F
fhansen
Guest
How might our world look different if everyone was certain life continued after death-just that one belief alone?
Big assumption, W, and I’d have to say I don’t agree.It would be empty. Everyone would commit suicide, assuming that the belief carried with it the certainty that the afterlife is better than this life.
Of course, we have no reason to think the Egyptians and Babylonians doubted any less than we do, indeed, they probably doubted more, since the priests were notoriously corrupt. Remember the dragon of Bel?Case 1) Reincarnation. Held by most faiths based in the Orient. If this is true, “you” cease being, and so this is the same as permanent death. No gain there.
I took the OP’s thread to mean conviction, or certainty, of afterlife, as opposed to mere belief, though!
Indeed. And I meant that even if we knew that afterlife existed, but nothing of its nature, we would be no more attracted to it than we are now, given the 3 rather unappealing prospects.Of course, we have no reason to think the Egyptians and Babylonians doubted any less than we do, indeed, they probably doubted more, since the priests were notoriously corrupt. Remember the dragon of Bel?
I took the OP’s thread to mean conviction, or certainty, of afterlife, as opposed to mere belief, though!
Nope.I would rephrase the question and wonder how much better the world would be right now if people realised this was it - you get one shot at making a difference, so make it now. I think it would be an enormous force for good in the world.
Sarah x![]()
Sadly there is already an emormous amount of cruelty to the elderly, the disabled, the young. Just look at the amount of charities tasked with filling the gaps for these groups. And this is in a society where the majority are believers in some faith or other.And also a huge amount of cruelty toward those at the edges of life: the disabled, the old, infants, etc, since if they have no enduring value, why sacrifice in any way for such persons?
God Bless and ICXC NIKA.
I’m not sure things will change all that much.How might our world look different if everyone was certain life continued after death-just that one belief alone?
Believe me, it can get a lot worse. Terri Schiavo was just the tip of the iceberg.Sadly there is already an emormous amount of cruelty to the elderly, the disabled, the young. Just look at the amount of charities tasked with filling the gaps for these groups. And this is in a society where the majority are believers in some faith or other.
They’ll do as they want and not bother with forgiveness at all, more likely.I cant help wondering if people realised they couldnt just do as they wanted then seek forgiveness in whatever form,
Imagine all the people, living for today…but knuckled down and made the best of every minute here on earth, not looking forward to anything beyond, we would indeed see a better world.
The existence of the worlds religions doesnt seem to me to have prevented the abuse of the elderly, young and disabled.
This in no way what so ever implies the worlds religions have not done great good. Merely their existence doesnt seem to have stopped great harm also being done.
The existence of law, society and justice do not prevent human beings victimizing each other, either, but the situation would be worse without them.Sarah x![]()
People would have to know about the nature of the afterlife to care one way or another.How might our world look different if everyone was certain life continued after death-just that one belief alone?
One of the reasons I ask is because, from my understanding, Eastern Churches generally consider physical death to be the chief consequence of Original or Ancestral Sin. And the result is said to be that man, being trapped like a caged animal between the boundaries of birth and death, ends up with concupiscence, more or less like the “grab the gusto” scenario GEddie mentioned, with the obvious outcome of sin. The remedy-the major part of the healing- is Jesus’ triumph over death, the final enemy, where man is released from the fear of annihilation.People would have to know about the nature of the afterlife to care one way or another.
If everyone knew absolutely that the afterlife continued after death, but that it would be the Christian idea of heaven, hell and purgatory, I think many people would act upon it and strive for goodness, justice and truth to be united with God in heaven. But there would still be people, destined for hell by their own actions, who wouldn’t give a care. Also, there would be disagreement about the objectivity of what goodness, justice and truth consists.
Some would say we live in a Christian country, so why aren’t more people striving to attain perfection in the Christian life? Probably, because their faith is less than the mustard seed Jesus spoke about in the gospel. Or their will is weak.
So all in all, I don’t think speculation about this scenario makes much difference compared to the reality, at least for the Christian idea.
For other religious/philosophical paradigms, it would seem to me that there’d be even less concern since there would be no reason to find the afterlife attractive as the concept of heaven in the Christian faith.
Not sure I follow that one, Rf. Care to elaborate?You can do an empiric test, though it will take some time unless you are specially graced, that will lead you to that certainty. But it is not in the terms your faith would have it. It can’t be. Therefor we have some inexplicable statements from some of the Saints. But if you “got it” you wouldn’t need your faith, but might keep practicing it. Or not. And neither are many interested in doing it; precious few in fact. But the price is: don’t do–don’t see. Then you are stuck with just dogma and a hope.
