J
Joe_5859
Guest
I’m starting this thread mainly as a reflection on two blog posts – Part One and Part Two.
I think the author does a good job (particularly in the second post) in articulating some thoughts that I’ve had but found difficulty putting into words. The line that jumped out at me the most was this:
No, we are Catholic, and we will not stand for aesthetic relativism any more than we will for moral relativism. If all beauty comes from God, then it is not our reactions that define whether something is beautiful.
I like the phrase “aesthetic relativism.”
Obviously, when talking about the beauty of any art, there is much more leeway than regarding moral issues. But beauty is not completely subjective. I cannot say that my daughter’s finger painting is objectively more beautiful than Michelangelo’s Sistine Chapel, even if it is subjectively more meaningful to me.
Agree? Disagree? Let’s discuss (in charity, of course).
I think the author does a good job (particularly in the second post) in articulating some thoughts that I’ve had but found difficulty putting into words. The line that jumped out at me the most was this:
No, we are Catholic, and we will not stand for aesthetic relativism any more than we will for moral relativism. If all beauty comes from God, then it is not our reactions that define whether something is beautiful.
I like the phrase “aesthetic relativism.”
Obviously, when talking about the beauty of any art, there is much more leeway than regarding moral issues. But beauty is not completely subjective. I cannot say that my daughter’s finger painting is objectively more beautiful than Michelangelo’s Sistine Chapel, even if it is subjectively more meaningful to me.
Agree? Disagree? Let’s discuss (in charity, of course).