S
Safia
Guest
I’ve been meditating, on and off, about the prodigal son parable, and I had a question. I know it’s very basic, but I just couldn’t articulate the answer.
I can very easily understand the father: he loves his son dearly, and is quick to forgive. This exhibits the most perfect form of charity and mercy.
But I cannot as easily understand the son. He has repented, yes, which means that he has some kind of right to his father’s kindness. But at which point is it fair or good or for the son to forget the harm he caused? Is he expected to be conscious of it forever, or to pretend like it never happened, or what?
The father never ceased to love. But the son, in a way, did.
I’m having a hard time getting over that hurdle, both theologically and personally. Any explanations or insight = very appreciated.
Thanks!
I can very easily understand the father: he loves his son dearly, and is quick to forgive. This exhibits the most perfect form of charity and mercy.
But I cannot as easily understand the son. He has repented, yes, which means that he has some kind of right to his father’s kindness. But at which point is it fair or good or for the son to forget the harm he caused? Is he expected to be conscious of it forever, or to pretend like it never happened, or what?
The father never ceased to love. But the son, in a way, did.
I’m having a hard time getting over that hurdle, both theologically and personally. Any explanations or insight = very appreciated.
Thanks!