And yet, amazingly, some actually seem to need reminding of death; what is Ash Wednesday but a liturgical reminder of death? Why should such be needed?It’s an interesting question to me because the specter of death must have a powerful influence over us whether we’re conscious of it or not.
It’s a PUNISHMENT, pure and simple. “Beneficial” doesn’t enter into it.Another related question from the Christian perspective might be, why did God ban man from eating from the Tree of Life, so that he may live. Is the awareness of a limited lifespan somehow beneficial for fallen man?
Yes, but God could’ve annihilated us altogether. Instead, physical death is delayed in this life, a repreive, so to speak, affording us the time to have a change of heart from the one inherited from our first parents. I think the specter of death was meant to have the beneficial effect of providing a limited and certain time span within which to work out our salvation, so our actions can be weighed against the seriousness of such a life. Punishment, yes, but still reformative in intent, a part of God’s plan of salvation, already mapped out and kicked into gear from the get-go, IOW.And yet, amazingly, some actually seem to need reminding of death; what is Ash Wednesday but a liturgical reminder of death? Why should such be needed?
It’s a PUNISHMENT, pure and simple. “Beneficial” doesn’t enter into it.
God Bless and ICXC NIKA.
If that is the only thing people realised it would be an enormous force for evil in the world. Many would think they get only one shot at making a difference for** themselves**, so make it now!I would rephrase the question and wonder how much better the world would be right now if people realised this was it - you get one shot at making a difference, so make it now. I think it would be an enormous force for good in the world.
Sarah x![]()
You asked what is a “What if…” question; if what is a belief now was a certainty, things might change in terms of people’s behavior. Since you are a Catholic I’m assuming that you meant afterlife both as a general truth and that it might include consequences. So tell me if I’m wrong, but I’m reading you as saying that we ought to behave according to your faith in order to gain the best consequences and that if we knew for sure that they existed, that would go strongly to motive.How might our world look different if everyone was certain life continued after death-just that one belief alone?
Hi, Rf, thanks for the reply. I really intended the question to be about the effects that our pending death has on us-and how our lives might be different for better or worse if the “threat” of non-existence were definitively ruled out in our minds, with little more knowledge than that.Mr. fhansen, your original statement is:You asked what is a “What if…” question; if what is a belief now was a certainty, things might change in terms of people’s behavior. Since you are a Catholic I’m assuming that you meant afterlife both as a general truth and that it might include consequences. So tell me if I’m wrong, but I’m reading you as saying that we ought to behave according to your faith in order to gain the best consequences and that if we knew for sure that they existed, that would go strongly to motive.
I’m proposing that such a knowledge can be gained before death as a matter of certainty by means of known practices. But knowing that you are of a particular faith, I’m cautioning that the inevitable results of such a discovery would not be to your liking by any means in terms of what you currently believe. And I hypothesize that if I were to spell out what that method is, me having experience with the Church from both within and without, you will dismiss it. You will do so despite that as the best of my ability tells me, it is the very method used consciously or unconsciously by some Saints in the Church who arrived at that inevitable conclusion. And for that break through they were suspect, or more precisely the part of their legacy having to do with the final step they took, was suspect and still is. It’s common knowledge among many and has been mentioned on here before.
For what it’s worth, despite my very few posts on here, I’ve scanned a whole lot of threads going way back. The people who seem to agree with me are very ill received by the Faithful, whether they are Catholic or not, and some have even been banned. So you understand my reluctance in this matter on several levels. And I further claim that in the same way that one won’t see what’s at the other end of a telescope or a microscope unless they look through it, they won’t have this available certainty without doing the do according to specification. It just won’t wash to act like the Cardinal who refused to look through Galileo’s telescope because he knew it didn’t work. And I have no doubt that that man was acting in full accordance with his faith.
So I’m kind of faced with a conundrum: I know something works and the people who would benefit from it won’t touch it as a point of faith, or what they think is their faith. What would you do? You asked the question, it has an answer, and from every indication on here it won’t fly for you folks despite its proven success. I’m stumped.
As a Catholic, I believe that death is not extinction … but the afterlife is not just a simple continuation of our present everyday world … when we die, we cease “to-be-in-the-world” … both believers and non-believers would agree that how we deal with this “absence” is important … human beings are unique in this respect … dogs and cats and other animals don’t have to deal with this problem … now I believe that the afterlife will eventually usher in a new heaven and a new earth … with no absences …How might our world look different if everyone was certain life continued after death-just that one belief alone?