT AND JUST DID WHAT HE DID, THE MORE HE SAID, THE MORE THEY WERE PUNISHED IN THE CONCENTRATION CAMPS) So, he kept his mouth shut for their lives!!! (MY words)
,These documents, available for downloading from the foundation’s Web site, include a nun’s manuscript from 1943, detailing the Pope’s order to hide Jews in Rome and a list of protected Jews.
During the war, Pius XII saved 80,000 lives by persuading the Hungarian regent to prevent the deportation of the Jews. He also requested the Brazilian government to receive 3,000 "non-Aryans
."

…Another document provided by the foundation is an interview with Monsignor Giovanni Ferrofino, secretary of the nuncio in Haiti. The priest said 11,000 Jews were saved by Pius XII’s continual requests for visas from General Trujillo, president of the Dominican Republic.

There is much more, read the whole truth yourself here:
zenit.org/article-25153?l=english
Zenit.org is “The world seen from Rome” and
EWTN’s “Seen and Unseen”
ewtn.com/news/blog.asp?blog_ID=2
These are but just two reliable sources that tell the truth and don’t make it up as they go along.
If you want the truth, as usual, go to the source of THE TRUTH.👍
 
It does seem he is struggling to capture people’s hearts and minds in the same way JP-II did. Technically his reforms might be spot on, but if he can’t carry the people (cardinals, bishops, priests and laity) with him then they will remain a niche interest. He needs to find someone who can really start to get a powerful momentum of mainstream popular support behind him.
 
:signofcross:

:gopray:

Most Blessed Virgin, please keep the Holy Father under your mantle of protection. Intercede for him to your Divine Son.

:gopray:

Remember, O most gracious Virgin Mary, that never was it known that anyone who fled to they protection, implored they help, or sought thy intercession was left unaided. Inspired with this confidence, I fly unto thee, O Virgin of virgins, my Mother. To thee I come, before thee I stand, sinful and sorrowful. O Mother of the Word Incarnate, despise not my petitions, but in thy mercy hear and answer me. Amen.

:signofcross:
:crossrc: :crossrc:
 
Few things sicken me so much as idiots who criticize the Pope based on his “style”. I cannot express myself fully, because of language restrictions, but suffice it to say that if they cannot base their criticism on whether his actions are good, true, and just, they should shut up, seeing as they aren’t worthy of such a leader any way.

Lord, bless your vicar, Benedict XVI, let him be a good shepherd, and have mercy upon him.
Amen.
 
Did that article come from the National Enquirer? That’s just what it sounded like.
 
Let’s see, Pope Benedict is doing a poor job of running the church, because liberals within the church are un happy with some of his actions.
That’s exactly what I heard from that article. Let’s be straight - even the holiest and ablest of popes are going to be open to criticism, so criticism need not be malicious. But the whole article stank of “He didn’t do what I would have done, and he shows no signs of following my advice in the future. He’s hopeless.”
It does seem he is struggling to capture people’s hearts and minds in the same way JP-II did. Technically his reforms might be spot on, but if he can’t carry the people (cardinals, bishops, priests and laity) with him then they will remain a niche interest. He needs to find someone who can really start to get a powerful momentum of mainstream popular support behind him.
The rub of it all is that Benedict’s actions have shown a great amount of calculation so as not to act before he can establish a base of support and calm opponents’ fears, and failing that possibility at least prepare a foundation for lasting change. He is both a student of the disastrous post-conciliar history and a longtime veteran of the curia. So not only does he make changes gradually, so as not to repeat the victimizations of the 60s and 70s, but he also lays groundwork so that his actions will not be the mere whim of an autocrat that will assuredly be changed by the mere whim of the next. JP II inherited a broken Church; things were not bad, they were horrific. He knew he couldn’t wave a magic wand, so he pushed incremental change. That managed to prevent schism, and also effected some real improvement, but it only started the necessary work - after a quarter-century of things getting better, Cdl. Ratzinger still described the barque of Peter as taking on water on every side. Pope Benedict’s actions, now, may seem more dramatic than John Paul’s, but the basic strategy of effecting sustainable change seems to me to have remained constant between the two men. Benedict just has a different opinion as to how much we can handle and how much is necessary regardless of the fallout.
 
I’d like to think you were right Andreas, and until recently I shared your POV. But when the Pope is being criticised by prominant Cardinals like Cardinal Schoenberg something appears to be going wrong with how the Vatican is working. Unfortunately the Vatican has *not *prepared the groundwork with its own Cardinals - that has what has caused so much trouble in the last few months. I think this year is a critical one for the Vatican. At least in Europe the Vatican is very much on the back foot and needs to turn things around pretty quickly if it is to move forward again with the reform agenda in a positive way (it is just fire-fighting at the moment). I’m sure they can do it - but it may require the Pope to be willing to spend more personal time with his Cardinals to get them more fully behind him in Europe. There are some excellent priests fully bought into the reforms - but the gap (and it is an important gap) in Europe seems to be at the Bishop/Cardinal level.
 
I’d like to think you were right Andreas, and until recently I shared your POV. But when the Pope is being criticised by prominant Cardinals like Cardinal Schoenberg something appears to be going wrong with how the Vatican is working.
I wouldn’t trust a Cardinal who not only allowed, but presided over this circus of a Mass:

youtube.com/watch?v=67Lom28KSlg

This is the same Cardinal Schönborn who allowed homoerotic depictions of Christ and the Last Supper to be displayed in a Roman Catholic Vienna Cathedral. (See: the-two-malcontents.com/2008/04/07/alfred-hrdlickas-erotic-jesus-sparks-art-debate-in-austria/) Warning: the video may be inappropriate for children.

He makes Cardinal Mahony look like a saint.

These cardinals should take a good look at themselves before criticizing the Holy Father who did nothing wrong at all. The excommunications of the SSPX bishops were probably lifted as a solution to combat the work of these so-called shepherds making a mockery of our faith.
 
Indeed JPUSC, but the Holy Father depends on those Cardinals to implement his reforms. That is exactly what I am saying - the Holy Father is not bringing the Cardinals and Bishops along with him. I’m not saying that the Holy Father is wrong (far from it) - but there is no use being right unless you have the skills to get people (and your generals first of all) to follow you. We all know the Holy Father is a very shy man, but he needs to find a way to somehow engage the episcopate (or find someone who can). Schönborn is a popular and powerful man, and the Pope has uncessarily lost his support over the Fr Wagner debacle.
 
Thank God we finally have a pope that teaches from doctrine and tradition, and not on political correctenss. I am not surpised that the world, the media, and the liberal church is not rallying around him. Why would they? Pope Benedict XVl is leading, and surounding himself who will do the same. The liberals within the Church is what is hurting the Church. Our own worst enemy are those among us who are blinded by modernism.
 
May God hold Our Holy Father in his arms! I love Pope Benedict he is a very holy man who is doing God’s work on earth. The dissenters and the liberals are upset that he is doing just that. The louder they protest only means he is doing it right!
 
Sounds like Michael O’Brien’s Father Elijah had a strong streak of prophecy running through it.
JP, the book is about a Carmelite priest called upon by the Holy Father (fictitious, of course, but amazingly like JPII) to try to bring the man believed to be the AntiChrist to repentance. The setting of the book is our time and the force of world opinion is ever rising against creedal Christianity in general and Catholicism and the Pope in particular. Among the villains of the work are some Catholic theologians and traitors within the hierarchy who are toadies for the forces arrayed against the Bishop of Rome. So you can see why this recent piece from the media struck a chord of recognition in me. I highly recommend the book and any of Michael O’Brien’s other writings.
 
May God hold Our Holy Father in his arms! I love Pope Benedict he is a very holy man who is doing God’s work on earth.
Indeed! But wouldn’t it be even better if he put aside some time to talk to more of his cardinals and bishops? The written word is great to record things, but the spoken word is so much more powerful in getting people to come along with you at the time. There’s the real danger of a back-lash in Europe at the moment (well, in fact a back-lash is happening, especially in countries effected directly by the Shoah) but it could be stopped. I think some of the problem is simply because the European bishops feel ignored. A little more attention could really help to bring them along. The Holy Father’s reforms are endangered in Europe simply because he’s not seen as talking to people (starting with the Bishops) enough.

I would disagree with previous posters who compared the Pope to a monarchy. In today’s Church the Pope needs to carry people with him.

But of course I know I do ask the impossible from anyone - someone with Pope Benedicts insight into the history of the Church, coupled with Pope JP-II’s ability to win hearts and minds. By the Holy Father’s age no doubt I will not want to spend my whole time socialising. God bless him - he is indeed a very holy and very good man. I am sure we will treasure his writings.
 
Indeed JPUSC, but the Holy Father depends on those Cardinals to implement his reforms. That is exactly what I am saying - the Holy Father is not bringing the Cardinals and Bishops along with him. I’m not saying that the Holy Father is wrong (far from it) - but there is no use being right unless you have the skills to get people (and your generals first of all) to follow you. We all know the Holy Father is a very shy man, but he needs to find a way to somehow engage the episcopate (or find someone who can). Schönborn is a popular and powerful man, and the Pope has uncessarily lost his support over the Fr Wagner debacle.
The unfortunate thing is that I don’t think the Fr. Wagner debacle would have been a debacle if it didn’t happen to coincide with the re-admission of the SSPX bishops. And I think the SSPX debacle was only such because he understimated the significance the liberal traitors to the Church would place on the ecclesial status of four individuals whose suspensions remained in place. I do take your point, though. Pope Benedict seems to be speeding up and strengthening his reforms, and the left feels its back against the wall. I think part of what has happened is that he has realized he’s not going to be able to reform the curia; thus, he’s starting to count more and more on the few reliable cardinals. Unfortunately, it seems that Cdl. Bertone is actually causing more trouble for the pope (like undermining/confusing the advice to the church in China). Let’s just hope that the Lord grants Benedict many more years so that he is not taken from us in the midst of the dissenters’ counter-attack.
 
The unfortunate thing is that I don’t think the Fr. Wagner debacle would have been a debacle if it didn’t happen to coincide with the re-admission of the SSPX bishops.
I think you are right - it would have remained as local news.
 
Viva il Papa! B16 is da Bomb! With every “mistake” the pope makes, the weeds grow in their arrogance, and make themselves more and more visible. Keep making mistakes, Your Holiness!

“Lord… In Your field we see more weeds than wheat.” - Pope Benedict XVI

All according to plan…
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top